What should be included in case report forms? Development and application of novel methods to inform surgical study design: a mixed methods case study in parastomal hernia prevention.
colorectal surgery
epidemiology
qualitative research
surgery
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 10 2022
05 10 2022
Historique:
entrez:
5
10
2022
pubmed:
6
10
2022
medline:
12
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To describe the development and application of methods to optimise the design of case report forms (CRFs) for clinical studies evaluating surgical procedures, illustrated with an example of abdominal stoma formation. (1) Literature reviews, to identify reported variations in surgical components of stoma formation, were supplemented by (2) intraoperative qualitative research (observations, videos and interviews), to identify unreported variations used in practice to generate (3) a 'long list' of items, which were rationalised using (4) consensus methods, providing a pragmatic list of CRF items to be captured in the Cohort study to Investigate the Prevention of parastomal HERnias (CIPHER) study. Two secondary care surgical centres in England. Patients undergoing stoma formation, surgeons undertaking stoma formation and stoma nurses. Successful identification of key CRF items to be captured in the CIPHER study. 59 data items relating to stoma formation were identified and categorised within six themes: (1) surgical approach to stoma formation; (2) trephine formation; (3) reinforcing the stoma trephine with mesh; (4) use of the stoma as a specimen extraction site; (5) closure of other wounds during the procedure; and (6) spouting the stoma. This study used multimodal data collection to understand and capture the technical variations in stoma formation and design bespoke CRFs for a multicentre cohort study. The CIPHER study will use the CRFs to examine associations between the technical variations in stoma formation and risks of developing a parastomal hernia. ISRCTN17573805.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36198447
pii: bmjopen-2022-061300
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061300
pmc: PMC9535162
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e061300Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K025643/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S001751/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Hernia. 2016 Aug;20(4):535-41
pubmed: 26511879
Trials. 2015 Dec 28;16:589
pubmed: 26710760
Br J Surg. 2016 Sep;103(10):1377-84
pubmed: 27462835
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Aug;14(8):931-6
pubmed: 21929523
Dig Surg. 2014;31(4-5):366-76
pubmed: 25531238
Hernia. 2019 Aug;23(4):825-828
pubmed: 30840175
Ann Surg. 2016 Dec;264(6):923-928
pubmed: 27828820
Colorectal Dis. 2013 May;15(5):e202-14
pubmed: 23374759
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;18(2):O81-90
pubmed: 26713666
Ann Surg. 2019 Mar;269(3):427-431
pubmed: 29064900
Fam Pract. 1996 Dec;13(6):522-5
pubmed: 9023528
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 22;(11):CD009487
pubmed: 24265176
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):183-198
pubmed: 29134456
Lancet. 2013 Jan 5;381(9860):27-8
pubmed: 23290962
Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Jul;48(7):812-6
pubmed: 27130912
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907
pubmed: 29937585
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5372-5379
pubmed: 27059972