Dosimetric robustness of lung tumor photon radiotherapy evaluated from multiple event CT imaging.
Advanced lung radiotherapy
Breathing motion evaluation
Robust optimization
Journal
Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)
ISSN: 1724-191X
Titre abrégé: Phys Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 9302888
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
02
04
2022
revised:
02
09
2022
accepted:
13
09
2022
pubmed:
2
10
2022
medline:
30
11
2022
entrez:
1
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intrafractional respiratory motion is a concern for lung tumor radiotherapy but full evaluation of its impact is hampered by the lack of images representing the true motion. This study presents a novel evaluation using free-breathing images acquired over realistic treatment times to study the dosimetric impact of respiratory motion in photon radiotherapy. Cine-CT images of 14 patients with lung cancer acquired during eight minutes of free-breathing at three occasions were used to simulate dose tracking of four different planning methods. These methods aimed to deliver 54 Gy in three fractions to D Despite tumor motion amplitudes being larger than in the 4DCT all but FLU achieved the intended CTV D Tumor motion in free-breathing not covered by the 4DCT had a small impact on dose. The RB4 is recommended for planning of free-breathing treatments. No factor was found that consistently correlated dose degradation with patient or motion attributes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36182764
pii: S1120-1797(22)02049-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.09.007
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-10Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica e Sanitaria. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.