Resting-state BOLD signal variability is associated with individual differences in metacontrol.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 11 2022
Historique:
received: 20 03 2022
accepted: 30 09 2022
entrez: 2 11 2022
pubmed: 3 11 2022
medline: 4 11 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Numerous studies demonstrate that moment-to-moment neural variability is behaviorally relevant and beneficial for tasks and behaviors requiring cognitive flexibility. However, it remains unclear whether the positive effect of neural variability also holds for cognitive persistence. Moreover, different brain variability measures have been used in previous studies, yet comparisons between them are lacking. In the current study, we examined the association between resting-state BOLD signal variability and two metacontrol policies (i.e., persistence vs. flexibility). Brain variability was estimated from resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) data using two different approaches (i.e., Standard Deviation (SD), and Mean Square Successive Difference (MSSD)) and metacontrol biases were assessed by three metacontrol-sensitive tasks. Results showed that brain variability measured by SD and MSSD was highly positively related. Critically, higher variability measured by MSSD in the attention network, parietal and frontal network, frontal and ACC network, parietal and motor network, and higher variability measured by SD in the parietal and motor network, parietal and frontal network were associated with reduced persistence (or greater flexibility) of metacontrol (i.e., larger Stroop effect or worse RAT performance). These results show that the beneficial effect of brain signal variability on cognitive control depends on the metacontrol states involved. Our study highlights the importance of temporal variability of rsfMRI activity in understanding the neural underpinnings of cognitive control.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36319653
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21703-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-21703-5
pmc: PMC9626555
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

18425

Subventions

Organisme : Chinese Scholarship Council
ID : 201806990039
Organisme : Advanced Grant of the European Research Council
ID : ERC-2015-AdG-694722

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Dec;24(12):2385-99
pubmed: 22905818
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 31;8:100
pubmed: 28197117
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):343-353
pubmed: 14979809
Psychophysiology. 2021 Jul;58(7):e13714
pubmed: 33210312
J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 06;36(14):3978-87
pubmed: 27053205
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 15;69(12):e113-25
pubmed: 21531388
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt A):43-58
pubmed: 28088534
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Nov;104(5):2667-76
pubmed: 20844116
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Oct;4(10):e1000196
pubmed: 18846206
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Jan;12(1):43-56
pubmed: 21170073
Psychol Bull. 2019 May;145(5):508-535
pubmed: 30896187
Neuroimage. 2004 Jul;22(3):1214-22
pubmed: 15219593
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;55(6):685-710
pubmed: 24628425
Neuroimage. 2002 Jun;16(2):349-60
pubmed: 12030821
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Dec 1;22(12):747-753
pubmed: 31123756
Neuroimage. 2018 Dec;183:776-787
pubmed: 30149140
Neuroinformatics. 2016 Jul;14(3):339-51
pubmed: 27075850
Neural Comput. 1995 Nov;7(6):1129-59
pubmed: 7584893
Front Syst Neurosci. 2011 Feb 04;5:2
pubmed: 21442040
Neuroimage. 2020 Aug 15;217:116836
pubmed: 32283277
Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Nov 1;64(9):739-49
pubmed: 18620336
Neuron. 2021 Mar 3;109(5):751-766
pubmed: 33596406
J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 9;30(23):7755-7
pubmed: 20534823
J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 23;31(12):4496-503
pubmed: 21430150
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Mar;23(3):684-93
pubmed: 22419679
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017 Apr;55(4):631-640
pubmed: 27402343
Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):332-61
pubmed: 2200075
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Jun 20;12(7):415-26
pubmed: 21685932
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 1;169:510-523
pubmed: 29253658
Neuron. 2013 Aug 21;79(4):798-813
pubmed: 23972601
Br J Psychol. 1969 Feb;60(1):31-9
pubmed: 5779026
Neuroimage. 2001 Jan;13(1):29-36
pubmed: 11133306
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Sep;22(9):747-751
pubmed: 30017252
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018 Jun;20(2):133-140
pubmed: 30250390
Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 May 14;4:13
pubmed: 20577591
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 23;106(25):10302-7
pubmed: 19497858
PLoS Biol. 2015 Dec 29;13(12):e1002328
pubmed: 26713863
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 28;11:329
pubmed: 28701934
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):759-768
pubmed: 31269206
J Neurosci. 2010 Jan 27;30(4):1426-34
pubmed: 20107069
Cereb Cortex. 2016 May;26(5):2074-2083
pubmed: 25750252
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Sep;62:403-23
pubmed: 25068705
Front Psychol. 2012 Apr 18;3:116
pubmed: 22529832
Brain Imaging Behav. 2014 Jun;8(2):274-83
pubmed: 24008589
J Neurosci. 2017 May 31;37(22):5539-5548
pubmed: 28473644
Neuroimage. 2007 Oct 15;38(1):95-113
pubmed: 17761438
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Nov;24(11):2931-40
pubmed: 23749875
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Nov;36(11):4383-93
pubmed: 26354091
Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 1;246:118761
pubmed: 34861396
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 May;30(5):733-745
pubmed: 32410131
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 14;54(4):2950-9
pubmed: 20974260
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jan;22(1):158-65
pubmed: 21616982
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Oct 16;12:411
pubmed: 30459577
J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Nov;12(6):988-1000
pubmed: 11177419
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Apr;34(5):670-7
pubmed: 20026186
J Neurophysiol. 2019 May 1;121(5):1633-1643
pubmed: 30811254
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019 Aug;4(8):743-750
pubmed: 31103546
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2142-54
pubmed: 22019881
J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 7;30(14):4914-21
pubmed: 20371811
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 15;237:118149
pubmed: 33991695
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011 Jun;21(3):402-7
pubmed: 21531543
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 15;210:116572
pubmed: 31972282
J Cogn Enhanc. 2017;1(2):115-121
pubmed: 32226918
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Feb;33(2):279-302
pubmed: 33135966

Auteurs

Chenyan Zhang (C)

Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Christian Beste (C)

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
University Neuropsychology Center, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China.

Luisa Prochazkova (L)

Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Kangcheng Wang (K)

School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China.

Sebastian P H Speer (SPH)

Social Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Ale Smidts (A)

Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Maarten A S Boksem (MAS)

Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Bernhard Hommel (B)

Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. bh@bhommel.onmicrosoft.com.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. bh@bhommel.onmicrosoft.com.
School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China. bh@bhommel.onmicrosoft.com.

Articles similaires

Humans Ketamine Propofol Pulmonary Atelectasis Female
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms, Imaging Infant, Newborn Signal-To-Noise Ratio
1.00
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Infant, Newborn Infant, Premature
alpha-Synuclein Humans Animals Mice Lewy Body Disease

Classifications MeSH