Benefit of extending the protocol for high resolution manometry according to the version 4.0 of the Chicago criteria. A multicenter study.
Chicago 3.0
Chicago 4.0
esophageal motility disorders
high resolution esophageal motility
Journal
Neurogastroenterology and motility
ISSN: 1365-2982
Titre abrégé: Neurogastroenterol Motil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9432572
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
revised:
02
11
2022
received:
19
09
2022
accepted:
09
11
2022
pubmed:
30
11
2022
medline:
3
3
2023
entrez:
29
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The last version of the Chicago Criteria for high resolution esophageal manometry proposes an expanded protocol including complementary maneuvers to improve the diagnostic yield of the exploration. Our aim was to determine the diagnostic gain of the CCv4.0 protocol compared to the CCv3.0 protocol. All manometry recordings performed in 4 reference centers during the first 10 months after the implementation of the new protocol were retrospectively reviewed. The time spent to complete the protocol was measured, and the changes in diagnosis resulting from the new CCv4.0 were compared to CCv3.0. From a total of 756 HRM performed, 606 studies could be properly analyzed. The duration of the studies was 18.3 ± 4.3 min. From these, 11.3 ± 3.4 min were spent to complete the CCv3.0 protocol, and 7.4 ± 3.6 min were spent for the remaining maneuvers. A discordant diagnosis between CCv3.0 and CCv4.0 was obtained in 12% of patients: 32% of patients with ineffective esophageal motility turned to normal motility; 24% of patients with esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction (EGJOO) turned to a non-obstructive disorder; and 1% of patients with an apparently normal EGJ relaxation, turned to an obstructive disorder. EGJOO according to CCv4.0 was more prevalent in patients referred for dysphagia (11%) than those referred for GERD (4%; p = 0.003). Prolongation of the time spent to complete the CCv4.0 protocol leads to a change in the diagnosis of 12% of patients. Clinically relevant changes are mainly related to the evaluation of EGJOO.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The last version of the Chicago Criteria for high resolution esophageal manometry proposes an expanded protocol including complementary maneuvers to improve the diagnostic yield of the exploration. Our aim was to determine the diagnostic gain of the CCv4.0 protocol compared to the CCv3.0 protocol.
METHODS
All manometry recordings performed in 4 reference centers during the first 10 months after the implementation of the new protocol were retrospectively reviewed. The time spent to complete the protocol was measured, and the changes in diagnosis resulting from the new CCv4.0 were compared to CCv3.0.
KEY RESULTS
From a total of 756 HRM performed, 606 studies could be properly analyzed. The duration of the studies was 18.3 ± 4.3 min. From these, 11.3 ± 3.4 min were spent to complete the CCv3.0 protocol, and 7.4 ± 3.6 min were spent for the remaining maneuvers. A discordant diagnosis between CCv3.0 and CCv4.0 was obtained in 12% of patients: 32% of patients with ineffective esophageal motility turned to normal motility; 24% of patients with esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction (EGJOO) turned to a non-obstructive disorder; and 1% of patients with an apparently normal EGJ relaxation, turned to an obstructive disorder. EGJOO according to CCv4.0 was more prevalent in patients referred for dysphagia (11%) than those referred for GERD (4%; p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES
Prolongation of the time spent to complete the CCv4.0 protocol leads to a change in the diagnosis of 12% of patients. Clinically relevant changes are mainly related to the evaluation of EGJOO.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14503Informations de copyright
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Spechler SJ, Castell DO. Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut. 2001;49(1):145-151.
Wang K, Duan LP, Ge Y, Xia ZW, Xu ZJ. A comparative study of 22-channel water-perfusion system and solid-state system with 36-sensors in esophageal manometery. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12:1-8.
Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago classification. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42(5):627-635.
Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(SUPPL 1):57-65.
Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil [Internet]. 2015;27(2):160-174. doi:10.1111/nmo.12477
Okeke FC, Raja S, Lynch KL, et al. What is the clinical significance of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction? Evaluation of 60 patients at a tertiary referral center. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(6):1-6.
Pérez-Fernández MT, Santander C, Marinero A, Burgos-Santamaría D, Chavarría-Herbozo C. Characterization and follow-up of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction detected by high resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(1):116-126.
Misselwitz B, Hollenstein M, Bütikofer S, Ang D, Heinrich H, Fox M. Prospective serial diagnostic study: the effects of position and provocative tests on the diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorders by high-resolution manometry. Aliment Pharmacol Ther [Internet]. 2020;51(7):706-718.
Marin I, Serra J. Patterns of esophageal pressure responses to a rapid drink challenge test in patients with esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil [Internet]. 2016;28(4):543-553. doi:10.1111/nmo.12749
Carlson DA, Roman S. Esophageal provocation tests: are they useful to improve diagnostic yield of high resolution manometry? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(4):e13321.
Hasak S, Brunt LM, Wang D, Gyawali CP. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with Postfundoplication dysphagia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(10):1982-1990.
Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, et al. Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(1):e14058.
Marin I, Cisternas D, Abrao L, et al. Normal values of esophageal pressure responses to a rapid drink challenge test in healthy subjects: results of a multicenter study. Neurogastroenterol Motil [Internet]. 2017;29:e13021. doi:10.1111/nmo.13021
Marin I, Caballero N, Guarner-Argente C, Serra J. Rapid drink challenge test for the clinical evaluation of patients with achalasia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(10):e13438.
Bredenoord AJ, Babaei A, Carlson D, et al. Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(9):1-13.
Lynch KL, Yang YX, Metz DC, Falk GW. Clinical presentation and disease course of patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(6):1-6.
Patcharatrakul T, Alkaddour A, Pitisuttithum P, et al. How to approach esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020;1481(1):210-223.
van Hoeij FB, Smout AJPM, Bredenoord AJ. Characterization of idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil [Internet]. 2015;27(9):1310-1316.
Visaggi P, Ghisa M, del Corso G, et al. Chicago classification v4.0 protocol improves specificity and accuracy of diagnosis of oesophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022;56(4):606-613.
Zerbib F, Luna D, Marin I, Serra J. The added value of symptom analysis during a rapid drink challenge in high-resolution esophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil [Internet]. 2021;33:e14008.
Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, Roman S, Boris L, Carlson D, Pandolfino JE. Refining the criterion for an abnormal integrated relaxation pressure in esophageal pressure topography based on the pattern of esophageal contractility using a classification and regression tree model. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(8):356-363.
Kim JY, Min YW. Peroral endoscopic Myotomy for esophageal motility disorders. Clin Endosc [Internet]. 2020;53(6):638-645.
Wang YT, Tai LF, Yazaki E, et al. Investigation of dysphagia after antireflux surgery by high resolution manometry: impact of multiple water swallows and a solid test meal on diagnosis, management and clinical outcome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2015;13(9):1575-1583.
Ang D, Misselwitz B, Hollenstein M, et al. Diagnostic yield of high-resolution manometry with a solid test meal for clinically relevant, symptomatic oesophageal motility disorders: serial diagnostic study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(9):654-661.
Rogers BD, Gyawali CP. Enhancing high-resolution esophageal manometry: use of ancillary techniques and maneuvers. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2020;49(3):411-426.