Public awareness and knowledge of sepsis: a cross-sectional survey of adults in Canada.
Awareness
Critical care
Knowledge
Public health
Sepsis
Surveys and questionnaires
Journal
Critical care (London, England)
ISSN: 1466-609X
Titre abrégé: Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9801902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 11 2022
03 11 2022
Historique:
received:
29
08
2022
accepted:
15
10
2022
entrez:
4
11
2022
pubmed:
5
11
2022
medline:
8
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sepsis is a life-threatening complication of the body's response to infection. The financial, medical, and psychological costs of sepsis to individuals and to the healthcare system are high. Most sepsis cases originate in the community, making public awareness of sepsis essential to early diagnosis and treatment. There has been no comprehensive examination of adult's sepsis knowledge in Canada. We administered an online structured survey to English- or French-literate adults in Canada. The questionnaire comprised 28 questions in three domains: awareness, knowledge, and information access. Sampling was stratified by age, sex, and geography and weighted to 2016 census data. We used descriptive statistics to summarize responses; demographic differences were tested using the Rao-Scott correction for weighted chi-squared tests and associations using multiple variable regression. Sixty-one percent of 3200 adults sampled had heard of sepsis. Awareness differed by respondent's residential region, sex, education, and ethnic group (p < 0.001, all). The odds of having heard of sepsis were higher for females, older adults, respondents with some or completed college/university education, and respondents who self-identified as Black, White, or of mixed ethnicity (p < 0.01, all). Respondent's knowledge of sepsis definitions, symptoms, risk factors, and prevention measures was generally low (53.0%, 31.5%, 16.5%, and 36.3%, respectively). Only 25% of respondents recognized vaccination as a preventive strategy. The strongest predictors of sepsis knowledge were previous exposure to sepsis, healthcare employment, female sex, and a college/university education (p < 0.001, all). Respondents most frequently reported hearing about sepsis through television (27.7%) and preferred to learn about sepsis from healthcare providers (53.1%). Sepsis can quickly cause life-altering physical and psychological effects and 39% of adults sampled in Canada have not heard of it. Critically, a minority (32%) knew about signs, risk factors, and strategies to lower risk. Education initiatives should focus messaging on infection prevention, employ broad media strategies, and use primary healthcare providers to disseminate evidence-based information. Future work could explore whether efforts to raise public awareness of sepsis might be bolstered or hindered by current discourse around COVID-19, particularly those centered on vaccination.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Sepsis is a life-threatening complication of the body's response to infection. The financial, medical, and psychological costs of sepsis to individuals and to the healthcare system are high. Most sepsis cases originate in the community, making public awareness of sepsis essential to early diagnosis and treatment. There has been no comprehensive examination of adult's sepsis knowledge in Canada.
METHODS
We administered an online structured survey to English- or French-literate adults in Canada. The questionnaire comprised 28 questions in three domains: awareness, knowledge, and information access. Sampling was stratified by age, sex, and geography and weighted to 2016 census data. We used descriptive statistics to summarize responses; demographic differences were tested using the Rao-Scott correction for weighted chi-squared tests and associations using multiple variable regression.
RESULTS
Sixty-one percent of 3200 adults sampled had heard of sepsis. Awareness differed by respondent's residential region, sex, education, and ethnic group (p < 0.001, all). The odds of having heard of sepsis were higher for females, older adults, respondents with some or completed college/university education, and respondents who self-identified as Black, White, or of mixed ethnicity (p < 0.01, all). Respondent's knowledge of sepsis definitions, symptoms, risk factors, and prevention measures was generally low (53.0%, 31.5%, 16.5%, and 36.3%, respectively). Only 25% of respondents recognized vaccination as a preventive strategy. The strongest predictors of sepsis knowledge were previous exposure to sepsis, healthcare employment, female sex, and a college/university education (p < 0.001, all). Respondents most frequently reported hearing about sepsis through television (27.7%) and preferred to learn about sepsis from healthcare providers (53.1%).
CONCLUSIONS
Sepsis can quickly cause life-altering physical and psychological effects and 39% of adults sampled in Canada have not heard of it. Critically, a minority (32%) knew about signs, risk factors, and strategies to lower risk. Education initiatives should focus messaging on infection prevention, employ broad media strategies, and use primary healthcare providers to disseminate evidence-based information. Future work could explore whether efforts to raise public awareness of sepsis might be bolstered or hindered by current discourse around COVID-19, particularly those centered on vaccination.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36329489
doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04215-6
pii: 10.1186/s13054-022-04215-6
pmc: PMC9632573
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
337Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 430986
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Crit Care. 2018 Oct 28;22(1):273
pubmed: 30368239
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2048623
pubmed: 35417284
Crit Care Med. 2022 Aug 1;50(8):1187-1197
pubmed: 35481953
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34
pubmed: 15471760
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;102:134-138
pubmed: 29793001
CMAJ. 2008 Jul 29;179(3):245-52
pubmed: 18663204
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211
pubmed: 31954465
Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;49(2):215-227
pubmed: 33372748
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 27;13:98
pubmed: 25927426
JAMA. 2022 Jan 11;327(2):117-118
pubmed: 34940801
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e187571
pubmed: 30768188
Crit Care. 2018 Jan 17;22(1):7
pubmed: 29343292
Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;37(1):167-70
pubmed: 19123265
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2014 Sep 30;1(1):41-48
pubmed: 27752551
Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;49(3):e219-e234
pubmed: 33555780
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):739-740
pubmed: 32777028
Int J Stroke. 2015 Apr;10(3):324-30
pubmed: 25130981
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD000389
pubmed: 11869574
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2021 Oct 1;27(5):474-479
pubmed: 34292175
Mol Med. 2019 Dec 31;26(1):6
pubmed: 31892321
Emerg Med J. 2014 Jul;31(7):536-540
pubmed: 23892414
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Oct;44(10):1771-1773
pubmed: 30027308
Interact J Med Res. 2020 Jun 15;9(2):e16195
pubmed: 32538794
Crit Care. 2021 Jun 30;25(1):224
pubmed: 34193220
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 04;19(4):e92
pubmed: 28377367
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;21(2):e52-e106
pubmed: 32032273
Crit Care. 2012 Sep 13;16(5):152
pubmed: 22971299
BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 02;13:915
pubmed: 24088381
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 22;14(8):e0221596
pubmed: 31437248
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e206004
pubmed: 32633762
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 28;67(8):1300-1302
pubmed: 29846544
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 23;15(10):e0241259
pubmed: 33095836
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2016 Nov;18(11):37
pubmed: 27709504
Eur Stroke J. 2018 Jun;3(2):117-125
pubmed: 31008344
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 13;9(8):e104289
pubmed: 25119714
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jan 6;112(1):207-16
pubmed: 25461805
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 19;11(1):4263
pubmed: 33608563
Health Promot Int. 2015 Sep;30(3):736-45
pubmed: 23985248
Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):1889-1897
pubmed: 30048332