Stimulus- and Person-Level Variables Influence Word Production and Response to Anomia Treatment for Individuals With Chronic Poststroke Aphasia.
Journal
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
ISSN: 1558-9102
Titre abrégé: J Speech Lang Hear Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9705610
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 10 2022
17 10 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
7
10
2022
medline:
20
10
2022
entrez:
6
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The impact of stimulus-level psycholinguistic variables and person-level semantic and phonological processing skills on treatment outcomes in individuals with aphasia requires further examination to inform clinical decision making in treatment prescription and stimuli selection. This study investigated the influence of stimulus-level psycholinguistic properties and person-level semantic and phonological processing skills on word production accuracy and treatment response. This retrospective analysis included 35 individuals with chronic, poststroke aphasia, 30 of whom completed typicality-based semantic feature treatment. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to predict binary naming accuracy (a) at baseline and (b) over the course of treatment using stimulus-level psycholinguistic word properties and person-level semantic and phonological processing skills as predictors. In baseline naming, words with less complex lexical-semantic and phonological properties showed greater predicted accuracy. There was also an interaction at baseline between stimulus-level lexical-semantic properties and person-level semantic processing skills in predicting baseline naming accuracy. With treatment, words that were more complex from a lexical-semantic standpoint (vs. less complex) and less complex from a phonological standpoint (vs. more complex) improved more. Individuals with greater baseline semantic and phonological processing skills showed a greater treatment response. This study suggests that future clinical research and clinical work should consider semantic and phonological properties of words in selecting stimuli for semantically based treatment. Furthermore, future clinical research should continue to evaluate baseline individual semantic and phonological profiles as predictors of response to semantically based treatment. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21256341.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36201169
doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00527
pmc: PMC9927625
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3854-3872Subventions
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : P50 DC012283
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : T32 DC013017
Pays : United States
Références
Neuropsychologia. 1995 Oct;33(10):1281-303
pubmed: 8552229
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Mar;11(1):32-43
pubmed: 21264640
J Complex Netw. 2019 Dec;7(6):913-931
pubmed: 31984136
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020 Jun;30(5):802-828
pubmed: 30027828
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):
pubmed: 24403724
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):481-7
pubmed: 15641436
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010 Jul;27(5):401-27
pubmed: 21718214
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Apr 13;374(2065):20150202
pubmed: 26953178
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Aug;46(4):773-87
pubmed: 12959459
Cortex. 2021 Aug;141:363-402
pubmed: 34130047
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Mar 11;28(1S):230-246
pubmed: 30208415
Cognition. 2001 Feb;78(2):189-205
pubmed: 11074250
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 Jan;54(1):123-142
pubmed: 30474174
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun 01;58(3):865-877
pubmed: 25813461
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Feb;22(1):1-38; discussion 38-75
pubmed: 11301520
Brain Lang. 2003 Jun;85(3):441-50
pubmed: 12744956
Aphasiology. 2009 Jul 1;23(7):835-853
pubmed: 19816590
Behav Res Methods. 2010 May;42(2):393-413
pubmed: 20479171
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Sep;76:220-39
pubmed: 25934635
Aphasiology. 2013 Jul;27(7):784-798
pubmed: 24610969
Brain. 2012 Dec;135(Pt 12):3799-814
pubmed: 23171662
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Feb 11;30(1S):344-358
pubmed: 32571091
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 Feb;16(1):18-29
pubmed: 17329672
Mem Cognit. 2020 Aug;48(6):1061-1072
pubmed: 32372366
Brain. 2009 Dec;132(Pt 12):3411-27
pubmed: 19942676
Aphasiology. 2016;30(6):719-749
pubmed: 27041784
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 01;(6):CD000425
pubmed: 27245310
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2017 Oct - Dec;34(7-8):449-471
pubmed: 28914137
Brain Lang. 2002 Aug;82(2):113-45
pubmed: 12096871
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Feb;68:33-58
pubmed: 24291531
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):514-29
pubmed: 14979821
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Sep;25(9):1504-16
pubmed: 23647518
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008 Jun;25(4):463-92
pubmed: 18704797
Cognition. 2013 Sep;128(3):287-301
pubmed: 23742841
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jul;100(7):1251-1258
pubmed: 30639272
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005 Oct;22(7):817-50
pubmed: 21038278
Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;31(1):157-68
pubmed: 21635291
Cortex. 2020 Mar;124:260-273
pubmed: 31958653
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 Nov;17(4):389-400
pubmed: 18845698
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):445-59
pubmed: 17958156
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(3):127-46
pubmed: 24003904
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Dec;72(12):2752-2775
pubmed: 31184282
Cogn Sci. 2020 Sep;44(9):e12881
pubmed: 32893389
J Mem Lang. 2010 Nov 1;63(4):541-559
pubmed: 21076661
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2020;35(8):980-991
pubmed: 33043066
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Dec;49(6):1175-92
pubmed: 17197489
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):978-90
pubmed: 22581493
Brain Commun. 2021 Aug 05;3(3):fcab174
pubmed: 34423302
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004 Feb 1;21(1):57-78
pubmed: 21038191
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):411-22
pubmed: 21239365
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Dec 1;29(4):1311-1316
pubmed: 25317425
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Nov 08;26(4):1092-1104
pubmed: 28832881
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Dec;51(6):1550-68
pubmed: 18695023