Massive crossover suppression by CRISPR-Cas-mediated plant chromosome engineering.
Journal
Nature plants
ISSN: 2055-0278
Titre abrégé: Nat Plants
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101651677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
13
01
2022
accepted:
02
07
2022
pubmed:
16
9
2022
medline:
21
10
2022
entrez:
15
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recent studies have demonstrated that not only genes but also entire chromosomes can be engineered using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPER-associated protein 9 (Cas9)
Identifiants
pubmed: 36109610
doi: 10.1038/s41477-022-01238-3
pii: 10.1038/s41477-022-01238-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1153-1159Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Schmidt, C. et al. Changing local recombination patterns in Arabidopsis by CRISPR/Cas mediated chromosome engineering. Nat. Commun. 11, 4418 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18277-z
Beying, N., Schmidt, C., Pacher, M., Houben, A. & Puchta, H. CRISPR–Cas9-mediated induction of heritable chromosomal translocations in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 6, 638–645 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0663-x
Lu, Y. et al. A donor-DNA-free CRISPR/Cas-based approach to gene knock-up in rice. Nat. Plants 7, 1445–1452 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-01019-4
Schwartz, C. et al. CRISPR–Cas9-mediated 75.5-Mb inversion in maize. Nat. Plants 6, 1427–1431 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-00817-6
Filler Hayut, S., Melamed Bessudo, C. & Levy, A. A. Targeted recombination between homologous chromosomes for precise breeding in tomato. Nat. Commun. 8, 15605 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms15605
Rönspies, M., Dorn, A., Schindele, P. & Puchta, H. CRISPR–Cas-mediated chromosome engineering for crop improvement and synthetic biology. Nat. Plants 7, 566–573 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00910-4
Gao, C. Genome engineering for crop improvement and future agriculture. Cell 184, 1621–1635 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.005
Molla, K. A., Qi, Y., Karmakar, S. & Baig, M. J. Base editing landscape extends to perform transversion mutation. Trends Genet. 36, 899–901 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.09.001
Atkins, P. A. & Voytas, D. F. Overcoming bottlenecks in plant gene editing. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 54, 79–84 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.01.002
Schindele, A., Dorn, A. & Puchta, H. CRISPR/Cas brings plant biology and breeding into the fast lane. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 61, 7–14 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.08.006
Lee, K. & Wang, K. Level up to chromosome restructuring. Nat. Plants 6, 600–601 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0669-4
Blary, A. & Jenczewski, E. Manipulation of crossover frequency and distribution for plant breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132, 575–592 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3240-1
Sturtevant, A. H. A case of rearrangement of genes in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 7, 235–237 (1921).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.7.8.235
Crown, K. N., Miller, D. E., Sekelsky, J. & Hawley, R. S. Local inversion heterozygosity alters recombination throughout the genome. Curr. Biol. 28, 2984–2990 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.004
Huang, K. & Rieseberg, L. H. Frequency, origins, and evolutionary role of chromosomal inversions in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 296 (2020).
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00296
Kirkpatrick, M. & Barton, N. Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 173, 419–434 (2006).
doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.047985
Coughlan, J. M. & Willis, J. H. Dissecting the role of a large chromosomal inversion in life history divergence throughout the Mimulus guttatus species complex. Mol. Ecol. 28, 1343–1357 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/mec.14804
Miller, D. E., Cook, K. R. & Hawley, R. S. The joy of balancers. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008421 (2019).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008421
Walkowiak, S. et al. Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding. Nature 588, 277–283 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2961-x
Jayakodi, M. et al. The barley pan-genome reveals the hidden legacy of mutation breeding. Nature 588, 284–289 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2947-8
Crow, T. et al. Gene regulatory effects of a large chromosomal inversion in highland maize. PLoS Genet. 16, e1009213 (2020).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009213
Liu, Y. et al. Pan-genome of wild and cultivated soybeans. Cell 182, 162–176 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.023
Alonge, M. et al. Major impacts of widespread structural variation on gene expression and crop improvement in tomato. Cell 182, 145–161 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.021
Qin, P. et al. Pan-genome analysis of 33 genetically diverse rice accessions reveals hidden genomic variations. Cell 184, 3542–3558 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.046
Fransz, P. et al. Molecular, genetic and evolutionary analysis of a paracentric inversion in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 88, 159–178 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/tpj.13262
Rönspies, M., Schindele, P., Wetzel, R. & Puchta, H. CRISPR–Cas9-mediated chromosome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Protoc. 17, 1332–1358 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41596-022-00686-7
Steinert, J., Schiml, S., Fauser, F. & Puchta, H. Highly efficient heritable plant genome engineering using Cas9 orthologues from Streptococcus thermophilus and Staphylococcus aureus. Plant J. 84, 1295–1305 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/tpj.13078
Beying, N., Schmidt, C., Pacher, M., Houben, A. & Puchta, H. CRISPR–Cas9-mediated induction of heritable chromosomal translocations in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 6, 638–645 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0663-x
Schmidt, C., Pacher, M. & Puchta, H. Efficient induction of heritable inversions in plant genomes using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant J. 98, 577–589 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/tpj.14322
Termolino, P. et al. Recombination suppression in heterozygotes for a pericentric inversion induces the interchromosomal effect on crossovers in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 100, 1163–1175 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/tpj.14505
Coyne, J. A., Aulard, S. & Berry, A. Lack of underdominance in a naturally occurring pericentric inversion in Drosophila melanogaster and its implications for chromosome evolution. Genetics 129, 791–802 (1991).
doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.791
Coyne, J. A., Meyers, W., Crittenden, A. P. & Sniegowski, P. The fertility effects of pericentric inversions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 134, 487–496 (1993).
doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.487
Lysak, M. A., Fransz, P. F., Ali, H. B. & Schubert, I. Chromosome painting in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 28, 689–697 (2001).
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01194.x