Results of the c-TRAK TN trial: a clinical trial utilising ctDNA mutation tracking to detect molecular residual disease and trigger intervention in patients with moderate- and high-risk early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.


Journal

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2023
Historique:
received: 14 07 2022
revised: 04 11 2022
accepted: 08 11 2022
pubmed: 25 11 2022
medline: 8 2 2023
entrez: 24 11 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Post-treatment detection of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients predicts high risk of relapse. c-TRAK TN assessed the utility of prospective ctDNA surveillance in TNBC and the activity of pembrolizumab in patients with ctDNA detected [ctDNA positive (ctDNA+)]. c-TRAK TN, a multicentre phase II trial, with integrated prospective ctDNA surveillance by digital PCR, enrolled patients with early-stage TNBC and residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or stage II/III with adjuvant chemotherapy. ctDNA surveillance comprised three-monthly blood sampling to 12 months (18 months if samples were missed due to coronavirus disease), and ctDNA+ patients were randomised 2 : 1 to intervention : observation. ctDNA results were blinded unless patients were allocated to intervention, when staging scans were done and those free of recurrence were offered pembrolizumab. A protocol amendment (16 September 2020) closed the observation group; all subsequent ctDNA+ patients were allocated to intervention. Co-primary endpoints were (i) ctDNA detection rate and (ii) sustained ctDNA clearance rate on pembrolizumab (NCT03145961). Two hundred and eight patients registered between 30 January 2018 and 06 December 2019, 185 had tumour sequenced, 171 (92.4%) had trackable mutations, and 161 entered ctDNA surveillance. Rate of ctDNA detection by 12 months was 27.3% (44/161, 95% confidence interval 20.6% to 34.9%). Seven patients relapsed without prior ctDNA detection. Forty-five patients entered the therapeutic component (intervention n = 31; observation n = 14; one observation patient was re-allocated to intervention following protocol amendment). Of patients allocated to intervention, 72% (23/32) had metastases on staging at the time of ctDNA+, and 4 patients declined pembrolizumab. Of the five patients who commenced pembrolizumab, none achieved sustained ctDNA clearance. c-TRAK TN is the first prospective study to assess whether ctDNA assays have clinical utility in guiding therapy in TNBC. Patients had a high rate of metastatic disease on ctDNA detection. Findings have implications for future trial design, emphasising the importance of commencing ctDNA testing early, with more sensitive and/or frequent ctDNA testing regimes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Post-treatment detection of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients predicts high risk of relapse. c-TRAK TN assessed the utility of prospective ctDNA surveillance in TNBC and the activity of pembrolizumab in patients with ctDNA detected [ctDNA positive (ctDNA+)].
PATIENTS AND METHODS
c-TRAK TN, a multicentre phase II trial, with integrated prospective ctDNA surveillance by digital PCR, enrolled patients with early-stage TNBC and residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or stage II/III with adjuvant chemotherapy. ctDNA surveillance comprised three-monthly blood sampling to 12 months (18 months if samples were missed due to coronavirus disease), and ctDNA+ patients were randomised 2 : 1 to intervention : observation. ctDNA results were blinded unless patients were allocated to intervention, when staging scans were done and those free of recurrence were offered pembrolizumab. A protocol amendment (16 September 2020) closed the observation group; all subsequent ctDNA+ patients were allocated to intervention. Co-primary endpoints were (i) ctDNA detection rate and (ii) sustained ctDNA clearance rate on pembrolizumab (NCT03145961).
RESULTS
Two hundred and eight patients registered between 30 January 2018 and 06 December 2019, 185 had tumour sequenced, 171 (92.4%) had trackable mutations, and 161 entered ctDNA surveillance. Rate of ctDNA detection by 12 months was 27.3% (44/161, 95% confidence interval 20.6% to 34.9%). Seven patients relapsed without prior ctDNA detection. Forty-five patients entered the therapeutic component (intervention n = 31; observation n = 14; one observation patient was re-allocated to intervention following protocol amendment). Of patients allocated to intervention, 72% (23/32) had metastases on staging at the time of ctDNA+, and 4 patients declined pembrolizumab. Of the five patients who commenced pembrolizumab, none achieved sustained ctDNA clearance.
CONCLUSIONS
c-TRAK TN is the first prospective study to assess whether ctDNA assays have clinical utility in guiding therapy in TNBC. Patients had a high rate of metastatic disease on ctDNA detection. Findings have implications for future trial design, emphasising the importance of commencing ctDNA testing early, with more sensitive and/or frequent ctDNA testing regimes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36423745
pii: S0923-7534(22)04735-4
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.11.005
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
pembrolizumab DPT0O3T46P
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological 0
Circulating Tumor DNA 0

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03145961']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

200-211

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : CRUKE/16/024
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1491/A15955
Pays : United Kingdom

Investigateurs

None S Chan
A Armstrong (A)
F Raja (F)
P Schmid (P)
A Tutt (A)
R Roux (R)
S Cleator (S)

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

N C Turner (NC)

Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. Electronic address: Nick.Turner@icr.ac.uk.

C Swift (C)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.

B Jenkins (B)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

L Kilburn (L)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

M Coakley (M)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.

M Beaney (M)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

L Fox (L)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

K Goddard (K)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

I Garcia-Murillas (I)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

P Proszek (P)

NIHR Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.

P Hall (P)

University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

C Harper-Wynne (C)

Maidstone Hospital, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, UK.

T Hickish (T)

University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK.

S Kernaghan (S)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

I R Macpherson (IR)

The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.

A F C Okines (AFC)

Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.

C Palmieri (C)

Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Trust, Liverpool, Wirral, UK.

S Perry (S)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

K Randle (K)

Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK.

C Snowdon (C)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

H Stobart (H)

Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK.

A M Wardley (AM)

Outreach Research & Innovation Group Ltd, Manchester, UK.

D Wheatley (D)

Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK.

S Waters (S)

Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK.

M C Winter (MC)

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

M Hubank (M)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.

S D Allen (SD)

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.

J M Bliss (JM)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH