Relapse of first-episode schizophrenia patients and neurocognitive impairment: The role of dopaminergic and anticholinergic burden.

BACKGROUND

The prevention of relapse may be a key factor to diminish the cognitive impairment of first-episode schizophrenia (FES) patients. We aimed to ascertain the effects of relapse, and dopaminergic and anticholinergic treatment burdens on cognitive functioning in the follow-up.

METHODS

Ninety-nine FES patients participated in this study. Cognitive assessments were performed at baseline and after 3 years of follow-up or, in those patients who relapsed, after >2 months of stabilization of the new acute psychotic episode. The primary outcomes were final cognitive dimensions.

RESULTS

Repeated measures MANOVA analyses showed improvements in the whole sample on the end-point assessments in processing speed and social cognition. However, only impairment in social cognition showed a significant interaction with relapse by time in this sample. Relapse in FES patients was significantly associated with poor performance on end-point assessments of working memory, social cognition and global cognitive score. Anticholinergic burden, but not dopaminergic burden, was associated with verbal memory impairment. These significant associations resulted after controlling for baseline cognitive functioning, relapse and dopaminergic burden.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between relapse and cognitive impairment in recovered FES patients seems to be particularly complex at the short-term follow-up of these patients. While relapse was associated with working memory, social cognition impairments and global cognitive score, anticholinergic burden might play an additional worsening effect on verbal memory. Thus, tailoring or changing antipsychotics and other drugs to reduce their anticholinergic burden may be a potential modifiable factor to diminish cognitive impairment at this stage of the illness.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest Dr. R. Rodriguez-Jimenez has been a consultant for, spoken in activities of, or received grants from: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid Regional Government (S2010/ BMD-2422 AGES; S2017/BMD-3740), JanssenCilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Ferrer, Juste, Takeda, Exeltis, Casen-Recordati, Angelini. A. Ibáñez has received research support from or served as speaker or advisor for Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck and Otsuka. C. De-la-Camara received financial support to attend scientific meetings from Janssen, Almirall, Lilly, Lundbeck, Rovi, Esteve, Novartis, Astrazeneca, Pfizer and Casen Recordati. Dr. A. Gonzalez-Pinto has received grants and served as consultant, advisor or CME speaker for the following entities: Almirall, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cephalon, Eli Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen-Cilag, Ferrer, Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, Merck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Shering-Plough, Solvay, the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (CIBERSAM), the Ministry of Science (Carlos III Institute), the Basque Government, the Stanley Medical Research Institute, Wyeth, Angelini, Exeltis, Casen and Servier. Dr. Bernardo has been a consultant for, received grant/research support and honoraria from, and been on the speakers/advisory board of ABBiotics, Adamed, Angelini, Casen Recordati, Janssen-Cilag, Menarini, Rovi and Takeda.