In Multiple Myeloma, High-Risk Secondary Genetic Events Observed at Relapse Are Present From Diagnosis in Tiny, Undetectable Subclonal Populations.
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 03 2023
20 03 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
8
11
2022
medline:
21
3
2023
entrez:
7
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by copy number abnormalities (CNAs), some of which influence patient outcomes and are sometimes observed only at relapse(s), suggesting their acquisition during tumor evolution. However, the presence of micro-subclones may be missed in bulk analyses. Here, we use single-cell genomics to determine how often these high-risk events are missed at diagnosis and selected at relapse. We analyzed 81 patients with plasma cell dyscrasias using single-cell CNA sequencing. Sixty-six patients were selected at diagnosis, nine at first relapse, and six in presymptomatic stages. A total of 956 newly diagnosed patients with MM and patients with first relapse MM have been identified retrospectively with required cytogenetic data to evaluate enrichment of CNA risk events and survival impact. A total of 52,176 MM cells were analyzed. Seventy-four patients (91%) had 2-16 subclones. Among these patients, 28.7% had a subclone with high-risk features (del(17p), del(1p32), and 1q gain) at diagnosis. In a patient with a subclonal 1q gain at diagnosis, we analyzed the diagnosis, postinduction, and first relapse samples, which showed a rise of the high-risk 1q gain subclone (16%, 70%, and 92%, respectively). In our clinical database, we found that the 1q gain frequency increased from 30.2% at diagnosis to 43.6% at relapse (odds ratio, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.00). We subsequently performed survival analyses, which showed that the progression-free and overall survival curves were superimposable between patients who had the 1q gain from diagnosis and those who seemingly acquired it at relapse. This strongly suggests that many patients had 1q gains at diagnosis in microclones that were missed by bulk analyses. These data suggest that identifying these scarce aggressive cells may necessitate more aggressive treatment as early as diagnosis to prevent them from becoming the dominant clone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36343306
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01987
pmc: PMC10043564
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1695-1702Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA100707
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P01 CA155258
Pays : United States
Références
Leukemia. 2014 Mar;28(3):675-9
pubmed: 23892719
Blood. 2012 Aug 2;120(5):1060-6
pubmed: 22529291
Haematologica. 2020 Jun 05;105(9):e480-483
pubmed: 33054068
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;37(19):1657-1665
pubmed: 31091136
Blood Cancer J. 2021 Apr 29;11(4):83
pubmed: 33927196
Cancer Cell. 2014 Jan 13;25(1):91-101
pubmed: 24434212
Blood. 2021 Mar 4;137(9):1192-1195
pubmed: 33080624
Leukemia. 2019 Jan;33(1):159-170
pubmed: 29967379
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3107-3118
pubmed: 32687451
Blood Adv. 2019 Jul 9;3(13):1930-1938
pubmed: 31248884
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272
pubmed: 32015543
Leukemia. 2021 Jul;35(7):2043-2053
pubmed: 33262523
Nat Commun. 2014;5:2997
pubmed: 24429703
Nature. 2011 Mar 24;471(7339):467-72
pubmed: 21430775
BMC Genomics. 2016 Nov 7;17(1):880
pubmed: 27821060
Blood. 2019 Mar 14;133(11):1217-1221
pubmed: 30692124
Leukemia. 2005 Feb;19(2):191-4
pubmed: 15538406
Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Apr 12;12(5):335-48
pubmed: 22495321
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):1046-60
pubmed: 21410373