Quantification of Prostate Cancer Metabolism Using 3D Multiecho bSSFP and Hyperpolarized [1-
bSSFP
hyperpolarized [1-13C] pyruvate
metabolic 13C-MRI
Journal
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
ISSN: 1522-2586
Titre abrégé: J Magn Reson Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9105850
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2023
06 2023
Historique:
revised:
09
09
2022
received:
20
05
2022
accepted:
09
09
2022
medline:
18
5
2023
pubmed:
1
11
2022
entrez:
31
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Three-dimensional (3D) multiecho balanced steady-state free precession (ME-bSSFP) has previously been demonstrated in preclinical hyperpolarized (HP) To validate a signal simulation framework for the use of sequence parameter optimization. To demonstrate the feasibility of ME-bSSFP for HP Retrospective single-center cohort study. Phantoms containing aqueous solutions of [1- The primary endpoint was the analysis of pyruvate-to-lactate conversion in PCa and healthy prostate regions of interest (ROIs) using model-free area under the curve (AUC) ratios and a one-directional kinetic model (k Pearson correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals and paired t-tests. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Strong correlations between simulated and empirical ME-bSSFP signals were found (r > 0.96). Therefore, the simulation framework was used for sequence optimization. Whole prostate metabolic HP Metabolic HP 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Three-dimensional (3D) multiecho balanced steady-state free precession (ME-bSSFP) has previously been demonstrated in preclinical hyperpolarized (HP)
PURPOSE
To validate a signal simulation framework for the use of sequence parameter optimization. To demonstrate the feasibility of ME-bSSFP for HP
STUDY TYPE
Retrospective single-center cohort study.
PHANTOMS/POPULATION
Phantoms containing aqueous solutions of [1-
ASSESSMENT
The primary endpoint was the analysis of pyruvate-to-lactate conversion in PCa and healthy prostate regions of interest (ROIs) using model-free area under the curve (AUC) ratios and a one-directional kinetic model (k
STATISTICAL TESTS
Pearson correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals and paired t-tests. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
RESULTS
Strong correlations between simulated and empirical ME-bSSFP signals were found (r > 0.96). Therefore, the simulation framework was used for sequence optimization. Whole prostate metabolic HP
DATA CONCLUSION
Metabolic HP
EVIDENCE LEVEL
2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Substances chimiques
Pyruvic Acid
8558G7RUTR
Lactic Acid
33X04XA5AT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1865-1875Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M009092/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C42780/A26854
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/R505973/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Références
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jul;38(1):2-11
pubmed: 23633246
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Sep;78(3):963-975
pubmed: 27770458
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Mar;53(3):686-702
pubmed: 32039520
NMR Biomed. 2020 Jun;33(6):e4291
pubmed: 32154970
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Feb;20(2):146-153
pubmed: 30712281
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Apr;49(4):781-3
pubmed: 12652552
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Sep;32(3):654-62
pubmed: 20815064
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 25;103(30):11270-5
pubmed: 16837573
Nat Med. 2014 Jan;20(1):93-7
pubmed: 24317119
MAGMA. 2009 Aug;22(4):251-6
pubmed: 19367422
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Nov;62(5):1091-8
pubmed: 19780158
NMR Biomed. 2018 Nov;31(11):e3997
pubmed: 30230646
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Nov;80(5):2062-2072
pubmed: 29575178
Lancet. 2003 Mar 29;361(9363):1122-8
pubmed: 12672328
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Feb;77(2):826-832
pubmed: 26898849
Theranostics. 2018 May 23;8(12):3400-3407
pubmed: 29930738
Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 May;28(4):459-65
pubmed: 20171034
NMR Biomed. 2016 Apr;29(4):387-99
pubmed: 27414749
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Sep;80(3):1048-1060
pubmed: 29451329
BJR Case Rep. 2019 May 15;5(3):20190026
pubmed: 31555479
Radiology. 1984 Oct;153(1):189-94
pubmed: 6089263
Sci Transl Med. 2013 Aug 14;5(198):198ra108
pubmed: 23946197
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017 Apr;113:3-23
pubmed: 27599979
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 2;100(18):10158-63
pubmed: 12930897
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Jan;71(1):219-29
pubmed: 23412971
MAGMA. 2006 Nov;19(5):267-73
pubmed: 17119904
Br J Radiol. 2022 Jun 1;95(1134):20210770
pubmed: 35230136
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Jun;6(3):432-443
pubmed: 28725585
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun;11(6):346-53
pubmed: 24840072
J Nucl Med. 2017 Apr;58(4):523-532
pubmed: 28232605