Geometrical congruence, greedy navigability and myopic transfer in complex networks and brain connectomes.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 11 2022
27 11 2022
Historique:
received:
06
07
2020
accepted:
01
11
2022
entrez:
27
11
2022
pubmed:
28
11
2022
medline:
30
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We introduce in network geometry a measure of geometrical congruence (GC) to evaluate the extent a network topology follows an underlying geometry. This requires finding all topological shortest-paths for each nonadjacent node pair in the network: a nontrivial computational task. Hence, we propose an optimized algorithm that reduces 26 years of worst scenario computation to one week parallel computing. Analysing artificial networks with patent geometry we discover that, different from current belief, hyperbolic networks do not show in general high GC and efficient greedy navigability (GN) with respect to the geodesics. The myopic transfer which rules GN works best only when degree-distribution power-law exponent is strictly close to two. Analysing real networks-whose geometry is often latent-GC overcomes GN as marker to differentiate phenotypical states in macroscale structural-MRI brain connectomes, suggesting connectomes might have a latent neurobiological geometry accounting for more information than the visible tridimensional Euclidean.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36437254
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34634-6
pii: 10.1038/s41467-022-34634-6
pmc: PMC9701786
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7308Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 26;12(1):1926
pubmed: 33771992
Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 5;11(1):2849
pubmed: 32503974
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 20;8(1):1615
pubmed: 29151574
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 Sep;82(3 Pt 2):036106
pubmed: 21230138
Nature. 2012 Sep 27;489(7417):537-40
pubmed: 22972194
Phys Rev Lett. 2003 Feb 7;90(5):058701
pubmed: 12633404
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 29;116(5):1468-1469
pubmed: 30630863
Nature. 2000 Aug 24;406(6798):845
pubmed: 10972276
BMC Neurosci. 2008 Apr 10;9:36
pubmed: 18402664
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 12;115(24):6297-6302
pubmed: 29848631
Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Feb 6;102(5):058701
pubmed: 19257567
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1613
pubmed: 23563395
Front Neurosci. 2012 Oct 16;6:152
pubmed: 23087608
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):20244-20253
pubmed: 32759211
Science. 1999 Oct 15;286(5439):509-12
pubmed: 10521342
Brief Bioinform. 2018 Nov 27;19(6):1183-1202
pubmed: 28453640
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019 Oct;58:101-104
pubmed: 31476550
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 25;8(1):15760
pubmed: 30361555
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 29;8(1):12997
pubmed: 30158553
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Apr 13;13(5):336-49
pubmed: 22498897
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 04;10(3):e0118432
pubmed: 25738806
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 12;118(2):
pubmed: 33380456
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Sep;106(3):1125-65
pubmed: 21653723