Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular function using an automated analysis algorithm is feasible for beginners and experts: comparison with invasive and non-invasive methods.
Echocardiography
Heart failure
Imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging
Journal
Journal of echocardiography
ISSN: 1880-344X
Titre abrégé: J Echocardiogr
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101263153
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2023
06 2023
Historique:
received:
02
05
2022
accepted:
13
09
2022
revised:
01
09
2022
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
14
10
2022
entrez:
13
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular function using a user-friendly automated three-dimensional algorithm is highly attractive as it promises quick and accurate diagnosis, circumventing limitations associated with visual estimation or manual biplane measurements. We sought to assess the feasibility and correlation of such automated analysis with clinically established methods. A total of 198 patients undergoing transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with assessment of left ventricular parameters by automated software algorithm (Philips 3D-Heartmodel; 3D-HM) which additionally had either left ventricular angiography (LVA) or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within 24 h of the TTE examination were analyzed. Left ventricular parameters (left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LVEDV, left ventricular end-systolic volume, LVESV as well as left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF) were compared between 3D-HM, CMR and LVA. Correlation of left ventricular measurements was overall good to excellent and stronger for CMR (EF r = 0.824) than for LVA (EF r = 0.746). Unexperienced and expert clinicians yielded comparable good results. For CMR, highest correlation was detected in patients with BMI < 25 and excellent image quality. High agreement was seen between 3D-HM and CMR or LVA when stratifying patients according to heart failure categories. Echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular parameters using a software-based algorithm correlated well with established invasive and non-invasive modalities in the clinical setting, even for unexperienced clinicians. Such automated approaches are promising as they allow a reliable, more observer-independent as well as reproducible assessment of left ventricular function.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36227498
doi: 10.1007/s12574-022-00590-9
pii: 10.1007/s12574-022-00590-9
pmc: PMC10195710
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
65-73Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 May 1;20(5):541-549
pubmed: 30304500
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul;9(7):769-782
pubmed: 27318718
Circulation. 2005 Jun 28;111(25):3411-9
pubmed: 15967846
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;16(3):233-70
pubmed: 25712077
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 Sep;29(9):853-860.e2
pubmed: 27302414
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Feb;25(2):424-30
pubmed: 7829797
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Nov;110(11):580-589
pubmed: 28566200
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726
pubmed: 34447992
Eur Radiol. 2004 Oct;14(10):1813-22
pubmed: 15258823
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):47-58
pubmed: 28159984
Eur Heart J. 2000 Aug;21(16):1387-96
pubmed: 10952828
Circulation. 2006 Aug 15;114(7):654-61
pubmed: 16894035
Am Heart J. 1982 Jul;104(1):136-44
pubmed: 7090969
Heart. 2006 Jan;92(1):131-6
pubmed: 16365369
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 May 15;59(20):1799-808
pubmed: 22575319
Echocardiography. 2017 Feb;34(2):199-209
pubmed: 28240430
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Nov;30(11):1049-1058
pubmed: 28916243
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Sep;30(9):879-885
pubmed: 28688857
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2018 Jan 23;16(1):2
pubmed: 29357888
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Jul;1(4):413-23
pubmed: 19356461