Ex vivo γH2AX assay for tumor radiosensitivity in primary prostate cancer patients and correlation with clinical parameters.
Intrinsic radio sensitivity
Prostate cancer
Radiotherapy
Standardized uptake values
γH2AX foci
Journal
Radiation oncology (London, England)
ISSN: 1748-717X
Titre abrégé: Radiat Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265111
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Oct 2022
05 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
22
08
2022
accepted:
13
09
2022
entrez:
5
10
2022
pubmed:
6
10
2022
medline:
12
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Accurate surrogate parameters for radio resistance are warranted for individualized radiotherapy (RT) concepts in prostate cancer (PCa). The purpose of this study was to assess intertumoral heterogeneity in terms of radio resistance using an ex-vivo γH2AX assay after irradiation of prostate biopsy cores and to investigate its correlation with clinical features of respective patients as well as imaging and genomic features of tumor areas. Twenty one patients with histologically-proven PCa and pre-therapeutic multiparametric resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography were included in the study. Biopsy cores were collected from 26 PCa foci. Residual γH2AX foci were counted 24 h after ex-vivo irradiation (with 0 and 4 Gy) of biopsy specimen and served as a surrogate for radio resistance. Clinical, genomic (next generation sequencing) and imaging features were collected and their association with the radio resistance was studied. In total 18 PCa lesions from 16 patients were included in the final analysis. The median γH2AX foci value per PCa lesion was 3.12. According to this, the patients were divided into two groups (radio sensitive vs. radio resistant) with significant differences in foci number (p < 0.0001). The patients in the radio sensitive group had significantly higher prostate specific antigen serum concentration (p = 0.015), tumor areas in the radio sensitive group had higher SUV (standardized uptake values in PSMA PET)-max and -mean values (p = 0.0037, p = 0.028) and lower ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient-mean values, p = 0.049). All later parameters had significant (p < 0.05) correlations in Pearson's test. One patient in the radio sensitive group displayed a previously not reported loss of function frameshift mutation in the NBN gene (c.654_658delAAAAC) that introduces a premature termination codon and results in a truncated protein. In this pilot study, significant differences in intertumoral radio resistance were observed and clinical as well as imaging parameters may be applied for their prediction. After further prospective validation in larger patient cohorts these finding may lead to individual RT dose prescription for PCa patients in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36199143
doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02131-1
pii: 10.1186/s13014-022-02131-1
pmc: PMC9533509
doi:
Substances chimiques
Codon, Nonsense
0
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
163Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : SCHE 2092/3-1, SCHE 2092/4-1 [RP9, CP2, CP3] and CRU329, Project-ID 43198400-SFB1453
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2013 May 10;31(14):1748-57
pubmed: 23569316
Nat Rev Cancer. 2008 Dec;8(12):957-67
pubmed: 19005492
Mol Cancer Ther. 2020 Jun;19(6):1373-1382
pubmed: 32220973
J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1415-9
pubmed: 16952647
Cancer Biol Ther. 2019;20(2):219-226
pubmed: 30339521
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Jul;100(1):137-44
pubmed: 21821302
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2384894
pubmed: 27990424
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jul-Aug;62(4):220-41
pubmed: 22700443
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):787-796
pubmed: 33471548
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Sep;116(3):473-9
pubmed: 25866027
Curr Oncol Rep. 2019 Mar 27;21(5):42
pubmed: 30919167
J Nucl Med. 2018 Jul;59(7):1007-1013
pubmed: 29674422
Nat Rev Urol. 2019 Nov;16(11):645-654
pubmed: 31591549
Theranostics. 2021 Jul 6;11(16):8027-8042
pubmed: 34335978
Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:181-211
pubmed: 20192759
Front Oncol. 2020 Dec 07;10:600690
pubmed: 33365271
Cancer Res. 2004 Feb 15;64(4):1215-9
pubmed: 14973119
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Sep;124(3):386-394
pubmed: 28919005
Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Jan;72(1):1-12
pubmed: 12474142
Aging Cell. 2009 Aug;8(4):414-25
pubmed: 19473118
Crit Rev Oncog. 2018;23(1-2):39-67
pubmed: 29953367
Lancet. 2022 Jan 29;399(10323):447-460
pubmed: 34953525
J Exp Med. 2018 Jan 2;215(1):159-175
pubmed: 29141866
Cancer Res. 2008 Sep 1;68(17):7110-9
pubmed: 18757426
JAMA. 1998 Sep 16;280(11):969-74
pubmed: 9749478
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33
pubmed: 33433946
Cancer Lett. 2021 Aug 28;514:1-11
pubmed: 34022282
Tumour Biol. 2013 Oct;34(5):2753-7
pubmed: 23765759
Br J Cancer. 2013 Feb 5;108(2):461-8
pubmed: 23149842
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2016 Jun;8(3):241-8
pubmed: 27504134
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Dec;141:214-219
pubmed: 31431366
Br J Cancer. 2012 May 8;106(10):1697-701
pubmed: 22516946
Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Jul;26(14):5310-24
pubmed: 16809768
Oncotarget. 2014 Nov 30;5(22):11081-90
pubmed: 25415046
J Nucl Med. 2022 May 5;:
pubmed: 35512996
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):443-53
pubmed: 27433846