3D printed kidney model could be an important educational tool for residents.
interobserver variability
residencies
three-dimensional printing
Journal
Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
ISSN: 1758-5910
Titre abrégé: Asian J Endosc Surg
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101506753
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
revised:
19
09
2022
received:
20
07
2022
accepted:
03
10
2022
medline:
4
4
2023
pubmed:
19
10
2022
entrez:
18
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to evaluate whether it is useful for junior physicians to use a three-dimensional (3D) kidney model when evaluating the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. An expert and four urology residents retrospectively evaluated the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores of 64 renal tumors (62 patients) that underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at our hospital. The expert evaluated 64 R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores with computed tomography (CT), whereas four residents evaluated 32 cases using CT alone and the other 32 cases using CT and a 3D kidney model. The consistency between the expert and residents was assessed by Cohen's kappa score. Patient-specific 3D kidney models were created in a gird style using a 3D printer based on CT or magnetic resonance imaging of the patient. For all four residents, the accuracy of the overall R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score was significantly higher with the 3D model and CT than with CT alone (P < .001). Regarding the individual components of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, the accuracy rates of "E," "N," "A," and "L" scores were higher with the 3D model and CT than with the CT alone (P = .020-.089). Patient-specific 3D-printed kidney models could improve the resident's understanding of the renal tumor complexity and could be an important educational tool for residents.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
197-202Informations de copyright
© 2022 Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009;182(3):844-853. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035
Schiavina R, Novara G, Borghesi M, et al. PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores correlate with perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of the Vattikuti Global Quality Initiative in Robotic Urologic Surgery (GQI-RUS) database. BJU Int. 2017;119(3):456-463. doi:10.1111/bju.13628
Borgmann H, Reiss AK, Kurosch M, et al. R.E.N.A.L. Score Outperforms PADUA Score, C-Index and DAP Score for Outcome Prediction of Nephron Sparing Surgery in a Selected Cohort. J Urol. 2016;196(3):664-671. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.176
Spaliviero M, Poon BY, Aras O, et al. Interobserver variability of R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and centrality index nephrometry score systems. World J Urol. 2015;33(6):853-858. doi:10.1007/s00345-014-1376-4
Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Checcucci E, et al. Development and validation of 3D printed virtual models for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy: urologists' and patients' perception. World J Urol. 2018;36(2):201-207. doi:10.1007/s00345-017-2126-1
Bernhard JC, Isotani S, Matsugasumi T, et al. Personalized 3D printed model of kidney and tumor anatomy: a useful tool for patient education. World J Urol. 2016;34(3):337-345. doi:10.1007/s00345-015-1632-2
Wake N, Rude T, Kang SK, et al. 3D printed renal cancer models derived from MRI data: application in pre-surgical planning. Abdom Radiol. 2017;42(5):1501-1509. doi:10.1007/s00261-016-1022-2
Yamazaki M, Takayama T, Fujisaki A, Kamimura T, Mashiko T, Fujimura T. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy of initial cases using a 3D square-block type kidney model. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(2):494-500. doi:10.21037/tau.2019.12.31
Mashiko T, Otani K, Kawano R, et al. Development of three-dimensional hollow elastic model for cerebral aneurysm clipping simulation enabling rapid and low cost prototyping. World Neurosurg. 2015;83(3):351-361. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.10.032
Lim PK, Stephenson GS, Keown TW, et al. Use of 3D Printed Models in Resident Education for the Classification of Acetabulum Fractures. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(6):1679-1684. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.04.019
Montgomery SJ, Kooner SS, Ludwig TE, Schneider PS. Impact of 3D Printed Calcaneal Models on Fracture Understanding and Confidence in Orthopedic Surgery Residents. J Surg Educ. 2020;77(2):472-478. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.10.004
Knoedler M, Feibus AH, Lange A, et al. Individualized Physical 3-dimensional Kidney Tumor Models Constructed From 3-dimensional Printers Result in Improved Trainee Anatomic Understanding. Urology. 2015;85(6):1257-1261. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.053
Vilaseca RM, Westphalen AC, Reis HF, et al. Reproducibility and interobserver agreement of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: focus on imaging features. Radiol Bras. 2017;50(1):7-12. doi:10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0174
Kolla SB, Spiess PE, Sexton WJ. Interobserver reliability of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system. Urology. 2011;78(3):592-594. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2011.05.023
Weight CJ, Atwell TD, Fazzio RT, et al. A multidisciplinary evaluation of inter-reviewer agreement of the nephrometry score and the prediction of long-term outcomes. J Urol. 2011;186(4):1223-1228. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.052
Monn MF, Gellhaus PT, Masterson TA, et al. R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry scoring: how well correlated are urologist, radiologist, and collaborator scores? J Endourol. 2014;28(8):1006-1010. doi:10.1089/end.2014.0166
Porpiglia F, Amparore D, Checcucci E, et al. Three-dimensional virtual imaging of renal tumours: a new tool to improve the accuracy of nephrometry scores. BJU Int. 2019;124(6):945-954. doi:10.1111/bju.14894
Teishima J, Takayama Y, Iwaguro S, et al. Usefulness of personalized three-dimensional printed model on the satisfaction of preoperative education for patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and their families. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(6):1061-1066. doi:10.1007/s11255-018-1881-2