Additive effectiveness of acrylonitrile-co-methallyl sulfonate surface-treated membranes in the treatment of pneumonia: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.

acrylonitrile-co-methallyl sulfonate membrane continuous renal replacement therapy cytokine adsorption therapy pneumonia sepsis

Journal

Artificial organs
ISSN: 1525-1594
Titre abrégé: Artif Organs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802778

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
revised: 30 09 2022
received: 25 06 2022
accepted: 11 10 2022
pubmed: 1 11 2022
medline: 3 2 2023
entrez: 31 10 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The acrylonitrile-co-methallyl sulfonate surface-treated (AN69ST) membrane has cytokine adsorption capacity and is used for treating sepsis. This study aimed to compare the effects of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) using the AN69ST membrane with those of CRRT using other membranes for patients with pneumonia-associated sepsis. This retrospective, propensity score-matched, cohort study was based on a nationwide Japanese inpatient database. We included data from adults hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia, who received CRRT using either the AN69ST membrane or another membrane within 2 days of admission, and who were discharged from the hospitals between September 2014, and March 2017. Propensity score matching was used to compare in-hospital mortality between the two groups. Eligible patients (N = 2393) were categorized into an AN69ST group (N = 631) and a non-AN69ST group (N = 1762). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 38.9%. Among the 545 propensity-matched patient pairs, the in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in the AN69ST group than in the non-AN69ST group (35.8 vs. 41.8%, p = 0.046). Among patients with pneumonia-associated sepsis treated with CRRT, CRRT with the AN69ST membrane was associated with a significantly lower in-hospital mortality than CRRT with standard membranes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The acrylonitrile-co-methallyl sulfonate surface-treated (AN69ST) membrane has cytokine adsorption capacity and is used for treating sepsis. This study aimed to compare the effects of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) using the AN69ST membrane with those of CRRT using other membranes for patients with pneumonia-associated sepsis.
METHODS METHODS
This retrospective, propensity score-matched, cohort study was based on a nationwide Japanese inpatient database. We included data from adults hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia, who received CRRT using either the AN69ST membrane or another membrane within 2 days of admission, and who were discharged from the hospitals between September 2014, and March 2017. Propensity score matching was used to compare in-hospital mortality between the two groups.
RESULTS RESULTS
Eligible patients (N = 2393) were categorized into an AN69ST group (N = 631) and a non-AN69ST group (N = 1762). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 38.9%. Among the 545 propensity-matched patient pairs, the in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in the AN69ST group than in the non-AN69ST group (35.8 vs. 41.8%, p = 0.046).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Among patients with pneumonia-associated sepsis treated with CRRT, CRRT with the AN69ST membrane was associated with a significantly lower in-hospital mortality than CRRT with standard membranes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36310400
doi: 10.1111/aor.14435
pmc: PMC10099711
doi:

Substances chimiques

Acrylonitrile MP1U0D42PE
methallyl sulfonate ARA0T9ZU4A

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

408-416

Subventions

Organisme : Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
ID : 17H04141
Organisme : Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan
ID : 19AA2007
Organisme : Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan
ID : H30-Policy-Designated-004

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Artificial Organs published by International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Crit Care Resusc. 2013 Sep;15(3):198-204
pubmed: 23944206
Thorax. 2009 Jul;64(7):587-91
pubmed: 19131448
Eur Respir J. 2013 Jun;41(6):1378-85
pubmed: 23258791
Crit Care. 2015 Apr 06;19:146
pubmed: 25887923
Artif Organs. 2023 Feb;47(2):408-416
pubmed: 36310400
J Crit Care. 2019 Feb;49:172-178
pubmed: 30448517
Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2209-20
pubmed: 23860248
Acute Med Surg. 2018 Dec 13;6(1):60-67
pubmed: 30651999
Blood Purif. 2020;49(3):364-371
pubmed: 31940608
Breathe (Sheff). 2019 Sep;15(3):216-225
pubmed: 31508159
Blood Purif. 2014;38(3-4):167-73
pubmed: 25471681
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 May 14;9(1):56
pubmed: 31089920
Ann Surg. 2013 Apr;257(4):640-6
pubmed: 23023204
Artif Organs. 2020 Sep;44(9):918-925
pubmed: 32516506
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2:S27-72
pubmed: 17278083
Ther Apher Dial. 2011 Aug;15(4):385-93
pubmed: 21884474
Epidemiol Infect. 2008 Feb;136(2):232-40
pubmed: 17445319
Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1250-6
pubmed: 12682500
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Feb;44(2):167-178
pubmed: 29204670
Blood Purif. 2017;44(3):184-192
pubmed: 28609776
Int J Infect Dis. 2016 Aug;49:87-93
pubmed: 27235085
Intern Med. 2013;52(3):317-24
pubmed: 23370738
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 29;369(9):840-51
pubmed: 23984731
Contrib Nephrol. 2010;166:47-53
pubmed: 20472991
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999 Apr;10(4):846-53
pubmed: 10203370
Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9
pubmed: 16224307
Blood Purif. 2014;38(3-4):211-8
pubmed: 25531978
J Chemother. 2001 Nov;13 Spec No 1(1):159-72
pubmed: 11936361
Anesthesiology. 2011 Jan;114(1):84-90
pubmed: 21169796
Toxicon. 2018 Jul;149:45-53
pubmed: 29056305
Biomaterials. 2008 Mar;29(9):1139-46
pubmed: 18078988
N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 17;348(16):1546-54
pubmed: 12700374
J Intensive Care. 2017 Jul 18;5:46
pubmed: 28729905
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Mar 16;152(6):393-5
pubmed: 20231571
Kidney Int. 2016 Mar;89(3):555-64
pubmed: 26880452
Crit Care Med. 2003 Aug;31(8):2228-37
pubmed: 12973184

Auteurs

Kentaro Hayashi (K)

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.

Yusuke Sasabuchi (Y)

Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.

Hiroki Matsui (H)

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Mikio Nakajima (M)

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Emergency and Critical Care Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Hiroyuki Ohbe (H)

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Kiyohide Fushimi (K)

Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Kazuyuki Ono (K)

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.

Hideo Yasunaga (H)

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH