Clinical Prediction Model for Antibody-Mediated Rejection: A Strategy to Minimize Surveillance Endomyocardial Biopsies After Heart Transplantation.
biopsy
heart failure
heart transplantation
phenotype
risk
Journal
Circulation. Heart failure
ISSN: 1941-3297
Titre abrégé: Circ Heart Fail
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101479941
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
7
10
2022
medline:
21
10
2022
entrez:
6
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In heart transplantation, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major contributor to patient morbidity and mortality. Multiple routine endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) remain the gold standard to detect AMR, but this invasive procedure suffers from many limitations. We aimed to develop and validate an AMR risk model to improve individual risk stratification of AMR. Heart recipients from 2 referral transplant centers, Cedars-Sinai (US) and Pitié-Salpêtrière (France), were included from 2012 to 2019. Database included detailed clinical, immunologic, imaging, and histological parameters. The US cohort was randomly distributed in a derivation (2/3) and in a test set (1/3). The primary end point was biopsy-proven AMR. A mixed effect logistic regression model with a random intercept was applied to identify variables independently associated with AMR. Simulation analyzes were performed. The US and French cohorts comprised a total of 1341 patients, representing 12 864 EMB. Overall, 490 AMR episodes were diagnosed (3.8% of EMB). Among the 26 potential determinants of AMR, 5 variables showed independent association: time post-transplant ( Our results support the use of the AMR risk model as a clinical decision tool to minimize the number of routine EMB after heart transplantation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In heart transplantation, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major contributor to patient morbidity and mortality. Multiple routine endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) remain the gold standard to detect AMR, but this invasive procedure suffers from many limitations. We aimed to develop and validate an AMR risk model to improve individual risk stratification of AMR.
METHODS
Heart recipients from 2 referral transplant centers, Cedars-Sinai (US) and Pitié-Salpêtrière (France), were included from 2012 to 2019. Database included detailed clinical, immunologic, imaging, and histological parameters. The US cohort was randomly distributed in a derivation (2/3) and in a test set (1/3). The primary end point was biopsy-proven AMR. A mixed effect logistic regression model with a random intercept was applied to identify variables independently associated with AMR. Simulation analyzes were performed.
RESULTS
The US and French cohorts comprised a total of 1341 patients, representing 12 864 EMB. Overall, 490 AMR episodes were diagnosed (3.8% of EMB). Among the 26 potential determinants of AMR, 5 variables showed independent association: time post-transplant (
CONCLUSIONS
Our results support the use of the AMR risk model as a clinical decision tool to minimize the number of routine EMB after heart transplantation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36200456
doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.009923
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM