The formation process and mechanism of gastrointestinal anastomosis after retrieval anchor-assisted endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy: a preclinical study.


Journal

Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2023
Historique:
received: 21 11 2021
accepted: 14 08 2022
pubmed: 27 10 2022
medline: 21 3 2023
entrez: 26 10 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a promising method of treating gastric outlet obstruction. However, no study has investigated gastrointestinal anastomosis formation after EUS-GE. We aimed to evaluate the formation of gastrointestinal anastomosis after EUS-GE in a porcine model. Retrieval anchor-assisted EUS-GE was performed on 15 Bama mini pigs. Five pigs each were randomly euthanized 3, 7, and 14 days postoperatively to evaluate the formation of gastrointestinal anastomosis and measure the anastomotic distance. The expression of transforming growth factor-β1(TGF-β1) and Smad3 in the anastomosis site were examined by immunohistochemistry. EUS-GE was successfully performed in all 15 pigs. The mean procedure time was 29.2 ± 6.0 (range 18-40) minutes. The anastomotic distance was 34.0 ± 3.6 cm in 14 pigs. The site of gastroenterostomy of one pig was at the ileum. For pigs euthanized 3 days postoperatively, the structure was mechanically maintained by a stent. For pigs euthanized 7 or 14 days postoperatively, the stomach and small intestine were anastomosed to form a stable structure. The level of TGF-β1 and Smad3 in the anastomosis site gradually increased from 3 to 14 days after EUS-GE. TGF-β1 and Smad3 expression had a significant difference between 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days after EUS-GE (P < 0.05). For EUS-GE, the stomach and small intestine were initially linked together mechanically and spontaneously anastomosed to form a stable structure 7 days postoperatively. TGF-β1 and Smad3 play an important role in the formation of a stable structure of gastrointestinal anastomosis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a promising method of treating gastric outlet obstruction. However, no study has investigated gastrointestinal anastomosis formation after EUS-GE. We aimed to evaluate the formation of gastrointestinal anastomosis after EUS-GE in a porcine model.
METHODS
Retrieval anchor-assisted EUS-GE was performed on 15 Bama mini pigs. Five pigs each were randomly euthanized 3, 7, and 14 days postoperatively to evaluate the formation of gastrointestinal anastomosis and measure the anastomotic distance. The expression of transforming growth factor-β1(TGF-β1) and Smad3 in the anastomosis site were examined by immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS
EUS-GE was successfully performed in all 15 pigs. The mean procedure time was 29.2 ± 6.0 (range 18-40) minutes. The anastomotic distance was 34.0 ± 3.6 cm in 14 pigs. The site of gastroenterostomy of one pig was at the ileum. For pigs euthanized 3 days postoperatively, the structure was mechanically maintained by a stent. For pigs euthanized 7 or 14 days postoperatively, the stomach and small intestine were anastomosed to form a stable structure. The level of TGF-β1 and Smad3 in the anastomosis site gradually increased from 3 to 14 days after EUS-GE. TGF-β1 and Smad3 expression had a significant difference between 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days after EUS-GE (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
For EUS-GE, the stomach and small intestine were initially linked together mechanically and spontaneously anastomosed to form a stable structure 7 days postoperatively. TGF-β1 and Smad3 play an important role in the formation of a stable structure of gastrointestinal anastomosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36289084
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09565-4
pii: 10.1007/s00464-022-09565-4
doi:

Substances chimiques

Transforming Growth Factor beta1 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2043-2049

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Coronel E, Chapman CG, Matthews J et al (2018) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for the treatment of gastroduodenal obstruction in severe chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy 50:285–287
pubmed: 29245160
Wang G, Liu X, Wang S et al (2019) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy: a promising alternative to surgery. J Transl Int Med 7:93–99
pubmed: 31637179 pmcid: 6795053
Manuel-Vazquez A, Latorre-Fragua R, Ramiro-Perez C et al (2018) Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy for gastric outlet obstruction in patients with unresectable hepatopancreatobiliary cancers: a personal series and systematic review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 24:1978–1988
pubmed: 29760541 pmcid: 5949711
Debourdeau A, Caillol F, Zemmour C et al (2021) Endoscopic management of concomitant biliary and duodenal malignant obstruction: impact of the timing of drainage for one vs. two procedures and the modalities of biliary drainage. Endosc Ultrasound. 10:124–133
pubmed: 33818527 pmcid: 8098836
Iqbal U, Khara HS, Hu Y et al (2020) EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 9:16–23
pubmed: 31898587
Ge PS, Young JY, Dong W et al (2019) EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stent placement for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc 33:3404–3411
pubmed: 30725254 pmcid: 6684873
Perez-Miranda M, Tyberg A, Poletto D et al (2017) EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy versus laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy: an international collaborative study. J Clin Gastroenterol 51:896–899
pubmed: 28697151
Khashab MA, Bukhari M, Baron TH et al (2017) International multicenter comparative trial of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastrojejunostomy for the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open 5:E275–E281
pubmed: 28382326 pmcid: 5378550
Parsa N, Nieto JM, Powers P et al (2020) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis using 20-mm versus 15-mm lumen-apposing metal stents: an international, multicenter, case-matched study. Endoscopy 52:211–219
pubmed: 32000275
Khan Z, Hayat U, Moraveji S et al (2021) EUS-guided pancreatic ductal intervention: a comprehensive literature review. Endosc Ultrasound 10:98–102
pubmed: 33463554 pmcid: 8098848
Luk SW, Irani S, Krishnamoorthi R, Wong Lau JY et al (2019) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy for high risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 51:722–732
pubmed: 31238375
Dhindsa BS, Mashiana HS, Dhaliwal A et al (2020) EUS-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 9:101–109
pubmed: 32295967 pmcid: 7279084
Kakked G, Salameh H, Cheesman AR et al (2020) Primary EUS-guided biliary drainage versus ERCP drainage for the management of malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 9:298–307
pubmed: 32655080 pmcid: 7811719
Sakamoto Y, Hijioka S, Maruki Y et al (2019) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using a metal stent for the treatment of afferent loop syndrome. Endoscopy 51:E153–E155
pubmed: 30934100
Oung B, Faller J, Lienhart-Chambon I et al (2020) Single-step endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy and ERCP in patient with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy after right lobe hepatectomy. Endoscopy 52:E229–E231
pubmed: 31863435
Wang W, Qi K, Jin Z et al (2019) Endoscopic exchange of a lumen-apposing metal stent after endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy in severe acute pancreatitis. Endoscopy 51:E18–E19
pubmed: 30406637
Chen YI, James TW, Agarwal A et al (2018) EUS-guided gastroenterostomy in management of benign gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open 6:E363-e368
pubmed: 29527559 pmcid: 5842065
Miller CS, Chen YI, Haito Chavez Y et al (2020) Double-balloon endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy: simplifying a complex technique towards widespread use. Endoscopy 52:151–152
pubmed: 31529439
Binmoeller KF, Shah JN (2012) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using novel tools designed for transluminal therapy: a porcine study. Endoscopy 44:499–503
pubmed: 22531985
Collin A, Brahmia S, Rostain F et al (2021) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy with water-jet filling technique through a 19G needle to treat complete malignant duodenal obstruction. Endoscopy 53:E7–E8
pubmed: 32428950
Hu J, Zhang K, Sun S (2019) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided retrievable puncture anchor-assisted gastroenterostomy. Dig Endosc 31:e11–e12
pubmed: 30306661
Hu J, Wang G, Zhang K et al (2020) Retrieval anchor-assisted endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction. Scand J Gastroenterol 55:865–868
pubmed: 32643452

Auteurs

Jinlong Hu (J)

Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.

Guoxin Wang (G)

Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.

Haixin Gao (H)

Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.

Shiyun Sheng (S)

Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.

Siyu Sun (S)

Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China. sun-siyu@163.com.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH