SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5: Evolving tropism and evasion of potent humoral responses and resistance to clinical immunotherapeutics relative to viral variants of concern.
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2
/ genetics
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Antibodies, Neutralizing
Antibodies, Viral
/ metabolism
Antiviral Agents
Australia
BNT162 Vaccine
Benzamidines
COVID-19
/ therapy
Guanidines
Humans
Immunization, Passive
Immunoglobulin G
Immunotherapy
SARS-CoV-2
/ genetics
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
/ genetics
Tropism
COVID-19 Serotherapy
ACE2
BA.2
BA.5
Neutralising antibodies
Omicron BA.1
SARS-CoV-2
TMPRSS2
Journal
EBioMedicine
ISSN: 2352-3964
Titre abrégé: EBioMedicine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101647039
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
07
07
2022
revised:
09
08
2022
accepted:
02
09
2022
pubmed:
22
9
2022
medline:
19
10
2022
entrez:
21
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Genetically distinct viral variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been recorded since January 2020. The introduction of global vaccine programs has contributed to lower COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality rates, particularly in developed countries. In late 2021, Omicron BA.1 emerged, with substantially altered genetic differences and clinical effects from other variants of concern. Shortly after dominating global spread in early 2022, BA.1 was supplanted by the genetically distinct Omicron lineage BA.2. A sub-lineage of BA.2, designated BA.5, presently has an outgrowth advantage over BA.2 and other BA.2 sub-lineages. Here we study the neutralisation of Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 and pre-Omicron variants using a range of vaccine and convalescent sera and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies using a live virus neutralisation assay. Using primary nasopharyngeal swabs, we also tested the relative fitness of BA.5 compared to pre-Omicron and Omicron viral lineages in their ability to use the ACE2-TMPRSS2 pathway. Using low passage clinical isolates of Clade A.2.2, Beta, Delta, BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5, we determined humoral neutralisation in vitro in vaccinated and convalescent cohorts, using concentrated human IgG pooled from thousands of plasma donors, and licensed monoclonal antibody therapies. We then determined infectivity to particle ratios in primary nasopharyngeal samples and expanded low passage isolates in a genetically engineered ACE2/TMPRSS2 cell line in the presence and absence of the TMPRSS2 inhibitor Nafamostat. Peak responses to 3 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine were associated with a 9-fold reduction in neutralisation for Omicron lineages BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5. Concentrated pooled human IgG from convalescent and vaccinated donors and BNT162b2 vaccination with BA.1 breakthrough infections were associated with greater breadth of neutralisation, although the potency was still reduced 7-fold across all Omicron lineages. Testing of clinical grade antibodies revealed a 14.3-fold reduction using Evusheld and 16.8-fold reduction using Sotrovimab for the BA.5. Whilst the infectivity of BA.1 and BA.2 was attenuated in ACE2/TMPRSS2 entry, BA.5 was observed to be equivalent to that of an early 2020 circulating clade and had greater sensitivity to the TMPRSS2 inhibitor Nafamostat. Observations support all Omicron variants to significantly escape neutralising antibodies across a range of vaccination and/or convalescent responses. Potency of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies is also reduced and differs across Omicron lineages. The key difference of BA.5 from other Omicron sub-variants is the reversion in tropism back to using the well-known ACE2-TMPRSS2 pathway, utilised efficiently by pre-Omicron lineages. Monitoring if these changes influence transmission and/or disease severity will be key for ongoing tracking and management of Omicron waves globally. This work was primarily supported by Australian Medical Foundation research grants MRF2005760 (ST, GM & WDR), MRF2001684 (ADK and ST) and Medical Research Future Fund Antiviral Development Call grant (WDR), Medical Research Future Fund COVID-19 grant (MRFF2001684, ADK & SGT) and the New South Wales Health COVID-19 Research Grants Round 2 (SGT).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Genetically distinct viral variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been recorded since January 2020. The introduction of global vaccine programs has contributed to lower COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality rates, particularly in developed countries. In late 2021, Omicron BA.1 emerged, with substantially altered genetic differences and clinical effects from other variants of concern. Shortly after dominating global spread in early 2022, BA.1 was supplanted by the genetically distinct Omicron lineage BA.2. A sub-lineage of BA.2, designated BA.5, presently has an outgrowth advantage over BA.2 and other BA.2 sub-lineages. Here we study the neutralisation of Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 and pre-Omicron variants using a range of vaccine and convalescent sera and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies using a live virus neutralisation assay. Using primary nasopharyngeal swabs, we also tested the relative fitness of BA.5 compared to pre-Omicron and Omicron viral lineages in their ability to use the ACE2-TMPRSS2 pathway.
METHODS
METHODS
Using low passage clinical isolates of Clade A.2.2, Beta, Delta, BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5, we determined humoral neutralisation in vitro in vaccinated and convalescent cohorts, using concentrated human IgG pooled from thousands of plasma donors, and licensed monoclonal antibody therapies. We then determined infectivity to particle ratios in primary nasopharyngeal samples and expanded low passage isolates in a genetically engineered ACE2/TMPRSS2 cell line in the presence and absence of the TMPRSS2 inhibitor Nafamostat.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
Peak responses to 3 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine were associated with a 9-fold reduction in neutralisation for Omicron lineages BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5. Concentrated pooled human IgG from convalescent and vaccinated donors and BNT162b2 vaccination with BA.1 breakthrough infections were associated with greater breadth of neutralisation, although the potency was still reduced 7-fold across all Omicron lineages. Testing of clinical grade antibodies revealed a 14.3-fold reduction using Evusheld and 16.8-fold reduction using Sotrovimab for the BA.5. Whilst the infectivity of BA.1 and BA.2 was attenuated in ACE2/TMPRSS2 entry, BA.5 was observed to be equivalent to that of an early 2020 circulating clade and had greater sensitivity to the TMPRSS2 inhibitor Nafamostat.
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
Observations support all Omicron variants to significantly escape neutralising antibodies across a range of vaccination and/or convalescent responses. Potency of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies is also reduced and differs across Omicron lineages. The key difference of BA.5 from other Omicron sub-variants is the reversion in tropism back to using the well-known ACE2-TMPRSS2 pathway, utilised efficiently by pre-Omicron lineages. Monitoring if these changes influence transmission and/or disease severity will be key for ongoing tracking and management of Omicron waves globally.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
This work was primarily supported by Australian Medical Foundation research grants MRF2005760 (ST, GM & WDR), MRF2001684 (ADK and ST) and Medical Research Future Fund Antiviral Development Call grant (WDR), Medical Research Future Fund COVID-19 grant (MRFF2001684, ADK & SGT) and the New South Wales Health COVID-19 Research Grants Round 2 (SGT).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36130476
pii: S2352-3964(22)00452-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104270
pmc: PMC9482529
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Antibodies, Neutralizing
0
Antibodies, Viral
0
Antiviral Agents
0
Benzamidines
0
Guanidines
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
0
spike protein, SARS-CoV-2
0
sotrovimab
1MTK0BPN8V
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2
EC 3.4.17.23
BNT162 Vaccine
N38TVC63NU
nafamostat
Y25LQ0H97D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104270Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests A.O.S contributed to this manuscript in his capacity as adjunct associate lecturer (from January 2022) at the University of New South Wales. Since January 2022, A.O.S is an employee of GlaxoSmithKline Australia (medical science liaison for COVID-19).
Références
Nature. 2022 Feb;602(7897):487-495
pubmed: 34942634
Cell. 2022 Feb 3;185(3):467-484.e15
pubmed: 35081335
Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7902):706-714
pubmed: 35104837
Nat Med. 2022 Sep;28(9):1785-1790
pubmed: 35760080
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022 Dec;11(1):277-283
pubmed: 34951565
Lancet. 2021 Apr 10;397(10282):1347-1348
pubmed: 33770519
Nat Commun. 2023 Mar 23;14(1):1620
pubmed: 36959194
Cell Rep. 2022 Jun 28;39(13):111009
pubmed: 35732171
Biologicals. 2008 Jul;36(4):239-47
pubmed: 18337119
Nature. 2021 Nov;599(7883):114-119
pubmed: 34488225
PLoS Med. 2021 Jul 6;18(7):e1003656
pubmed: 34228725
Cell. 2022 Jul 7;185(14):2422-2433.e13
pubmed: 35772405
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;22(8):1117-1118
pubmed: 35777385
Nature. 2020 Jul;583(7815):290-295
pubmed: 32422645
Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2019 Dec 24;17:209-219
pubmed: 31970199
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 23;12(1):12609
pubmed: 35871089
EMBO J. 2021 Dec 15;40(24):e108944
pubmed: 34601723
Science. 2022 Aug 19;377(6608):890-894
pubmed: 35857529
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 8;12(1):3431
pubmed: 34103499
J Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 22;224(10):1707-1711
pubmed: 34543421
Nature. 2022 Aug;608(7923):593-602
pubmed: 35714668
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022 Mar 9;7(1):76
pubmed: 35264568
Cell Host Microbe. 2022 Sep 14;30(9):1231-1241.e6
pubmed: 35921836
Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7902):700-705
pubmed: 35104835
Nature. 2022 Aug;608(7923):603-608
pubmed: 35790190
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Feb;23(2):167-176
pubmed: 36270311
N Engl J Med. 2022 Aug 4;387(5):468-470
pubmed: 35857646
Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7902):687-692
pubmed: 35062015
Nature. 2022 Jan;601(7892):177
pubmed: 34987210
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 9;11(1):6272
pubmed: 33298935
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022 May 7;7(1):151
pubmed: 35525870
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 7;387(1):86-88
pubmed: 35731894
Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7902):715-720
pubmed: 35104836
Science. 2021 Dec 24;374(6575):1626-1632
pubmed: 34735219
World J Virol. 2016 May 12;5(2):85-6
pubmed: 27175354
Nat Microbiol. 2022 Jun;7(6):896-908
pubmed: 35637329
Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7902):693-699
pubmed: 35062016