Diversity in German-speaking medical ethics and humanities.
Academia
Austria
Diversity
Gender
Germany
Medical ethics
Medical humanities
Race
Switzerland
Journal
Journal of bioethical inquiry
ISSN: 1872-4353
Titre abrégé: J Bioeth Inq
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101250741
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2022
12 2022
Historique:
received:
21
09
2021
accepted:
19
05
2022
pubmed:
8
11
2022
medline:
11
2
2023
entrez:
7
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bioethics can play an important role in addressing diversity both in and outside of academia, setting precedents for meaningful contributions to public discourse, research, teaching, training, and policy development. However, in order to do so, these conversations also need to reflect on the issue of diversity within the field of bioethics across the globe. This study aims to examine current gender representation and diversity at medical ethics and humanities institutes in Germany, the German-speaking areas of Switzerland, and Austria. A total of forty-nine medical ethics and humanities institutes from Germany (n=42), the German-speaking areas of Switzerland (n=5), and Austria (n=2) were included in the study. Institutes websites were reviewed in the first week of March 2021 and the details of each staff member listed on the website recorded. Overall, a total of 964 staff members were identified at the forty-nine German-speaking medical ethics and humanities institutes. Just over half (530/964; 55%) of all staff were female. There were significant differences between gender in some staff positions: 64.6 per cent (31/48) of directors were male (χ There has been a significant push to address gender diversity in German-speaking academia, and this study finds overall good gender parity in medical ethics and humanities institutes. However, there has not been a similar openness to discussing issues of systemic racism or how other forms of inequality affect academic diversity. Taking diversity seriously requires opening up conversations around intersectionality, including difficult conversations around race and cultural background that have long been taboo in German-speaking countries.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Bioethics can play an important role in addressing diversity both in and outside of academia, setting precedents for meaningful contributions to public discourse, research, teaching, training, and policy development. However, in order to do so, these conversations also need to reflect on the issue of diversity within the field of bioethics across the globe. This study aims to examine current gender representation and diversity at medical ethics and humanities institutes in Germany, the German-speaking areas of Switzerland, and Austria.
METHODS
A total of forty-nine medical ethics and humanities institutes from Germany (n=42), the German-speaking areas of Switzerland (n=5), and Austria (n=2) were included in the study. Institutes websites were reviewed in the first week of March 2021 and the details of each staff member listed on the website recorded.
RESULTS
Overall, a total of 964 staff members were identified at the forty-nine German-speaking medical ethics and humanities institutes. Just over half (530/964; 55%) of all staff were female. There were significant differences between gender in some staff positions: 64.6 per cent (31/48) of directors were male (χ
CONCLUSIONS
There has been a significant push to address gender diversity in German-speaking academia, and this study finds overall good gender parity in medical ethics and humanities institutes. However, there has not been a similar openness to discussing issues of systemic racism or how other forms of inequality affect academic diversity. Taking diversity seriously requires opening up conversations around intersectionality, including difficult conversations around race and cultural background that have long been taboo in German-speaking countries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36342632
doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10215-6
pii: 10.1007/s11673-022-10215-6
pmc: PMC9908651
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
643-653Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Mar;18(1):13-22
pubmed: 33415595
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Mar;18(1):113-116
pubmed: 33415592
Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring;3(2):1-11
pubmed: 12859798
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(4):27-9
pubmed: 26982918
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(4):3-12
pubmed: 26982911
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Mar;18(1):9-12
pubmed: 33822283