EANM guidelines for PET-CT and PET-MR routine quality control.
Guidelines
PET-CT
PET-MR
Quality control
Journal
Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik
ISSN: 1876-4436
Titre abrégé: Z Med Phys
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 100886455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
29
07
2022
accepted:
25
08
2022
pubmed:
28
9
2022
medline:
28
3
2023
entrez:
27
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We present guidelines by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) for routine quality control (QC) of PET-CT and PET-MR systems. These guidelines are partially based on the current EANM guidelines for routine quality control of Nuclear Medicine instrumentation but focus more on the inherent multimodal aspect of the current, state-of-the-art PET-CT and PET-MR scanners. We briefly discuss the regulatory context put forward by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and European Commission (EC) and consider relevant guidelines and recommendations by other societies and professional organizations. As such, a comprehensive overview of recommended quality control procedures is provided to ensure the optimal operational status of a PET system, integrated with either a CT or MR system. In doing so, we also discuss the rationale of the different tests, advice on the frequency of each test and present the relevant MR and CT tests for an integrated system. In addition, we recommend a scheme of preventive actions to avoid QC tests from drifting out of the predefined range of acceptable performance values such that an optimal performance of the PET system is maintained for routine clinical use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36167600
pii: S0939-3889(22)00089-7
doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.08.003
pmc: PMC10068535
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103-113Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier GmbH.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Med Phys. 2021 Feb;48(2):e31-e35
pubmed: 33320364
Med Phys. 2018 Jun 3;:
pubmed: 29862522
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020 Apr;39(4):952-963
pubmed: 31478844
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Mar;45(3):412-422
pubmed: 29192365
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Jul;45(8):1344-1361
pubmed: 29500480
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Mar;37(3):662-71
pubmed: 20130859
MAGMA. 2013 Feb;26(1):159-71
pubmed: 23053713
Br J Radiol. 2000 Apr;73(868):376-83
pubmed: 10844863
Med Phys. 2019 Nov;46(11):e735-e756
pubmed: 31408540
Med Phys. 2012 Apr;39(4):1946-63
pubmed: 22482616
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug;44(Suppl 1):17-31
pubmed: 28623376
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Mar 13;13:21-27
pubmed: 33458303
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Mar 15;103(4):994-1003
pubmed: 30496879
Radiology. 2021 Feb;298(2):248-260
pubmed: 33350894
Nucl Med Biol. 2000 Oct;27(7):643-6
pubmed: 11091106