Population pharmacokinetics modeling and exposure-response analyses of cemiplimab in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.
Female
Humans
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ adverse effects
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ drug therapy
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
/ chemically induced
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Skin Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Journal
CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology
ISSN: 2163-8306
Titre abrégé: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101580011
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
revised:
01
08
2022
received:
19
04
2022
accepted:
03
08
2022
pubmed:
18
10
2022
medline:
18
11
2022
entrez:
17
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was previously developed for cemiplimab in patients with solid tumors, including advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Here, we update the existing PopPK model and characterize exposure-response relationships using efficacy and safety data obtained in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (R/M CC). To improve model stability and robustness of the existing PopPK model in 1062 patients, the random-effect error model was revised, and structural covariates were removed from the base model to be tested in the covariate analysis. The updated model was used for external validation of cemiplimab pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with R/M CC on cemiplimab monotherapy (350 mg every 3 weeks intravenously) from a phase III study (NCT03257267). Exposure-response relationships for cemiplimab efficacy (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], duration of response [DOR], objective response rate [ORR]), and safety (immune-related adverse events [irAEs]) were analyzed in 295 patients with R/M CC from the aforementioned study. The updated PopPK model showed improved stability with 94.8% successful bootstrap runs vs. 47.6% in the prior model. Cemiplimab exposure was similar across tumor types, including basal cell carcinoma, CSCC, and non-small cell lung cancer. External validation showed the updated model adequately described cemiplimab PK in patients with R/M CC. In exposure-response efficacy analyses, Cox proportional hazard modeling (CPHM) showed no trend between exposure and OS, Kaplan-Meier plots showed no trend between exposure and PFS or DOR, and logistic regression analyses conducted on ORR showed no exposure-response relationship. In exposure-response safety analyses, CPHM showed no trend between exposure and irAEs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36251220
doi: 10.1002/psp4.12855
pmc: PMC9662200
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
cemiplimab
6QVL057INT
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1458-1471Informations de copyright
© 2022 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):734-43
pubmed: 24552320
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 10;386(6):544-555
pubmed: 35139273
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jul;40(5):602-608
pubmed: 31500479
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):591-603
pubmed: 32007142
Ann Oncol. 2010 Jan;21(1):61-6
pubmed: 19605508
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 8;111(14):5147-52
pubmed: 24706858
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 8;111(14):5153-8
pubmed: 24706856
Mol Cancer Ther. 2017 May;16(5):861-870
pubmed: 28265006
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 1;33(19):2129-35
pubmed: 25732161
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2001 Oct;28(5):481-504
pubmed: 11768292
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2022 Nov;11(11):1458-1471
pubmed: 36251220
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Jul;110(1):65-70
pubmed: 18455781
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 May;101(5):657-666
pubmed: 28182273
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Dec;108(6):1156-1170
pubmed: 32557643
Drugs. 2020 Feb;80(3):217-227
pubmed: 31939072
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2021 Aug;48(4):479-494
pubmed: 33728546