Systematic review of subsequent pregnancy outcomes in couples with parental abnormal chromosomal karyotypes and recurrent pregnancy loss.
Recurrent pregnancy loss
abnormal karyotype
live birth rate
miscarriage rate
preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Journal
Fertility and sterility
ISSN: 1556-5653
Titre abrégé: Fertil Steril
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372772
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
received:
25
11
2021
revised:
24
07
2022
accepted:
08
08
2022
pubmed:
30
9
2022
medline:
26
10
2022
entrez:
29
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the current evidence of pregnancy outcomes among couples with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) with abnormal karyotypes vs. those with normal karyotypes and among couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes after receiving expectant management vs. preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic medical centers. Pregnancy outcomes in 6,301 couples with RPL who conceived without medical intervention in 11 studies were analyzed. However, only 2 studies addressed the outcomes of couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes after expectant management (75 cases) vs. PGD (50 cases). None. The pregnancy outcomes in couples with RPL with abnormal and normal karyotypes across included studies were evaluated. Compared with those with a normal karyotype, a significantly lower first pregnancy live birth rate (LBR) was found in couples with RPL with abnormal karyotypes (58.5% vs. 71.9%; odds ratio [OR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.65; I Couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes had a higher miscarriage rate than couples with normal karyotypes but achieved a noninferior accumulated LBR through multiple conception attempts. In couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes, PGD treatment did not increase the accumulated LBR but markedly reduced miscarriage rate compared with expectant management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36175209
pii: S0015-0282(22)00530-1
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.008
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
906-914Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.