PET-directed combined modality therapy for gastroesophageal junction cancer: Results of the multicentre prospective MEMORI trial of the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK).


Journal

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Historique:
received: 20 05 2022
revised: 19 07 2022
accepted: 21 07 2022
pubmed: 14 9 2022
medline: 19 10 2022
entrez: 13 9 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Positron emission tomography (PET) may differentiate responding and non-responding tumours early in the treatment of locally advanced gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. Early PET non-responders (P-NR) after induction CTX might benefit from changing to chemoradiation (CRT). Patients underwent baseline In total, 160 patients with resectable gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas were prospectively investigated by PET scanning. Eighty-five patients (53%) were excluded. Seventy-five eligible patients were enrolled in the study. Based on PET criteria, 50 (67.6%)/24 (32.4%) were P-R and P-NR, respectively. Resection was performed on 46 responders, including one patient who withdrew the ICF, and 22 non-responders (per-protocol population). R0 resection rates were 95.6% (43/45) for P-R and 86.4% (19/22) for P-NR. No treatment related deaths occurred. With a median follow-up time of 24.5 months, estimated 18 months DFS was 75.4%/64.2% for P-R/P-NR, respectively. The estimated 18 months OS was 95.5% for P-R and 68.2% for P-NR. The primary endpoint of the study to increase the R0 resection rate in metabolic NR was not met. PET response after induction CTX is prognostic for outcome with a prolonged OS and DFS in PET responders. NCT00002014-000860-16.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Positron emission tomography (PET) may differentiate responding and non-responding tumours early in the treatment of locally advanced gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. Early PET non-responders (P-NR) after induction CTX might benefit from changing to chemoradiation (CRT).
METHODS
Patients underwent baseline
RESULTS
In total, 160 patients with resectable gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas were prospectively investigated by PET scanning. Eighty-five patients (53%) were excluded. Seventy-five eligible patients were enrolled in the study. Based on PET criteria, 50 (67.6%)/24 (32.4%) were P-R and P-NR, respectively. Resection was performed on 46 responders, including one patient who withdrew the ICF, and 22 non-responders (per-protocol population). R0 resection rates were 95.6% (43/45) for P-R and 86.4% (19/22) for P-NR. No treatment related deaths occurred. With a median follow-up time of 24.5 months, estimated 18 months DFS was 75.4%/64.2% for P-R/P-NR, respectively. The estimated 18 months OS was 95.5% for P-R and 68.2% for P-NR.
CONCLUSION
The primary endpoint of the study to increase the R0 resection rate in metabolic NR was not met. PET response after induction CTX is prognostic for outcome with a prolonged OS and DFS in PET responders.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
NCT00002014-000860-16.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36099671
pii: S0959-8049(22)00451-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.027
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Radiopharmaceuticals 0
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 0Z5B2CJX4D

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00002014']

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

99-106

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Sylvie Lorenzen (S)

Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Munich, Germany.

Michael Quante (M)

Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Munich, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Freiburg, Germany.

Isabel Rauscher (I)

Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany.

Julia Slotta-Huspenina (J)

Technical University Munich, Institute of Pathology, Munich, Germany.

Wilko Weichert (W)

Technical University Munich, Institute of Pathology, Munich, Germany.

Marcus Feith (M)

Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Surgical Clinic and Policlinic, Munich, Germany.

Helmut Friess (H)

Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Surgical Clinic and Policlinic, Munich, Germany.

Stefanie E Combs (SE)

Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany.

Wolfgang A Weber (WA)

Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany.

Bernhard Haller (B)

Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Institute of AI and Informatics in Medicine, Munich, Germany.

Martin Angele (M)

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, LMU University Hospital, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Munich, Germany.

Markus Albertsmeier (M)

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, LMU University Hospital, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Munich, Germany.

Christiane Blankenstein (C)

Technical University Munich, School of Medicine, Münchner Studienzentrum, Munich, Germany.

Stefan Kasper (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany.

Roland M Schmid (RM)

Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Munich, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Freiburg, Germany.

Florian Bassermann (F)

Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Munich, Germany.

Markus Schwaiger (M)

Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany.

Sven-Thorsten Liffers (ST)

German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany; Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK, Partner Site Essen) and German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.

Jens T Siveke (JT)

Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Germany; Bridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Division of Solid Tumor Translational Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK, Partner Site Essen) and German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: j.siveke@dkfz.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH