Integrated Geriatric Assessment and Treatment Effectiveness (INTEGERATE) in older people with cancer starting systemic anticancer treatment in Australia: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.


Journal

The lancet. Healthy longevity
ISSN: 2666-7568
Titre abrégé: Lancet Healthy Longev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101773309

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2022
Historique:
received: 05 04 2022
revised: 29 06 2022
accepted: 06 07 2022
entrez: 14 9 2022
pubmed: 15 9 2022
medline: 17 9 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in improving health outcomes in cancer settings is unclear. We evaluated whether CGA can improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in older people with cancer who are starting systemic anticancer treatment. INTEGERATE is a multicentre, open-label, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial that was done at three hospitals in Australia. Participants aged 70 years and older with solid cancer or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma planned for chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy, were randomly assigned (1:1; using a central computer-generated minimisation algorithm with a random element, balancing treatment intent, cancer type, age, sex, and performance status) to receive CGA integrated into oncology care (integrated oncogeriatric care) or usual care only. Group assignment was not concealed from the participants and clinicians. The primary outcome was HRQOL over 24 weeks, assessed at baseline, week 12, week 18, and week 24, using the Elderly Functional Index (ELFI; score range 0-100). Analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ANZCTR.org.au, ACTRN12614000399695, and is completed. Between Aug 18, 2014, and Sept 5, 2018, 154 participants were randomly assigned to integrated oncogeriatric care (n=76) or usual care (n=78). 13 participants died by week 12 and 130 (92%) of the remaining 141 participants completed two or more ELFI assessments. Participants assigned to integrated oncogeriatric care reported better adjusted ELFI change scores over 24 weeks compared with those in the usual care group (overall main effect of group: t=2·1, df=213, p=0·039; effect size=0·38), with maximal between-group differences at week 18 (mean difference in change 9·8 [95% CI 2·4-17·2]; p=0·010, corrected p=0·030, effect size=0·48). The integrated oncogeriatric care group also had significantly fewer unplanned hospital admissions at 24 weeks (multivariable-adjusted incidence rate ratio 0·60 [95% CI 0·42-0·87]; p=0·0066). No statistically significant between-group difference was observed in overall survival. CGA led to better quality of life and health-care delivery in older people receiving systemic anticancer treatment. Routine CGA-based interventions should be considered in at-risk older people starting systemic anticancer treatment. National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), Monash University, and Eastern Health.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in improving health outcomes in cancer settings is unclear. We evaluated whether CGA can improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in older people with cancer who are starting systemic anticancer treatment.
METHODS
INTEGERATE is a multicentre, open-label, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial that was done at three hospitals in Australia. Participants aged 70 years and older with solid cancer or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma planned for chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy, were randomly assigned (1:1; using a central computer-generated minimisation algorithm with a random element, balancing treatment intent, cancer type, age, sex, and performance status) to receive CGA integrated into oncology care (integrated oncogeriatric care) or usual care only. Group assignment was not concealed from the participants and clinicians. The primary outcome was HRQOL over 24 weeks, assessed at baseline, week 12, week 18, and week 24, using the Elderly Functional Index (ELFI; score range 0-100). Analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ANZCTR.org.au, ACTRN12614000399695, and is completed.
FINDINGS
Between Aug 18, 2014, and Sept 5, 2018, 154 participants were randomly assigned to integrated oncogeriatric care (n=76) or usual care (n=78). 13 participants died by week 12 and 130 (92%) of the remaining 141 participants completed two or more ELFI assessments. Participants assigned to integrated oncogeriatric care reported better adjusted ELFI change scores over 24 weeks compared with those in the usual care group (overall main effect of group: t=2·1, df=213, p=0·039; effect size=0·38), with maximal between-group differences at week 18 (mean difference in change 9·8 [95% CI 2·4-17·2]; p=0·010, corrected p=0·030, effect size=0·48). The integrated oncogeriatric care group also had significantly fewer unplanned hospital admissions at 24 weeks (multivariable-adjusted incidence rate ratio 0·60 [95% CI 0·42-0·87]; p=0·0066). No statistically significant between-group difference was observed in overall survival.
INTERPRETATION
CGA led to better quality of life and health-care delivery in older people receiving systemic anticancer treatment. Routine CGA-based interventions should be considered in at-risk older people starting systemic anticancer treatment.
FUNDING
National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), Monash University, and Eastern Health.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36102776
pii: S2666-7568(22)00169-6
doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00169-6
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ANZCTR
['ACTRN12614000399695']

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e617-e627

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests WKS reports grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Monash University, and Eastern Health, during the conduct of the study. WKS has received honoraria for advisory board membership and speakers’ fees from Janssen, outside of the submitted work. IDD reports grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council, during the conduct of the study. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Wee Kheng Soo (WK)

Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia; Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia; Aged Medicine Program, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: kheng.soo@monash.edu.

Madeleine T King (MT)

School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Alun Pope (A)

Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.

Phillip Parente (P)

Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia; Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.

Pēteris Dārziņš (P)

Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia; Aged Medicine Program, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.

Ian D Davis (ID)

Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia; Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH