A political economy analysis protocol: Case study implementing nutrition and sustainability policy into government food procurement.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
11
11
2021
accepted:
23
08
2022
entrez:
9
9
2022
pubmed:
10
9
2022
medline:
14
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Most Australian state and territory governments have healthy food provisioning policies targeting availability of unhealthy food at the retail level, and sustainability policies promoting a life-cycle approach to procurement. However, it remains unclear if health and sustainability are important considerations in awarding contracts, and whether these high-level policies are implemented into supplier contracts. A political economy analysis framework has been developed to prospectively identify and explain barriers and enablers to policy implementation. Using food procurement in Queensland and South Australia as case studies, the political economy analysis seeks to understand the structural and contextual factors, bargaining processes, stakeholders, and incentives and ideas surrounding food procurement. It involves a desktop and content analysis of existing policies and food contracts, and key informant interviews with government and industry stakeholders. Participants will be targeted across different departments (e.g. health, environment, treasury) and in varying roles from policy design, contract management and food service, and industry suppliers in different food and drink categories (e.g. meat, packaged foods, beverages, fruit & vegetables). Participants will be recruited using purposive sampling. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts will be undertaken, informed by the political economy analysis framework. The study will identify current food procurement policy implementation barriers and enablers, including why high-level policies aren't embedded into contracts, mechanisms for achieving policy coherence and future opportunities for addressing barriers and incorporating socio-economic, public health and environmental considerations into purchasing practices. Ultimately, the study will achieve impact by informing a whole of government approach to health and the environment by elevating the priority of health and sustainability in procurement (short term), increasing the availability of healthy and sustainable foods (medium term), and improving health and environmental outcomes (long term). To our knowledge this is the first political economy analysis of food procurement in Australia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36084101
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274246
pii: PONE-D-21-35596
pmc: PMC9462754
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0274246Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Références
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Dec;2(12):e681-2
pubmed: 25433616
Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(3):183-194
pubmed: 31369319
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Mar 03;11(3):2608-27
pubmed: 24595213
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Feb 10;3(1):e000485
pubmed: 29527338
Lancet. 2019 Feb 23;393(10173):791-846
pubmed: 30700377
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2018 Jan;38(1):6-17
pubmed: 29323862
Lancet. 2013 Aug 10;382(9891):552-69
pubmed: 23746781
Global Health. 2014 Sep 12;10:66
pubmed: 25213212
Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(3):224-235
pubmed: 31390295
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):1038
pubmed: 32605547
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014 Oct 16;9:26152
pubmed: 25326092