Catch-up immunisation for migrant children in Melbourne: A qualitative study with providers to determine key challenges.

Catch-Up Vaccination Child Health Health Personnel Immunization Programs Immunization Schedule Transients and Migrants Vaccine hesitancy

Journal

Vaccine
ISSN: 1873-2518
Titre abrégé: Vaccine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406899

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 11 2022
Historique:
received: 23 02 2022
revised: 01 08 2022
accepted: 26 08 2022
pubmed: 16 10 2022
medline: 8 11 2022
entrez: 15 10 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Current models of immunisation service delivery in Australia are not meeting the needs of migrant children, who experience a higher burden of vaccine preventable disease and lower immunisation rates compared to non-migrant children. Understanding the experiences of immunisation providers is critical for designing effective and tailored interventions to improve this service. This study aimed to identify the facilitators and barriers to providers delivering a comprehensive catch-up immunisation service to migrant children in Melbourne, Australia. Semi-structured interviews with council and general practice immunisation providers were conducted. Recorded interviews were transcribed and coded inductively using thematic analysis. Identified themes were then deductively categorised according to the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation of Behaviour (COM-B) model. Twenty-four providers (five practice nurses, six general practitioners, six council nurses and seven council administration officers) were interviewed between March and June 2021. Fourteen themes were identified that contributed to the delivery of an effective catch-up immunisation service. Capability themes included training, experience and skills to perform the service and communicate with families. Opportunity themes incorporated time, workplace norms, traits of migrant families, costs, systems and resources. Themes related to motivation were provider responsibility, beliefs about migrant health, and immunisation prioritisation. Key barriers for providers to deliver a comprehensive catch-up immunisation service were related to opportunity. Developing an online tool to support catch-up schedule development and reporting, and funding provider time to calculate the schedule are primary actions that could overcome opportunity barriers. Capability and motivation barriers for general practitioners included limited time, skills, and motivation compared to nurses. These barriers may be overcome with improvements to training that focus on upskilling nurses to deliver the catch-up service. Service delivery challenges are multifactorial, requiring a range of strategies to optimise this service and increase immunisation coverage in migrant children.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Current models of immunisation service delivery in Australia are not meeting the needs of migrant children, who experience a higher burden of vaccine preventable disease and lower immunisation rates compared to non-migrant children. Understanding the experiences of immunisation providers is critical for designing effective and tailored interventions to improve this service. This study aimed to identify the facilitators and barriers to providers delivering a comprehensive catch-up immunisation service to migrant children in Melbourne, Australia.
METHODS
Semi-structured interviews with council and general practice immunisation providers were conducted. Recorded interviews were transcribed and coded inductively using thematic analysis. Identified themes were then deductively categorised according to the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation of Behaviour (COM-B) model.
RESULTS
Twenty-four providers (five practice nurses, six general practitioners, six council nurses and seven council administration officers) were interviewed between March and June 2021. Fourteen themes were identified that contributed to the delivery of an effective catch-up immunisation service. Capability themes included training, experience and skills to perform the service and communicate with families. Opportunity themes incorporated time, workplace norms, traits of migrant families, costs, systems and resources. Themes related to motivation were provider responsibility, beliefs about migrant health, and immunisation prioritisation.
CONCLUSIONS
Key barriers for providers to deliver a comprehensive catch-up immunisation service were related to opportunity. Developing an online tool to support catch-up schedule development and reporting, and funding provider time to calculate the schedule are primary actions that could overcome opportunity barriers. Capability and motivation barriers for general practitioners included limited time, skills, and motivation compared to nurses. These barriers may be overcome with improvements to training that focus on upskilling nurses to deliver the catch-up service. Service delivery challenges are multifactorial, requiring a range of strategies to optimise this service and increase immunisation coverage in migrant children.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36243589
pii: S0264-410X(22)01063-5
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.063
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6776-6784

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [PH works in the City of Melbourne Immunisation Service. There are no other interests to declare.].

Auteurs

Isabella Overmars (I)

School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: belle.overmars@mcri.edu.au.

Jessica Kaufman (J)

Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Philippa Holland (P)

Immunisation Service, City of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Margie Danchin (M)

Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Jane Tuckerman (J)

Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH