The three-dimensional landscape of cortical chromatin accessibility in Alzheimer's disease.
Journal
Nature neuroscience
ISSN: 1546-1726
Titre abrégé: Nat Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9809671
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
16
03
2021
accepted:
16
08
2022
pubmed:
29
9
2022
medline:
12
10
2022
entrez:
28
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To characterize the dysregulation of chromatin accessibility in Alzheimer's disease (AD), we generated 636 ATAC-seq libraries from neuronal and nonneuronal nuclei isolated from the superior temporal gyrus and entorhinal cortex of 153 AD cases and 56 controls. By analyzing a total of ~20 billion read pairs, we expanded the repertoire of known open chromatin regions (OCRs) in the human brain and identified cell-type-specific enhancer-promoter interactions. We show that interindividual variability in OCRs can be leveraged to identify cis-regulatory domains (CRDs) that capture the three-dimensional structure of the genome (3D genome). We identified AD-associated effects on chromatin accessibility, the 3D genome and transcription factor (TF) regulatory networks. For one of the most AD-perturbed TFs, USF2, we validated its regulatory effect on lysosomal genes. Overall, we applied a systematic approach to understanding the role of the 3D genome in AD. We provide all data as an online resource for widespread community-based analysis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36171428
doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01166-7
pii: 10.1038/s41593-022-01166-7
pmc: PMC9581463
mid: NIHMS1836630
doi:
Substances chimiques
Chromatin
0
Transcription Factors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1366-1378Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH109897
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG050986
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM062754
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH106056
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG067025
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG065582
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH121074
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R56 MH101454
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : S10 OD018522
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : S10 OD026880
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Références
Andrews, S. J., Fulton-Howard, B. & Goate, A. Interpretation of risk loci from genome-wide association studies of Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 19, 326–335 (2020).
pubmed: 31986256
pmcid: 8176461
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30435-1
Marzi, S. J. et al. A histone acetylome-wide association study of Alzheimer’s disease identifies disease-associated H3K27ac differences in the entorhinal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1618–1627 (2018).
pubmed: 30349106
doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0253-7
Klein, H.-U. et al. Epigenome-wide study uncovers large-scale changes in histone acetylation driven by tau pathology in aging and Alzheimer’s human brains. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 37–46 (2019).
pubmed: 30559478
doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0291-1
Gasparoni, G. et al. DNA methylation analysis on purified neurons and glia dissects age and Alzheimer’s disease-specific changes in the human cortex. Epigenet. Chromatin 11, 41 (2018).
doi: 10.1186/s13072-018-0211-3
Li, P. et al. Epigenetic dysregulation of enhancers in neurons is associated with Alzheimer’s disease pathology and cognitive symptoms. Nat. Commun. 10, 2246 (2019).
pubmed: 31113950
pmcid: 6529540
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10101-7
Raj, T. et al. Integrative transcriptome analyses of the aging brain implicate altered splicing in Alzheimer’s disease susceptibility. Nat. Genet. 50, 1584–1592 (2018).
pubmed: 30297968
pmcid: 6354244
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0238-1
Nott, A. et al. Brain cell type-specific enhancer–promoter interactome maps and disease-risk association. Science 366, 1134–1139 (2019).
pubmed: 31727856
pmcid: 7028213
doi: 10.1126/science.aay0793
Kozlenkov, A. et al. Substantial DNA methylation differences between two major neuronal subtypes in human brain. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 2593–2612 (2016).
pubmed: 26612861
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1304
Wang, M. et al. The Mount Sinai cohort of large-scale genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Data 5, 180185 (2018).
pubmed: 30204156
pmcid: 6132187
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.185
Fillenbaum, G. G. et al. Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD): the first twenty years. Alzheimers Dement. 4, 96–109 (2008).
pubmed: 18631955
pmcid: 2808763
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.08.005
Braak, H. & Braak, E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 82, 239–259 (1991).
pubmed: 1759558
doi: 10.1007/BF00308809
Braak, H., Alafuzoff, I., Arzberger, T., Kretzschmar, H. & Del Tredici, K. Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol. 112, 389–404 (2006).
pubmed: 16906426
pmcid: 3906709
doi: 10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z
Morris, J. C. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 43, 2412–2414 (1993).
pubmed: 8232972
doi: 10.1212/WNL.43.11.2412-a
Nelson, P. T. et al. Correlation of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes with cognitive status: a review of the literature. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 71, 362–381 (2012).
pubmed: 22487856
doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31825018f7
Fullard, J. F. et al. An atlas of chromatin accessibility in the adult human brain. Genome Res. 28, 1243–1252 (2018).
pubmed: 29945882
pmcid: 6071637
doi: 10.1101/gr.232488.117
Hauberg, M. E. et al. Common schizophrenia risk variants are enriched in open chromatin regions of human glutamatergic neurons. Nat. Commun. 11, 5581 (2020).
pubmed: 33149216
pmcid: 7643171
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19319-2
Hu, B. et al. Neuronal and glial 3D chromatin architecture informs the cellular etiology of brain disorders. Nat. Commun. 12, 3968 (2021).
pubmed: 34172755
pmcid: 8233376
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24243-0
Hoffman, G. E. & Schadt, E. E. variancePartition: interpreting drivers of variation in complex gene expression studies. BMC Bioinformatics 17, 483 (2016).
pubmed: 27884101
pmcid: 5123296
doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1323-z
Fulco, C. P. et al. Activity-by-contact model of enhancer–promoter regulation from thousands of CRISPR perturbations. Nat. Genet. 51, 1664–1669 (2019).
pubmed: 31784727
pmcid: 6886585
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0538-0
Mifsud, B. et al. Mapping long-range promoter contacts in human cells with high-resolution capture Hi-C. Nat. Genet. 47, 598–606 (2015).
pubmed: 25938943
doi: 10.1038/ng.3286
Corces, M. R. et al. Single-cell epigenomic analyses implicate candidate causal variants at inherited risk loci for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Nat. Genet. 52, 1158–1168 (2020).
pubmed: 33106633
pmcid: 7606627
doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00721-x
Hormozdiari, F. et al. Leveraging molecular quantitative trait loci to understand the genetic architecture of diseases and complex traits. Nat. Genet. 50, 1041–1047 (2018).
pubmed: 29942083
pmcid: 6030458
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0148-2
Pickar-Oliver, A. & Gersbach, C. A. The next generation of CRISPR–Cas technologies and applications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 490–507 (2019).
pubmed: 31147612
pmcid: 7079207
doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0131-5
Wang, M. et al. Integrative network analysis of nineteen brain regions identifies molecular signatures and networks underlying selective regional vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease. Genome Med. 8, 104 (2016).
pubmed: 27799057
pmcid: 5088659
doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0355-3
Khan, U. A. et al. Molecular drivers and cortical spread of lateral entorhinal cortex dysfunction in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 304–311 (2014).
pubmed: 24362760
doi: 10.1038/nn.3606
Barrera, J. et al. Sex dependent glial-specific changes in the chromatin accessibility landscape in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease brains. Mol. Neurodegener. 16, 58 (2021).
pubmed: 34429139
pmcid: 8383438
doi: 10.1186/s13024-021-00481-0
Bowles, K. et al. 17q21.31 sub-haplotypes underlying H1-associated risk for Parkinson’s disease are associated with LRRC37A/2 expression in astrocytes. Mol. Neurodegener. 16, 1–21 (2022).
Jansen, I. E. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk. Nat. Genet. 51, 404–413 (2019).
pubmed: 30617256
pmcid: 6836675
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0311-9
Finucane, H. K. et al. Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics. Nat. Genet. 47, 1228–1235 (2015).
pubmed: 26414678
pmcid: 4626285
doi: 10.1038/ng.3404
Kunkle, B. W. et al. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 51, 414–430 (2019).
pubmed: 30820047
pmcid: 6463297
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0358-2
Yokoyama, K. et al. NYAP: a phosphoprotein family that links PI3K to WAVE1 signalling in neurons. EMBO J. 30, 4739–4754 (2011).
pubmed: 21946561
pmcid: 3243607
doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.348
Chen, X. et al. Cholecystokinin release triggered by NMDA receptors produces LTP and sound–sound associative memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 6397–6406 (2019).
pubmed: 30850520
pmcid: 6442640
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816833116
Li, X., Long, J., He, T., Belshaw, R. & Scott, J. Integrated genomic approaches identify major pathways and upstream regulators in late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep. 5, 12393 (2015).
pubmed: 26202100
pmcid: 4511863
doi: 10.1038/srep12393
Castillo, E. et al. Comparative profiling of cortical gene expression in Alzheimer’s disease patients and mouse models demonstrates a link between amyloidosis and neuroinflammation. Sci. Rep. 7, 17762 (2017).
pubmed: 29259249
pmcid: 5736730
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17999-3
Hokama, M. et al. Altered expression of diabetes-related genes in Alzheimer’s disease brains: the Hisayama study. Cereb. Cortex 24, 2476–2488 (2014).
pubmed: 23595620
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht101
Chan, P. M. & Manser, E. PAKs in human disease. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 106, 171–187 (2012).
pubmed: 22340718
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-396456-4.00011-0
Bell, R. D. & Zlokovic, B. V. Neurovascular mechanisms and blood–brain barrier disorder in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 118, 103–113 (2009).
pubmed: 19319544
pmcid: 2853006
doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0522-3
Yuan, Z. et al. Regulation of neuronal cell death by MST1–FOXO1 signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 11285–11292 (2009).
pubmed: 19221179
pmcid: 2670133
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M900461200
Greer, E. L. & Brunet, A. FOXO transcription factors at the interface between longevity and tumor suppression. Oncogene 24, 7410–7425 (2005).
pubmed: 16288288
doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209086
Webb, A. E., Kundaje, A. & Brunet, A. Characterization of the direct targets of FOXO transcription factors throughout evolution. Aging Cell 15, 673–685 (2016).
pubmed: 27061590
pmcid: 4933671
doi: 10.1111/acel.12479
Koopmans, F. et al. SynGO: an evidence-based, expert-curated knowledge base for the synapse. Neuron 103, 217–234 (2019).
pubmed: 31171447
pmcid: 6764089
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.002
Bentsen, M. et al. ATAC-seq footprinting unravels kinetics of transcription factor binding during zygotic genome activation. Nat. Commun. 11, 4267 (2020).
pubmed: 32848148
pmcid: 7449963
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18035-1
Rahman, M. R. et al. Network-based approach to identify molecular signatures and therapeutic agents in Alzheimer’s disease. Comput. Biol. Chem. 78, 431–439 (2019).
pubmed: 30606694
doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2018.12.011
Acquaah-Mensah, G. K. & Taylor, R. C. Brain in situ hybridization maps as a source for reverse-engineering transcriptional regulatory networks: Alzheimer’s disease insights. Gene 586, 77–86 (2016).
pubmed: 27050105
doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.03.045
Qin, L. et al. Ethnicity-specific and overlapping alterations of brain hydroxymethylome in Alzheimer’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 29, 149–158 (2020).
pubmed: 31814020
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddz273
Malik, B. R., Maddison, D. C., Smith, G. A. & Peters, O. M. Autophagic and endo-lysosomal dysfunction in neurodegenerative disease. Mol. Brain 12, 100 (2019).
pubmed: 31783880
pmcid: 6884906
doi: 10.1186/s13041-019-0504-x
Yamanaka, T. et al. Genome-wide analyses in neuronal cells reveal that upstream transcription factors regulate lysosomal gene expression. FEBS J. 283, 1077–1087 (2016).
pubmed: 26756308
doi: 10.1111/febs.13650
Johnson, D. E., Ostrowski, P., Jaumouillé, V. & Grinstein, S. The position of lysosomes within the cell determines their luminal pH. J. Cell Biol. 212, 677–692 (2016).
pubmed: 26975849
pmcid: 4792074
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201507112
Hayek, S. R., Rane, H. S. & Parra, K. J. Reciprocal regulation of v-ATPase and glycolytic pathway elements in health and disease. Front. Physiol. 10, 127 (2019).
pubmed: 30828305
pmcid: 6384264
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00127
Couoh-Cardel, S., Milgrom, E. & Wilkens, S. Affinity purification and structural features of the yeast vacuolar ATPase V0 membrane sector. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 27959–27971 (2015).
pubmed: 26416888
pmcid: 4646912
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.662494
Delaneau, O. et al. Chromatin three-dimensional interactions mediate genetic effects on gene expression. Science 364, eaat8266 (2019).
pubmed: 31048460
doi: 10.1126/science.aat8266
Ambroise, C., Dehman, A., Neuvial, P., Rigaill, G. & Vialaneix, N. Adjacency-constrained hierarchical clustering of a band similarity matrix with application to genomics. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 14, 22 (2019).
pubmed: 31807137
pmcid: 6857244
doi: 10.1186/s13015-019-0157-4
Hoffman, G. E., Bendl, J., Girdhar, K. & Roussos, P. decorate: differential epigenetic correlation test. Bioinformatics 36, 2856–2861 (2020).
pubmed: 32003784
pmcid: 7203736
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa067
Rao, S. S. P. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014).
pubmed: 25497547
pmcid: 5635824
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021
Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).
pubmed: 19815776
pmcid: 2858594
doi: 10.1126/science.1181369
De Jager, P. L. et al. A multi-omic atlas of the human frontal cortex for aging and Alzheimer’s disease research. Sci. Data 5, 180142 (2018).
pubmed: 30084846
pmcid: 6080491
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.142
Meuleman, W. et al. Constitutive nuclear lamina–genome interactions are highly conserved and associated with A/T-rich sequence. Genome Res. 23, 270–280 (2013).
pubmed: 23124521
pmcid: 3561868
doi: 10.1101/gr.141028.112
Roadmap Epigenomics Consortiumet al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518, 317–330 (2015).
pmcid: 4530010
doi: 10.1038/nature14248
Corces, M.R. et al. The chromatin accessibility landscape of primary human cancers. Science 362, eaav1898 (2018).
pubmed: 30361341
pmcid: 6408149
doi: 10.1126/science.aav1898
Ishizuka, Y. & Hanamura, K. Drebrin in Alzheimer’s disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1006, 203–223 (2017).
pubmed: 28865022
doi: 10.1007/978-4-431-56550-5_12
Turi, Z., Lacey, M., Mistrik, M. & Moudry, P. Impaired ribosome biogenesis: mechanisms and relevance to cancer and aging. Aging 11, 2512–2540 (2019).
pubmed: 31026227
pmcid: 6520011
doi: 10.18632/aging.101922
Chambers, D. M., Peters, J. & Abbott, C. M. The lethal mutation of the mouse wasted (wst) is a deletion that abolishes expression of a tissue-specific isoform of translation elongation factor 1α, encoded by the Eef1a2 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 4463–4468 (1998).
pubmed: 9539760
pmcid: 22512
doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4463
Zeisel, A. et al. Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 347, 1138–1142 (2015).
pubmed: 25700174
doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1934
Zhang, W. et al. Integrative transcriptome imputation reveals tissue-specific and shared biological mechanisms mediating susceptibility to complex traits. Nat. Commun. 10, 3834 (2019).
pubmed: 31444360
pmcid: 6707297
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11874-7
Ernst, J. & Kellis, M. Chromatin-state discovery and genome annotation with ChromHMM. Nat. Protoc. 12, 2478–2492 (2017).
pubmed: 29120462
pmcid: 5945550
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.124
Meuleman, W. et al. Index and biological spectrum of human DNase I hypersensitive sites. Nature 584, 244–251 (2020).
pubmed: 32728217
pmcid: 7422677
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2559-3
Dong, P. et al. Population-level variation of enhancer expression identifies novel disease mechanisms in the human brain. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01170-4 (2022).
Ernst, J. & Kellis, M. Large-scale imputation of epigenomic datasets for systematic annotation of diverse human tissues. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 364–376 (2015).
pubmed: 25690853
pmcid: 4512306
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3157
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
pubmed: 25605792
pmcid: 4402510
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007
Hoffman, G. E. & Roussos, P. Dream: powerful differential expression analysis for repeated measures designs. Bioinformatics 37, 192–201 (2021).
pubmed: 32730587
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa687
de Leeuw, C. A., Mooij, J. M., Heskes, T. & Posthuma, D. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004219 (2015).
pubmed: 25885710
pmcid: 4401657
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219
Haroutunian, V., Katsel, P. & Schmeidler, J. Transcriptional vulnerability of brain regions in Alzheimer’s disease and dementia. Neurobiol. Aging 30, 561–573 (2009).
pubmed: 17845826
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.07.021
Morris, J. C. et al. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 39, 1159–1165 (1989).
pubmed: 2771064
doi: 10.1212/WNL.39.9.1159
Buenrostro, J. D., Wu, B., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. ATAC-seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome-wide. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 109, 21.29.1–21.29.9 (2015).
doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb2129s109
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
pubmed: 23104886
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
pubmed: 18798982
pmcid: 2592715
doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137
McKenna, A. et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
pubmed: 20644199
pmcid: 2928508
doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110
Manichaikul, A. et al. Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 26, 2867–2873 (2010).
pubmed: 20926424
pmcid: 3025716
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq559
Servant, N. et al. HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing. Genome Biol. 16, 259 (2015).
pubmed: 26619908
pmcid: 4665391
doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0831-x
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
pubmed: 22388286
pmcid: 3322381
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell Syst. 3, 95–98 (2016).
pubmed: 27467249
pmcid: 5846465
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.002
Shin, H. et al. TopDom: an efficient and deterministic method for identifying topological domains in genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e70 (2016).
pubmed: 26704975
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1505
Yu, G., Wang, L.-G. & He, Q.-Y. ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics 31, 2382–2383 (2015).
pubmed: 25765347
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv145
Lawrence, M. et al. Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003118 (2013).
pubmed: 23950696
pmcid: 3738458
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118
Zhang, Y. et al. An RNA-sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 34, 11929–11947 (2014).
pubmed: 25186741
pmcid: 4152602
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1860-14.2014
Liberzon, A. et al. Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics 27, 1739–1740 (2011).
pubmed: 21546393
pmcid: 3106198
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr260
McLean, C. Y. et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 495–501 (2010).
pubmed: 20436461
pmcid: 4840234
doi: 10.1038/nbt.1630
Law, C.W. et al. RNA-seq analysis is easy as 1-2-3 with limma, Glimma and edgeR. F1000Res 5, 1408 (2016).
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9005.1
Yoshida, H. et al. The cis-regulatory atlas of the mouse immune system. Cell 176, 897–912 (2019).
pubmed: 30686579
pmcid: 6785993
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.036
Anscombe, F. J. The transformation of Poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data. Biometrika 35, 246–254 (1948).
doi: 10.1093/biomet/35.3-4.246
Francis Harrison, P. Varistran: Anscombe’s variance stabilizing transformation for RNA-seq gene expression data. JOSS 2, 257 (2017).
doi: 10.21105/joss.00257
Gandal, M. J. et al. Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Science 362, eaat8127 (2018).
pubmed: 30545856
pmcid: 6443102
doi: 10.1126/science.aat8127
Nagpal, S. et al. TIGAR: an improved Bayesian tool for transcriptomic data imputation enhances gene mapping of complex traits. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 105, 258–266 (2019).
pubmed: 31230719
pmcid: 6698804
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.05.018
Becker, M., Kuhse, J. & Kirsch, J. Effects of two elongation factor 1A isoforms on the formation of gephyrin clusters at inhibitory synapses in hippocampal neurons. Histochem. Cell Biol. 140, 603–609 (2013).
pubmed: 23839781
doi: 10.1007/s00418-013-1122-9
Shirao, T. et al. The role of drebrin in neurons. J. Neurochem. 141, 819–834 (2017).
pubmed: 28199019
doi: 10.1111/jnc.13988
Hetman, M. & Slomnicki, L. P. Ribosomal biogenesis as an emerging target of neurodevelopmental pathologies. J. Neurochem. 148, 325–347 (2019).
pubmed: 30144322
doi: 10.1111/jnc.14576
Schrode, N. et al. Synergistic effects of common schizophrenia risk variants. Nat. Genet. 51, 1475–1485 (2019).
pubmed: 31548722
pmcid: 6778520
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0497-5
Weirauch, M. T. et al. Determination and inference of eukaryotic transcription factor sequence specificity. Cell 158, 1431–1443 (2014).
pubmed: 25215497
pmcid: 4163041
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.009
Gupta, S., Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A., Bailey, T. L. & Noble, W. S. Quantifying similarity between motifs. Genome Biol. 8, R24 (2007).
pubmed: 17324271
pmcid: 1852410
doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r24
Reyna, M. A., Leiserson, M. D. M. & Raphael, B. J. Hierarchical HotNet: identifying hierarchies of altered subnetworks. Bioinformatics 34, i972–i980 (2018).
pubmed: 30423088
pmcid: 6129270
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty613