Comparative Adherence and Persistence of Single- and Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapies Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in an English Real-World Primary Care Setting.
Administration, Inhalation
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
/ adverse effects
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists
/ adverse effects
Bronchodilator Agents
/ adverse effects
Humans
Muscarinic Antagonists
/ adverse effects
Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Primary Health Care
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
/ diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
COPD
Clinical Practice Research Datalink
Hospital Episode Statistics
MITT
SITT
proportion of days covered
Journal
International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
ISSN: 1178-2005
Titre abrégé: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101273481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
12
04
2022
accepted:
12
09
2022
entrez:
3
10
2022
pubmed:
4
10
2022
medline:
5
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Triple therapy comprising a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, long-acting β This was a retrospective cohort study using linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum) and secondary care (Hospital Episode Statistics [HES] Admitted Patient Care) data to identify patients with COPD who were newly initiated on SITT or MITT between November 2017 and June 2019. Eligible patients were aged ≥35 years and had a forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity <0.7, linkage to HES and continuous registration with a general practitioner for 12 months pre- and 6 months post-initiation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics between cohorts. Adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered by days' supply of SITT or MITT prescriptions. Persistence was measured with a gap of >30 days between the end of a prescription and the following refill used to determine non-persistence. Overall, 4080 SITT and 6579 MITT users comprised the study cohort. After weighting, the baseline characteristics between the cohorts were comparable (absolute standardized mean difference <10%). SITT users had significantly higher adherence than MITT users at 6, 12, and 18 months post-initiation (p<0.001 for all comparisons). Median persistence was higher among SITT users than MITT users (5.09 months vs 0.99 months). Patients with COPD in England initiating SITT had significantly better adherence and persistence compared with MITT initiators. These improvements continued at least 18 months following treatment initiation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36185170
doi: 10.2147/COPD.S370540
pii: 370540
pmc: PMC9519012
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
0
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists
0
Bronchodilator Agents
0
Muscarinic Antagonists
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2417-2429Informations de copyright
© 2022 Halpin et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Kieran J Rothnie, Alexandrosz Czira, Chris Compton, Kirill Nikitin, Raj Sharma, and Afisi S Ismaila are employees of and/or hold stocks/shares in GSK. Neil Snowise is a previous employee of GSK and holds GSK stocks/shares. Victoria Banks, Robert Wood, Theo Tritton, Olivia Massey, and Rosie Wild are employees of Adelphi Real World. Adelphi Real World received funding from GSK to conduct the study. David MG Halpin reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Aerogen, Chiesi, CSL Behring, and GSK, personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis, and personal fees from Pfizer and Sanofi. Claus F Vogelmeier has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Chiesi, GSK, and Grifols, and has given presentations at symposia and/or served on scientific advisory boards sponsored by Aerogen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Chiesi, GSK, Grifols, Menarini, Novartis, and Nuvaira. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jul;30(7):1427-36
pubmed: 24666181
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Jun 07;7(2):
pubmed: 34109236
J Med Econ. 2011;14(4):486-96
pubmed: 21679019
Clin Kidney J. 2021 Aug 26;15(1):14-20
pubmed: 35035932
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Dec;17(12):1202-17
pubmed: 18972454
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 09;11(3):e0151357
pubmed: 26959820
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Feb;31(2):105-115
pubmed: 33782092
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Feb 19;14:343-352
pubmed: 30863037
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 1;48(6):1740-1740g
pubmed: 30859197
Respir Med. 2013 Oct;107(10):1481-90
pubmed: 23643487
Respir Med. 2022 Jun;197:106807
pubmed: 35429764
Thorax. 2009 Nov;64(11):939-43
pubmed: 19703830
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 23;4(7):e005540
pubmed: 25056980
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Jun;9(9):603-614
pubmed: 32186922
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Jan;3(1):63-78
pubmed: 24266593
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Dec 17;1(3):1035
pubmed: 25848578
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jul - Aug;8(7):2384-2385
pubmed: 32371047
Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov 21;8:771-782
pubmed: 27920578
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2014 Nov 22;9(1):60
pubmed: 25485108
Pragmat Obs Res. 2021 May 24;12:25-35
pubmed: 34079422
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2010 Nov 24;5:401-6
pubmed: 21191434
Respir Med. 2021 Jun;182:106398
pubmed: 33901786