Clinical outcomes and health care costs among people entering a safer opioid supply program in Ontario.
Journal
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne
ISSN: 1488-2329
Titre abrégé: CMAJ
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 9711805
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 09 2022
19 09 2022
Historique:
accepted:
23
08
2022
entrez:
19
9
2022
pubmed:
20
9
2022
medline:
23
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
London InterCommunity Health Centre (LIHC) launched a safer opioid supply (SOS) program in 2016, where clients are prescribed pharmaceutical opioids and provided with comprehensive health and social supports. We sought to evaluate the impact of this program on health services utilization and health care costs. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis of London, Ontario, residents who received a diagnosis of opioid use disorder (OUD) and who entered the SOS program between January 2016 and March 2019, and a comparison group of individuals matched on demographic and clinical characteristics who were not exposed to the program. Primary outcomes were emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, admissions for infections and health care costs. We used autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to evaluate the impact of SOS initiation and compared outcome rates in the year before and after cohort entry. In the time series analysis, rates of ED visits (-14 visits/100, 95% confidence interval [CI] -26 to -2; Although additional research is needed, this preliminary evidence indicates that SOS programs can play an important role in the expansion of treatment and harm-reduction options available to assist people who use drugs and who are at high risk of drug poisoning.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
London InterCommunity Health Centre (LIHC) launched a safer opioid supply (SOS) program in 2016, where clients are prescribed pharmaceutical opioids and provided with comprehensive health and social supports. We sought to evaluate the impact of this program on health services utilization and health care costs.
METHODS
We conducted an interrupted time series analysis of London, Ontario, residents who received a diagnosis of opioid use disorder (OUD) and who entered the SOS program between January 2016 and March 2019, and a comparison group of individuals matched on demographic and clinical characteristics who were not exposed to the program. Primary outcomes were emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, admissions for infections and health care costs. We used autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to evaluate the impact of SOS initiation and compared outcome rates in the year before and after cohort entry.
RESULTS
In the time series analysis, rates of ED visits (-14 visits/100, 95% confidence interval [CI] -26 to -2;
INTERPRETATION
Although additional research is needed, this preliminary evidence indicates that SOS programs can play an important role in the expansion of treatment and harm-reduction options available to assist people who use drugs and who are at high risk of drug poisoning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36122919
pii: 194/36/E1233
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.220892
pmc: PMC9484622
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Pharmaceutical Preparations
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
E1233-E1242Informations de copyright
© 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: Tara Gomes reports receiving grants paid to support the research program from the Ontario Ministry of Health, a grant paid to support the conduct of the study from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and Canada Research Chair funding for salary support. Andrea Sereda is the medical lead in the Safer Opioid Supply program based out of the London InterCommunity Health Centre (LIHC). Dr. Sereda has also received support for attending meetings or travel from the LIHC (as an employee). Gillian Kolla is supported by a Banting postdoctoral fellowship from the CIHR and a postdoctoral fellowship from the Canadian Network on Hepatitis C. Separate from this study, Dr. Kolla received funding from LIHC’s Substance Use and Addictions Program grant to conduct an independent preliminary evaluation of the Safer Opioid Supply program. No other competing interests were declared.
Références
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Apr;102:103601
pubmed: 35124413
CMAJ. 2020 Mar 2;192(9):E219-E220
pubmed: 32122979
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Jun;80:102769
pubmed: 32446183
Healthc Q. 2019 Oct;22(3):6-11
pubmed: 31845850
Addiction. 2021 Jun;116(6):1514-1520
pubmed: 33207025
Can J Public Health. 2021 Aug;112(4):733-736
pubmed: 33782915
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 May 1;73(5):447-55
pubmed: 27049826
CMAJ. 2019 Sep 23;191(38):E1049-E1056
pubmed: 31548191
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 18;14(10):e0223589
pubmed: 31626648
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Sep;81(5):556-560
pubmed: 33028465
J Addict Med. 2022 Jul-Aug 01;16(4):433-439
pubmed: 34711742
N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20;361(8):777-86
pubmed: 19692689
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Sep;71:178-182
pubmed: 30975595
Addiction. 2019 Sep;114(9):1602-1613
pubmed: 31166621
BMJ. 2005 Apr 23;330(7497):960-2
pubmed: 15845982
Am J Public Health. 2022 Apr;112(S2):S151-S158
pubmed: 35262376
Harm Reduct J. 2017 May 18;14(1):28
pubmed: 28521829
CMAJ Open. 2021 Feb 23;9(1):E115-E124
pubmed: 33622764