Diversity in German-speaking medical ethics and humanities.

Academia Austria Diversity Gender Germany Medical ethics Medical humanities Race Switzerland

Journal

Journal of bioethical inquiry
ISSN: 1872-4353
Titre abrégé: J Bioeth Inq
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101250741

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2022
Historique:
received: 21 09 2021
accepted: 19 05 2022
pubmed: 8 11 2022
medline: 11 2 2023
entrez: 7 11 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Bioethics can play an important role in addressing diversity both in and outside of academia, setting precedents for meaningful contributions to public discourse, research, teaching, training, and policy development. However, in order to do so, these conversations also need to reflect on the issue of diversity within the field of bioethics across the globe. This study aims to examine current gender representation and diversity at medical ethics and humanities institutes in Germany, the German-speaking areas of Switzerland, and Austria. A total of forty-nine medical ethics and humanities institutes from Germany (n=42), the German-speaking areas of Switzerland (n=5), and Austria (n=2) were included in the study. Institutes websites were reviewed in the first week of March 2021 and the details of each staff member listed on the website recorded. Overall, a total of 964 staff members were identified at the forty-nine German-speaking medical ethics and humanities institutes. Just over half (530/964; 55%) of all staff were female. There were significant differences between gender in some staff positions: 64.6 per cent (31/48) of directors were male (χ There has been a significant push to address gender diversity in German-speaking academia, and this study finds overall good gender parity in medical ethics and humanities institutes. However, there has not been a similar openness to discussing issues of systemic racism or how other forms of inequality affect academic diversity. Taking diversity seriously requires opening up conversations around intersectionality, including difficult conversations around race and cultural background that have long been taboo in German-speaking countries.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Bioethics can play an important role in addressing diversity both in and outside of academia, setting precedents for meaningful contributions to public discourse, research, teaching, training, and policy development. However, in order to do so, these conversations also need to reflect on the issue of diversity within the field of bioethics across the globe. This study aims to examine current gender representation and diversity at medical ethics and humanities institutes in Germany, the German-speaking areas of Switzerland, and Austria.
METHODS
A total of forty-nine medical ethics and humanities institutes from Germany (n=42), the German-speaking areas of Switzerland (n=5), and Austria (n=2) were included in the study. Institutes websites were reviewed in the first week of March 2021 and the details of each staff member listed on the website recorded.
RESULTS
Overall, a total of 964 staff members were identified at the forty-nine German-speaking medical ethics and humanities institutes. Just over half (530/964; 55%) of all staff were female. There were significant differences between gender in some staff positions: 64.6 per cent (31/48) of directors were male (χ
CONCLUSIONS
There has been a significant push to address gender diversity in German-speaking academia, and this study finds overall good gender parity in medical ethics and humanities institutes. However, there has not been a similar openness to discussing issues of systemic racism or how other forms of inequality affect academic diversity. Taking diversity seriously requires opening up conversations around intersectionality, including difficult conversations around race and cultural background that have long been taboo in German-speaking countries.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36342632
doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10215-6
pii: 10.1007/s11673-022-10215-6
pmc: PMC9908651
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

643-653

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Mar;18(1):13-22
pubmed: 33415595
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Mar;18(1):113-116
pubmed: 33415592
Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring;3(2):1-11
pubmed: 12859798
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(4):27-9
pubmed: 26982918
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(4):3-12
pubmed: 26982911
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Mar;18(1):9-12
pubmed: 33822283

Auteurs

Amelia Fiske (A)

Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Stuart McLennan (S)

Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. stuart.mclennan@tum.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH