Contextual effects in sensorimotor adaptation adhere to associative learning rules.
associative learning
cerebellum
context
forward model
human
neuroscience
sensorimotor adaptation
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 10 2022
05 10 2022
Historique:
received:
24
11
2021
accepted:
04
10
2022
pubmed:
6
10
2022
medline:
9
11
2022
entrez:
5
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Traditional associative learning tasks focus on the formation of associations between salient events and arbitrary stimuli that predict those events. This is exemplified in cerebellar-dependent delay eyeblink conditioning, where arbitrary cues such as a tone or light act as conditioned stimuli (CSs) that predict aversive sensations at the cornea (unconditioned stimulus [US]). Here, we ask if a similar framework could be applied to another type of cerebellar-dependent sensorimotor learning - sensorimotor adaptation. Models of sensorimotor adaptation posit that the introduction of an environmental perturbation results in an error signal that is used to update an internal model of a sensorimotor map for motor planning. Here, we take a step toward an integrative account of these two forms of cerebellar-dependent learning, examining the relevance of core concepts from associative learning for sensorimotor adaptation. Using a visuomotor adaptation reaching task, we paired movement-related feedback (US) with neutral auditory or visual contextual cues that served as CSs. Trial-by-trial changes in feedforward movement kinematics exhibited three key signatures of associative learning: differential conditioning, sensitivity to the CS-US interval, and compound conditioning. Moreover, after compound conditioning, a robust negative correlation was observed between responses to the two elemental CSs of the compound (i.e. overshadowing), consistent with the additivity principle posited by theories of associative learning. The existence of associative learning effects in sensorimotor adaptation provides a proof-of-concept for linking cerebellar-dependent learning paradigms within a common theoretical framework.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36197002
doi: 10.7554/eLife.75801
pii: 75801
pmc: PMC9635873
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R35 NS116883
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022, Avraham et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
GA, JT, AB, SM No competing interests declared, RI Senior editor, eLife
Références
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 19;9(1):17040
pubmed: 31745122
Science. 1998 Apr 3;280(5360):77-81
pubmed: 9525860
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Nov 1;120(5):2640-2648
pubmed: 30207865
Elife. 2022 Aug 15;11:
pubmed: 35969491
J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 12;32(37):12756-68
pubmed: 22972999
J Neurosci. 2015 Apr 1;35(13):5109-17
pubmed: 25834038
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Apr;2(4):300-311
pubmed: 29736420
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Nov 04;11(11):e1004567
pubmed: 26535896
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Apr;143(4):520-4
pubmed: 11914799
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;107(1):134-47
pubmed: 21975446
J Neurosci. 2019 May 15;39(20):3906-3920
pubmed: 30850511
Curr Biol. 2014 May 19;24(10):1050-61
pubmed: 24794296
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1964 Apr;57:188-95
pubmed: 14168641
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jul;10(7):294-300
pubmed: 16793323
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Dec;19(4):906-17
pubmed: 20537562
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Sep 1;2(9):338-47
pubmed: 21227230
J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 27;36(17):4832-45
pubmed: 27122039
Curr Biol. 2015 Feb 2;25(3):397-401
pubmed: 25578907
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Oct 19;16(10):e1008373
pubmed: 33075047
eNeuro. 2016 Apr 29;3(2):
pubmed: 27280151
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Jul;106(1):163-83
pubmed: 21490278
Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7889):489-493
pubmed: 34819674
J Exp Psychol. 1968 Sep;78(1):171-4
pubmed: 5682958
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 26;119(30):e2204379119
pubmed: 35858450
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 3;10(1):40
pubmed: 30604759
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Jul 1;118(1):383-393
pubmed: 28404830
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 25;8(1):14330
pubmed: 30254381
Anim Learn Behav. 1976 May;4(2):186-92
pubmed: 964444
Curr Biol. 2001 Sep 18;11(18):R729-32
pubmed: 11566114
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Sep;49(11):3053-62
pubmed: 21787794
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;185(3):359-81
pubmed: 18251019
Neuron. 2016 Nov 23;92(4):773-779
pubmed: 27817979
Neuron. 2016 Feb 3;89(3):645-57
pubmed: 26844836
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jul;5(7):920-934
pubmed: 33542527
Science. 1995 Sep 29;269(5232):1880-2
pubmed: 7569931
J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 24;28(52):14165-75
pubmed: 19109499
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Feb 1;127(2):329-340
pubmed: 34936513
J Neurosci. 1995 Nov;15(11):7644-52
pubmed: 7472515
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Oct 1;124(4):1122-1130
pubmed: 32902347
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Jul;20(7):535-544
pubmed: 27261056
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2007 Aug;193(8):801-24
pubmed: 17639413
Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7889):387-388
pubmed: 34789883
J Neurosci. 2000 Dec 1;20(23):8916-24
pubmed: 11102502
J Physiol. 1969 Jun;202(2):437-70
pubmed: 5784296
J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 21;35(42):14386-96
pubmed: 26490874
J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 17;32(42):14617-21
pubmed: 23077047
J Neurosci. 2012 Apr 4;32(14):4913-22
pubmed: 22492047
Cerebellum. 2016 Apr;15(2):93-103
pubmed: 26112422
J Neurosci. 2020 Apr 8;40(15):3075-3088
pubmed: 32029533
J Neurosci. 2021 Mar 24;41(12):2747-2761
pubmed: 33558432
Commun Biol. 2018 Mar 22;1:19
pubmed: 30271906
J Neurosci. 2015 Jul 1;35(26):9568-79
pubmed: 26134640
Neuron. 2011 May 26;70(4):787-801
pubmed: 21609832
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Dec;71:829-848
pubmed: 27693227
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jun;29(6):1061-1074
pubmed: 28195523
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Mar 1;123(3):1180-1192
pubmed: 32101495
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1970 Aug;72(2):193-202
pubmed: 5489453
PLoS Biol. 2006 Jun;4(6):e179
pubmed: 16700627
PLoS Biol. 2021 Mar 5;19(3):e3001147
pubmed: 33667219
Am Psychol. 1988 Mar;43(3):151-60
pubmed: 3364852
Annu Rev Psychol. 2021 Jan 4;72:61-95
pubmed: 32976728
J Neurosci. 2005 Jan 12;25(2):473-8
pubmed: 15647491
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Dec 1;6(12):524-531
pubmed: 12475713
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Nov 1;126(5):1490-1506
pubmed: 34550024
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Mar;115(3):1499-511
pubmed: 26792878
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Apr;111(7):1444-54
pubmed: 24431403
Learn Behav. 2008 Aug;36(3):210-26
pubmed: 18683466
Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Aug;80:138-153
pubmed: 31170534
Science. 2014 Sep 12;345(6202):1349-53
pubmed: 25123484
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 30;93(9):3843-6
pubmed: 8632977
Compr Physiol. 2019 Mar 14;9(2):613-663
pubmed: 30873583
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;100(5):2537-48
pubmed: 18596178
Psychol Bull. 1972 Sep;78(3):189-208
pubmed: 4560788
Psychol Rev. 2013 Jan;120(1):190-229
pubmed: 23356780
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
J Neurosci. 2014 Feb 19;34(8):3023-32
pubmed: 24553942
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Jan 1;125(1):12-22
pubmed: 33236937
Psychol Rev. 2000 Apr;107(2):289-344
pubmed: 10789198
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Nov;3 Suppl:1212-7
pubmed: 11127840
Biol Cybern. 1992;68(2):95-103
pubmed: 1486143
Elife. 2019 Apr 29;8:
pubmed: 31033439
J Neurophysiol. 2013 May;109(10):2632-44
pubmed: 23446696
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Feb;7(2):111-2
pubmed: 14745452
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun 1;113(10):3836-49
pubmed: 25855690
Neuroreport. 2001 Jul 3;12(9):1879-84
pubmed: 11435916
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Feb;89(2):1165-75
pubmed: 12574490
Nat Neurosci. 2018 May;21(5):736-743
pubmed: 29662213
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Jan 1;123(1):57-69
pubmed: 31721646
J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 21;32(12):4230-9
pubmed: 22442085
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1969 Oct;69(2):226-31
pubmed: 5404450