Non-contrast MR dacryocystography for the evaluation of epiphora and recurrent dacryocystitis: A preliminary study.


Journal

The neuroradiology journal
ISSN: 2385-1996
Titre abrégé: Neuroradiol J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101295103

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
pmc-release: 01 08 2024
medline: 19 7 2023
pubmed: 22 11 2022
entrez: 21 11 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Obstruction of the lacrimal drainage represents a common ophthalmologic issue. The blockage may interest any level of the lacrimal drainage pathway, and it is important to find the site of obstruction to plan the most appropriate treatment. In this study, findings from magnetic resonance (MR) dacryocystography were compared with findings from endoscopic and surgical procedures to evaluate the accuracy of MR dacryocystography in localizing the site of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. We enrolled twenty-one patients with clinical suspicion of nasolacrimal duct obstruction who underwent dacryoendoscopy and surgery. MR dacryocystography was performed with a heavily T2-weighted fast spin echo sequence in the coronal planes. Before the MRI was performed, a sterile 0.9% NaCl solution was administered into both conjunctival sacs. For each examination, two independent readers (with 8 and 10 years of experience in head and neck imaging) evaluated both heavily 3D space T2-weighted and STIR sequences. Stenosis/obstruction of nasolacrimal duct or lacrimal sac was diagnosed in all 21 patients who underwent MRI dacryocystography. In particular, the site of the obstruction was classified as lacrimal sac in 12 (57%) patients, nasolacrimal duct in 6 (29%) patients, and canaliculi in 3 (14%) patients by both readers. By comparison with the evidence resulting from the endoscopy, there were differences between MRI dacryocystography and dacryoendoscopy in the evaluation of the obstruction's site in three patients, with an overall accuracy of 85.7%. MR dacryocystography allows a non-invasive evaluation of the lacrimal drainage pathway, valid for the planning of the most appropriate treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36404757
doi: 10.1177/19714009221140484
pmc: PMC10588605
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

397-403

Références

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jan;33(1):141-7
pubmed: 22173761
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Feb;243(2):127-31
pubmed: 15742210
Eur Radiol. 2002 Sep;12(9):2343-8
pubmed: 12195493
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Feb;73(2):230-3
pubmed: 19062211
Br J Radiol. 1993 Mar;66(783):223-7
pubmed: 8472115
Ophthalmology. 1984 Aug;91(8):956-62
pubmed: 6093019
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Dec;165(6):1517-24
pubmed: 7484599
Neuroradiology. 1999 Mar;41(3):208-13
pubmed: 10206170
Ann Anat. 2019 Jul;224:33-40
pubmed: 30954539
Radiol Med. 2016 Jul;121(7):580-7
pubmed: 27048401
Radiol Med. 2017 Feb;122(2):123-130
pubmed: 27817053
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2013 Jun;6(2):67-74
pubmed: 24436740
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Dec;91(12):1671-4
pubmed: 17584998
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Aug;175(2):469-73
pubmed: 10915696
Eur J Radiol. 2005 Sep;55(3):331-9
pubmed: 16129243
Orbit. 2021 Feb;40(1):34-38
pubmed: 32126865
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep-Oct;40(7):749-54
pubmed: 22429759
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct;13(5):303-9
pubmed: 12218461
Emerg Radiol. 2022 Aug;29(4):769-780
pubmed: 35426003
Surv Ophthalmol. 1979 Jan-Feb;23(4):249-58
pubmed: 371047
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Feb;53(2):458-466
pubmed: 32798265
Jpn J Radiol. 2021 Mar;39(3):233-239
pubmed: 33106970
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Sep;82(9):1546-51
pubmed: 23726473
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1996 Feb;6(1):199-217
pubmed: 8919141
Radiat Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;18(6):355-62
pubmed: 11153688
Am J Ophthalmol. 1993 Jun 15;115(6):738-41
pubmed: 8506908
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Jun-Jul;21(6):1145-50
pubmed: 10871030
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan-Feb;28(1):35-9
pubmed: 22262288
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Dec;140(6):1065-1069
pubmed: 16376652
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Dec;171(6):1501-4
pubmed: 9843278
Radiol Med. 2021 Jan;126(1):47-54
pubmed: 32458271
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;47(9):1131-1137
pubmed: 31441978
Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1973 Spring;13(1):3-22
pubmed: 4724264
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Sep;10(3):185-7; discussion 188
pubmed: 7947445

Auteurs

Maurizio Cè (M)

Postgraduate School in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Elena Grimaldi (E)

Postgraduate School in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Marco Toto-Brocchi (M)

Postgraduate School in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Carlo Martinenghi (C)

Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Giancarlo Oliva (G)

Department of Radiology, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy.

Paolo Florent Felisaz (PF)

Department of Radiology, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy.

Paolo Schiavo (P)

Department of ENT Surgery, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy.

Giuseppe Lunardi (G)

Department of ENT Surgery, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy.

Michaela Cellina (M)

Department of Radiology, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH