Genetic and phenotypic correlations between Aleutian disease tests with body weight, growth, and feed efficiency traits in mink.

Aleutian disease disease resilience feed efficiency genetic correlations growth mink

Journal

Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 04 08 2022
accepted: 15 10 2022
pubmed: 18 10 2022
medline: 15 12 2022
entrez: 17 10 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The ineffectiveness of vaccination, medicine, and culling strategy leads mink farmers to control Aleutian disease (AD) by selecting AD-resilient mink based on AD tests. However, the genetic background of AD tests and their correlations with economically important or AD-resilient traits are limited. This study estimated the genetic and phenotypic correlations between four AD tests and seven body weight (BW) traits, six growth parameters from the Richards growth model, and eight feed-related traits. Univariate models were used to test the significance (P < 0.05) of fixed effects (sex, color type, AD test year, birth year, and row-by-year), random effects (additive genetic, maternal genetic, and permanent environmental), and a covariate of age using ASReml 4.1. Likewise, pairwise bivariate analyses were conducted to estimate the phenotypic and genetic correlations among the studied traits. Both antigen- and virus capsid protein-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests (ELISA-G and ELISA-P) showed significant (P < 0.05) moderate positive genetic correlations (±SE) with maturation rate (from 0.36 ± 0.18 to 0.38 ± 0.19). ELISA-G showed a significant negative genetic correlation (±SE) with average daily gain (ADG, -0.37 ± 0.16). ELISA-P showed a significant positive moderate genetic correlation (±SE) with off-feed days (DOF, 0.42 ± 0.17). These findings indicated that selection for low ELISA scores would reduce the maturation rate, increase ADG (by ELISA-G), and minimize DOF (by ELISA-P). The iodine agglutination test (IAT) showed significant genetic correlations with DOF (0.73 ± 0.16), BW at 16 weeks of age (BW16, 0.45 ± 0.23), and BW at harvest (HW, -0.47 ± 0.20), indicating that selection for lower IAT scores would lead to lower DOF and BW16, and higher HW. These estimated genetic correlations suggested that the selection of AD tests would not cause adverse effects on the growth, feed efficiency, and feed intake of mink. The estimates from this study might strengthen the previous finding that ELISA-G could be applied as a reliable and practical indicator trait in the genetic selection of AD-resilient mink in AD-positive farms. The selection of Aleutian disease-resistant individuals based on Aleutian disease (AD) tests is seen as a potential method to control AD effectively. However, the knowledge regarding the genetic background of AD tests is limited. This study estimated the genetic and phenotypic correlations between Aleutian disease tests and body weight, growth, and feed-related traits in mink. The estimates in this study indicated that the growth, feed efficiency, and feed intake of mink would not be adversely influenced by the selection of AD tests. In the meantime, the estimates further illustrate that the antigen-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test could be applied as the most reliable and practical indicator trait to select AD-resilient mink in AD-positive farms.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
The selection of Aleutian disease-resistant individuals based on Aleutian disease (AD) tests is seen as a potential method to control AD effectively. However, the knowledge regarding the genetic background of AD tests is limited. This study estimated the genetic and phenotypic correlations between Aleutian disease tests and body weight, growth, and feed-related traits in mink. The estimates in this study indicated that the growth, feed efficiency, and feed intake of mink would not be adversely influenced by the selection of AD tests. In the meantime, the estimates further illustrate that the antigen-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test could be applied as the most reliable and practical indicator trait to select AD-resilient mink in AD-positive farms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36250683
pii: 6762000
doi: 10.1093/jas/skac346
pmc: PMC9733502
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

Int J Parasitol. 1996 Aug-Sep;26(8-9):857-68
pubmed: 8923135
Am J Pathol. 1973 May;71(2):331-44
pubmed: 4576760
J Anim Sci. 2007 Aug;85(8):1885-92
pubmed: 17504959
J Virol. 1996 Mar;70(3):1455-66
pubmed: 8627663
Vet Parasitol. 2015 Mar 15;208(3-4):231-7
pubmed: 25648284
J Vet Med Sci. 1999 Oct;61(10):1131-5
pubmed: 10563291
Res Vet Sci. 2017 Apr;111:127-134
pubmed: 28249174
J Anim Sci. 2004 Nov;82(11):3118-27
pubmed: 15542457
Front Genet. 2018 Oct 16;9:467
pubmed: 30386376
Front Genet. 2019 Jan 14;9:692
pubmed: 30693014
J Anim Sci. 2021 Aug 1;99(8):
pubmed: 34279039
J Anim Breed Genet. 2020 May;137(3):263-280
pubmed: 31709657
J Anim Sci. 2018 Sep 7;96(9):3565-3581
pubmed: 29905795
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1184-92
pubmed: 20172239
Viral Immunol. 2018 Jan/Feb;31(1):69-77
pubmed: 28829241
J Infect Dis. 1968 Dec;118(5):510-26
pubmed: 4178323
J Anim Sci. 2017 Aug;95(8):3346-3358
pubmed: 28805915
J Anim Sci. 2006 Aug;84(8):1999-2008
pubmed: 16864858
Genet Sel Evol. 2020 Oct 14;52(1):60
pubmed: 33054713
Anim Sci J. 2016 Sep;87(9):1099-105
pubmed: 26608237
Int J Parasitol. 1998 Nov;28(11):1797-804
pubmed: 9846618
Front Genet. 2019 Dec 13;10:1216
pubmed: 31921285
J Virol Methods. 2016 Sep;235:144-151
pubmed: 27283885
Vaccine. 2012 Dec 14;30(52):7625-9
pubmed: 23084853
J Anim Sci. 2020 Aug 1;98(8):
pubmed: 32730570
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2021 Sep 8;12(1):105
pubmed: 34493327
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2009 Jan;41(1):51-9
pubmed: 19052902
Animals (Basel). 2019 Dec 20;10(1):
pubmed: 31877627
Vet Microbiol. 2011 Apr 21;149(1-2):64-71
pubmed: 21112164
J Anim Sci. 2012 Jan;90(1):109-15
pubmed: 21890504
J Anim Sci. 2022 Aug 1;100(8):
pubmed: 35801647
Prev Vet Med. 2011 Oct 1;102(1):75-82
pubmed: 21788091
J Anim Sci. 1999 Dec;77(12):3168-75
pubmed: 10641860
Virology. 1987 May;158(1):174-80
pubmed: 2437696
Acta Vet Scand Suppl. 2001;94:89-91
pubmed: 11875858
J Exp Med. 1969 Sep 1;130(3):575-93
pubmed: 4979953
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Oct 1;106(3-4):332-8
pubmed: 22497690
J Anim Sci. 2021 Mar 1;99(3):
pubmed: 33585905
Acta Vet Scand. 2016 Jun 01;58(1):35
pubmed: 27250118
Infect Immun. 1973 Aug;8(2):264-71
pubmed: 4199157
PLoS One. 2009 Oct 19;4(10):e7508
pubmed: 19838306
Front Genet. 2019 Jan 08;9:660
pubmed: 30671080
Int J Parasitol. 1987 Oct;17(7):1355-63
pubmed: 3429127
Can Vet J. 1990 Oct;31(10):689-96
pubmed: 17423676
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 22;10(9):
pubmed: 32971980
J Anim Sci. 2020 Aug 18;98(Suppl 1):S150-S154
pubmed: 32810253
Infect Immun. 1982 Apr;36(1):379-86
pubmed: 6176546
Br Poult Sci. 2005 Feb;46(1):43-53
pubmed: 15835251
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009 Sep;16(9):1360-5
pubmed: 19641102

Auteurs

Guoyu Hu (G)

Department of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS, B2N 5E3, Canada.

Duy Ngoc Do (DN)

Department of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS, B2N 5E3, Canada.

Pourya Davoudi (P)

Department of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS, B2N 5E3, Canada.

Ghader Manafiazar (G)

Department of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS, B2N 5E3, Canada.

Alyson A Kelvin (AA)

Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization (VIDO), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E3, Canada.

Graham Plastow (G)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada.

Zhiquan Wang (Z)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada.

Mehdi Sargolzaei (M)

Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Select Sires Inc., Plain City, OH 43064, USA.

Younes Miar (Y)

Department of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS, B2N 5E3, Canada.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH