Exclusion of Disperse Orange 3 is possible from the textile dye mix present in the Swedish baseline patch test series. A study by the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
allergic contact dermatitis
contact allergy
delayed hypersensitivity
disperse dyes
patch testing
textile dermatitis
Journal
Contact dermatitis
ISSN: 1600-0536
Titre abrégé: Contact Dermatitis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7604950
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
revised:
12
09
2022
received:
04
07
2022
accepted:
13
09
2022
pubmed:
17
9
2022
medline:
21
12
2022
entrez:
16
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The textile dye mix (TDM) 6.6% in petrolatum contains Disperse Blue (DB) 35, Disperse Yellow 3, Disperse Orange (DO) 1 and 3, Disperse Red 1 and 17, and DB 106 and 124. The most frequent allergen in TDM-positive patients is DO 3. Around 85% of para-phenylenediamine (PPD)-allergic dermatitis patients have been positive to DO 3. There has been a discussion to exclude DO 3 from TDM 6.6% because of strong simultaneous reactions to TDM and PPD. To study if DO 3 can be excluded from TDM 6.6%. Patch tests were performed on 1481 dermatitis patients with TDM 6.6%, TDM 7.0% (without DO 3 but the other disperse dyes at 1.0% each), DO 3 1.0%, and PPD 1.0% pet. Contact allergy to TDM 6.6% was 3.6% and to TDM 7.0% was 3.0%. All 26 DO 3-positive patients were positive to PPD. The 44 patients positive to TDM 7.0% plus the 13 positive to PPD and TDM 6.6% but negative to TDM 7.0% were 57, outnumbering the 53 positive to TDM 6.6%. TDM 7.0% can replace TDM 6.6% in the Swedish baseline series, since TDM 7.0% together with PPD 1.0% will detect patients with textile dye allergy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The textile dye mix (TDM) 6.6% in petrolatum contains Disperse Blue (DB) 35, Disperse Yellow 3, Disperse Orange (DO) 1 and 3, Disperse Red 1 and 17, and DB 106 and 124. The most frequent allergen in TDM-positive patients is DO 3. Around 85% of para-phenylenediamine (PPD)-allergic dermatitis patients have been positive to DO 3. There has been a discussion to exclude DO 3 from TDM 6.6% because of strong simultaneous reactions to TDM and PPD.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To study if DO 3 can be excluded from TDM 6.6%.
METHODS
METHODS
Patch tests were performed on 1481 dermatitis patients with TDM 6.6%, TDM 7.0% (without DO 3 but the other disperse dyes at 1.0% each), DO 3 1.0%, and PPD 1.0% pet.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Contact allergy to TDM 6.6% was 3.6% and to TDM 7.0% was 3.0%. All 26 DO 3-positive patients were positive to PPD. The 44 patients positive to TDM 7.0% plus the 13 positive to PPD and TDM 6.6% but negative to TDM 7.0% were 57, outnumbering the 53 positive to TDM 6.6%.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
TDM 7.0% can replace TDM 6.6% in the Swedish baseline series, since TDM 7.0% together with PPD 1.0% will detect patients with textile dye allergy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36112512
doi: 10.1111/cod.14223
pmc: PMC10091765
doi:
Substances chimiques
Disperse Orange 3
B7J3O076OT
Disperse Orange 1
1592R4P97H
Coloring Agents
0
disperse blue 35
12222-75-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
54-59Subventions
Organisme : HudFonden
Organisme : Finsen Foundation
Organisme : Edvard Welander Foundation
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Acta Derm Venereol. 2015 Apr;95(4):427-31
pubmed: 25166030
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 17;9(7):e101717
pubmed: 25032825
Acta Derm Venereol. 2011 Jun;91(4):422-7
pubmed: 21547346
Contact Dermatitis. 2020 Nov;83(5):387-390
pubmed: 32666533
Dermatitis. 2020 Jan/Feb;31(1):e5-e7
pubmed: 31905185
Contact Dermatitis. 2014 Oct;71(4):215-23
pubmed: 24815318
Br J Dermatol. 2006 Apr;154(4):665-70
pubmed: 16536809
Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Aug;51(2):96-7
pubmed: 15373858
Contact Dermatitis. 2008 Mar;58(3):182-3
pubmed: 18279168
Contact Dermatitis. 1997 Feb;36(2):91-6
pubmed: 9062744
Contact Dermatitis. 2023 Jan;88(1):54-59
pubmed: 36112512
Contact Dermatitis. 2022 Oct;87(4):315-324
pubmed: 35611449
Contact Dermatitis. 2005 Sep;53(3):185
pubmed: 16128773
Contact Dermatitis. 2015 Oct;73(4):195-221
pubmed: 26179009
Contact Dermatitis. 2003 May;48(5):248-50
pubmed: 12868964
Dermatitis. 2015 Jul-Aug;26(4):170-6
pubmed: 26172486
Toxicol Lett. 2006 Mar 15;162(1):49-54
pubmed: 16361071
Contact Dermatitis. 2015 Jul;73(1):15-20
pubmed: 25925831
Contact Dermatitis. 1998 Aug;39(2):79-81
pubmed: 9746187
Clin Dermatol. 2011 May-Jun;29(3):316-24
pubmed: 21496741
Environ Pollut. 2021 Oct 15;287:117299
pubmed: 34023658
Contact Dermatitis. 2019 Jul;81(1):1-8
pubmed: 30684277
Contact Dermatitis. 2018 May;78(5):335-340
pubmed: 29392743
Contact Dermatitis. 2007 May;56(5):281-5
pubmed: 17441852