Vascularized composite allotransplantation: emerging psychosocial issues in hand, face, and uterine transplant.
Journal
Current opinion in organ transplantation
ISSN: 1531-7013
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Organ Transplant
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9717388
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2022
01 12 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
14
10
2022
medline:
29
10
2022
entrez:
13
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Currently, several research approaches warrant further attention, given the influence of psychosocial and bioethical issues on the success of upper extremity (UETx), face (FTx), and uterine transplantation (UTx). This review will highlight recent results of psychosocial and bioethical research in the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA), discuss most recent findings, provide information to guide future research approaches, and address the importance of a multicenter research approach to develop international standards. Previously published reports have tried to identify psychosocial factors that are essential to predict psychosocial outcomes and guide posttransplant treatment after VCA procedures. These issues in VCA are receiving more attention but we are still at the beginning of a systematic investigation of these domains. This review article summarizes the emerging psychosocial issues in UeTx, FTx, and UTx by including recent literature and current clinical practice. Even though different VCA procedures address different domains leading to specific psychosocial issues, common aspects impacting all forms of VCA would benefit of further coordination. These domains include clinical resources, public attitude and perception, bioethical considerations, adherence and rehabilitation, motives for VCA, information needs and multidisciplinary communication, body image, domains of quality of life, coping strategies, and follow-up care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36227757
doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000001028
pii: 00075200-202212000-00003
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
501-507Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Kumnig M, Jowsey-Gregoire S, Bellew M, et al. The Chauvet Workgroup: a resource for the psychosocial aspects of reconstructive transplantation. Mayo Clin Proc 2022; 97:1050–1053.
Rose J, Cooney CM, Kaufman C, et al. Evolving ethics, policy and reimbursement issues of vascularized composite allotransplantation: symposium summary. SAGE Open Medicine 2019; 7:2050312119866944.
Testa G, McKenna GJ, Bayer J, et al. The evolution of transplantation from saving lives to fertility treatment: DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study). Ann Surg 2020; 272:411–417.
Brucker SY, Brännström M, Taran F-A, et al. Selecting living donors for uterus transplantation: lessons learned from two transplantations resulting in menstrual functionality and another attempt, aborted after organ retrieval. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018; 297:675–684.
Järvholm S, Warren AM, Jalmbrant M, et al. Preoperative psychological evaluation of uterus transplant recipients, partners, and living donors: suggested framework. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:2641–2646.
Richards EG, Farrell RM, Ricci S, et al. Uterus transplantation: state of the art in 2021. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:2251–2259.
Denadai R, Araujo KC, Pinho AS, et al. Public's knowledge and attitudes toward vascularized composite allotransplantation and donation. Aesth Plast Surg 2016; 40:301–308.
Nassimizadeh M, Nassimizadeh AK, Power D. Hand transplant surgery. Ann Royal Coll Surg Engl 2014; 96:571–574.
Kaur M, Thoma A. Public attitudes toward vascularized composite allograft donation: a literature review. Transpl Res Risk Manage 2019; 11:39–46.
DiMartini A, Dew MA. In experimental hand transplantation, whose views about outcomes should matter most? AMA J Ethics 2019; 21:E936–E943.
Mills EM, Alfonso AR, Wolfe EM, et al. Public perceptions of cross-sex vascularized composite allotransplantation. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 85:685–690.
Saso S, Clarke A, Bracewell-Milnes T, et al. Psychological issues associated with absolute uterine factor infertility and attitudes of patients toward uterine transplantation. Prog Transplant 2016; 26:28–39.
Richards EG, Agatisa PK, Davis AC, et al. Framing the diagnosis and treatment of absolute uterine factor infertility: insights from in-depth interviews with uterus transplant trial participants. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2019; 10:23–35.
Pittman J, Mogensen L, Brännström M, et al. Uterus transplantation: perspectives of Australian women with absolute uterine factor infertility regarding desirability and utililty. Aust New Zealand J Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 60:264–270.
Tobin GR, Breidenbach WC, Klapheke MM, et al. Ethical considerations in the early composite tissue allograft experience: a review of the Louisville Ethics Program. Transplant Proc 2005; 37:1392–1395.
Baylis F. A face is not just like a hand: pace Barker. Am J Bioeth 2004; 4:30–32.
Järvholm S, Enskog A, Hammarling C, et al. Uterus transplantation: joys and frustrations of becoming a ‘complete’ woman—a qualitative study regarding self-image in the 5-year period after transplantation. Hum Reprod 2020; 35:1855–1863.
Wall AE, Johannesson L, Sok M, et al. The journey from infertility to uterus transplantation: a qualitative study of the perspectives of participants in the Dallas Uterus Transplant Study. BJOG 2022; 129:1095–1102.
Siegler M. Ethical issues in innovative surgery: should we attempt a cadaveric hand transplantation in a human subject? Transplant Proc 1998; 30:2779–2782.
Moore FD. Three ethical revolutions ancient assumptions remodeled under pressure of transplantation. Transplant Proc 1988; 20:1061–1067.
Warren A, Testa G, Anthony T, et al. Live nondirected uterus donors: psychological characteristics and motivation for donation. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:1122–1128.
Järvholm S, Kvarnström N, Dahm-Kähler P, Brännström M. Donors’ health-related quality-of-life and psychosocial outcomes 3 years after uterus donation for transplantation. Hum Reprod 2019; 34:1270–1277.
Kumnig M, Jowsey SG, DiMartini A. Psychological aspects of hand transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2014; 19:188–195.
Kumnig M, Schneeberger S, Hautz T, et al. The psychosocial assessment of candidates for reconstructive hand transplantation: general psychological considerations and presentation of the Innsbruck psychological screening program for reconstructive hand transplantation (iRT-PSP). J Psychosom Res 2011; 70:602–603.
Lucio MJ, Horta R. Hand transplantation - risks and benefits. J Hand Microsurg 2021; 13:207–215.
Hautz T, Messner F, Weissenbacher A, et al. Long-term outcome after hand and forearm transplantation: a retrospective study. Transplant Int 2020; 33:1762–1778.
Hautz T, Engelhardt TO, Weissenbacher A, et al. World experience after more than a decade of clinical hand transplantation: update on the Innsbruck program. Hand Clin 2011; 27:423–431.
Vicari-Christensen M, Repper S, Basile S. Tacrolimus: review of pharmakokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics to facilitate pactitioners’ understanding and offer strategies for education patients and promoting adherence. Progr Transplant 2009; 19:277–284.
Gordon EJ, Ison MG. Decision aids for organ transplant candidates. Liver Transpl 2014; 20:753–755.
Kumnig M, Jowsey SG, Moreno E, et al. An overview of psychosocial assessment procedures in reconstructive hand transplantation. Transpl Int 2013; 27:417–427.
Kinsley SE, Williams EE, Lenhard NK, et al. A provider perspective of psychosocial predictors of upper-extremity vascularized composite allotransplantation success. J Hand Surg Am 2022; 47:e1.e19–e387.e19.
Kumnig M, Jowsey-Gregoire S. Key psychosocial challenges in vascularized composite allotransplantation. World J Transplant 2016; 6:91–102.
Järvholm S, Johannesson L, Brännström M. Psychological aspects in pre transplantation assessments of patients prior to entering the first uterus transplantation trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015; 94:1035–1038.
Järvholm S, Bokström H, Enskog A, et al. Striving for motherhood after uterus transplantation: a qualitative study concerning pregnancy attempts, and the first years of parenthood after transplantation. Hum Reprod 2022; 37:274–283.
Sarwer DB, Siminoff LA, Gardiner HM, Spitzer JC. The psychosocial burden of visible disfigurement following traumatic injury. Front Psychol 2022; 13:979574.
Gacki-Smith J, Kuramitsu BR, Downey M, et al. Information needs and development of a question prompt sheet for upper extremity vascularized composite allotransplantation: a mixed methods study. Front Psychol 2022; 13:960373.
Epstein RM, Street RL. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med 2011; 9:100–103.
Brandes K, LInn AJ, Butow PN, Weert JC. The characteristics and effectiveness of question prompt list interventions in oncology: a systematic review of the literature. Psychooncology 2015; 24:2453252.
Sansoni JE, Grootemaat P, Duncan C. Question prompt lists in health consultations: a review. Patient Educ Couns 2015; 98:1454–1464.
Satteson ES, Roe AK, Eppler SL, et al. Development and testing of a question prompt list fo rcommin hand conditions: an exploratory sequential mixed-methods study. J Hand Surg 2020; 45:1087.
Kinsley SE, Song S, Petruzzo P, et al. Psychosocial predictors of upper extremity transplantation outcomes: a review of the International Registry 1998-2016. PRS Global Open 2020; 8:e3133.
Brännström M, Dahm-Kähler P, Kvarnström N, et al. Reproductive, obstetric, and long-term health outcome after uterus transplantation: results of the first clinical trial. Fertil Steril 2022; 118:576–585.
Järvholm S, Dahm-Kähler P, Kvarnström N, Brännström MJF. Sterility psychosocial outcomes of uterine transplant recipients and partners up to 3 years after transplantation: results from the Swedish trial 2020; 114:407–415.
Sarwer DB, Spitzer JC. Body image dysmorphic disorder in persons who undergo aesthetic medical treatments. Aesth Surg J 2012; 32:999–1009.
Sarwer DB, Polonsky HMB. Body image and body contouring procedures. Aesth Surg J 2016; 36:1039–1047.
Hautz T, Brandacher G, Engelhardt TO, et al. How reconstructive transplantation is different from organ transplantation - and how it is not. Transplant Proc 2011; 43:3504–3511.
Pomahac B, Pribaz J, Eriksson E. Three patients with full facial transplantation. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:715–722.
Siemionow M, Papay F, Alam D. Near-total human face transplantation for a severely disfigured patient in the USA. Lancet 2009; 374:203–209.
Khalifian S, Brazio PS, Mohan R, et al. Facial transplantation: the first 9 years. Lancet 2014; 384:2153–2163.
Siemionow M. The decade of face transplant outcomes. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2017; 28:64.
Brännström M, Belfort MA, Ayoubi JM. Uterus transplantation worldwide: clinical activities and outcomes. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2021; 26:616–626.
Heller-Boersma JG, Schmidt UH, Edmonds DK. Psychological distress in women with uterovaginal agenesis (Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, MRKH). Psychosomatics 2009; 50:277–281.
Weijenborg P, Kluivers K, Dessens A, et al. Sexual functioning, sexual esteem, genital self-image and psychological and relational functioning in women with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome: a case–control study. Hum Reprod 2019; 34:1661–1673.
Johannesson L, Järvholm S. Uterus transplantation: current progress and future prospects. Int J Womens Health 2016; 8:43–51.
Nizzi M-C, Tasigiorgos S, Turk M, et al. Psychological outcomes in face transplant recipients: a literature review. Curr Surg Rep 2017; 5:26.
Folkman S, Lazraurs RS. If it changes it must be a process: study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. J Person Soc Psychol 1985; 48:150–170.
Billings AG, Moos RH. The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events. J Behav Med 1981; 4:139–157.
Endler NS, Parker JD. Multidimensional assessment of coping: a critical evaluation. J Person Soc Psychol 1990; 58:844–854.
Nizzi M-C, Pomahac B. In the face of change: which coping strategies predict better psychosocial outcomes in face transplant recipients? Front Psychol 2022; [in press].
Tyner CE, Slotkin J, Kisala PA, et al. Assessment of quality of life after upper extremity transplantation: framework for patient-reported outcome scale domains. Front Psychol 2022; [in press].
Kubiak CA, Etra JW, Brandacher G, et al. Prosthetic rehabilitation and vascularized composite allotransplantation following upper limb loss. Plast Reconstruct Surg 2019; 143:1688–1701.
Kisala PA, Tulsky DS, Kalppakjian CZ, et al. Measuring anxiety after spinal cord injury: development and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL Anxiety item bank and linkage with GDA. J Spinal Cord Med 2015; 35:315–325.
Kisala PA, Victorson D, Pace N, et al. Measuring psychological trauma after spinal cord injury: development and psychometric charcteristics of the SCI-QOL Psychological Trauma item band and short form. J Behav Med 2015; 38:326–334.
Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Kalppakjian CZ, et al. Measuring depression after spinal cord injury: development and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL Depression item band and linkage with PHQ-9. J Spinal Cord Med 2015; 38:335–346.
Cella D, Lai JS, Nowinski CJ, et al. Neuro-QOL: brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology. Neurology 2012; 78:1860–1867.
Gerhson RC, Lai JS, Bode R, et al. Neuro-QOL: quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: item development and calibration base upon clinical and general population testing. Quality of Life Research 2012; 21:475–486.