T1w/FLAIR ratio standardization as a myelin marker in MS patients.
Image calibration
Integrity
Multiple sclerosis
T1w/FLAIR ratio
T1w/T2w ratio
Journal
NeuroImage. Clinical
ISSN: 2213-1582
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage Clin
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101597070
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
30
03
2022
revised:
20
10
2022
accepted:
23
10
2022
pubmed:
2
12
2022
medline:
15
12
2022
entrez:
1
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Calculation of a T1w/T2w ratio was introduced as a proxy for myelin integrity in the brain of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Since nowadays 3D FLAIR is commonly used for lesion detection instead of T2w images, we introduce a T1w/FLAIR ratio as an alternative for the T1w/T2w ratio. Bias and intensity variation are widely present between different scanners, between subjects and within subjects over time in T1w, T2w and FLAIR images. We present a standardized method for calculating a histogram calibrated T1w/FLAIR ratio to reduce bias and intensity variation in MR sequences from different scanners and at different time-points. 207 Relapsing Remitting MS patients were scanned on 4 different 3 T scanners with a protocol including 3D T1w, 2D T2w and 3D FLAIR images. After bias correction, T1w/FLAIR ratio maps and T1w/T2w ratio maps were calculated in 4 different ways: without calibration, with linear histogram calibration as described by Ganzetti et al. (2014), and by using 2 methods of non-linear histogram calibration. The first nonlinear calibration uses a template of extra-cerebral tissue and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) brought from Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space to subject space; for the second nonlinear method we used an extra-cerebral tissue and CSF template of our own subjects. Additionally, we segmented several brain structures such as Normal Appearing White Matter (NAWM), Normal Appearing Grey Matter (NAGM), corpus callosum, thalami and MS lesions using Freesurfer and Samseg. The coefficient of variation of T1w/FLAIR ratio in NAWM for the no calibrated, linear, and 2 nonlinear calibration methods were respectively 24, 19.1, 9.5, 13.8. The nonlinear methods of calibration showed the best results for calculating the T1w/FLAIR ratio with a smaller dispersion of the data and a smaller overlap of T1w/FLAIR ratio in the different segmented brain structures. T1w/T2w and T1w/FLAIR ratios showed a wider range of values compared to MTR values. Calibration of T1w/T2w and T1w/FLAIR ratio maps is imperative to account for the sources of variation described above. The nonlinear calibration methods showed the best reduction of between-subject and within-subject variability. The T1w/T2w and T1w/FLAIR ratio seem to be more sensitive to smaller changes in tissue integrity than MTR. Future work is needed to determine the exact substrate of T1w/FLAIR ratio and to obtain correlations with clinical outcome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36451354
pii: S2213-1582(22)00313-8
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103248
pmc: PMC9668645
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103248Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 12;8(1):10554
pubmed: 30002497
Ann Neurol. 2017 Oct;82(4):635-639
pubmed: 28833377
Neuroimage Clin. 2021;32:102798
pubmed: 34450507
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 15;225:117471
pubmed: 33099007
Brain. 2009 May;132(Pt 5):1175-89
pubmed: 19339255
Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 15;202:116137
pubmed: 31473352
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Dec 1;40(17):4952-4964
pubmed: 31403237
J Neurol. 2003 Nov;250(11):1293-301
pubmed: 14648144
NMR Biomed. 2018 Mar;31(3):
pubmed: 29315894
Neuroimage. 2016 Dec;143:235-249
pubmed: 27612647
Brain. 2010 Mar;133(Pt 3):858-67
pubmed: 20123726
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:473-85
pubmed: 25449739
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 1;219:117012
pubmed: 32526386
Ann Neurol. 2017 Oct;82(4):519-529
pubmed: 28833433
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 15;11(1):1573
pubmed: 33452402
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;92(7):790-792
pubmed: 33436500
J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 10;31(32):11597-616
pubmed: 21832190
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Aug;20(8):653-670
pubmed: 34139157
Ann Neurol. 2017 Oct;82(4):516-518
pubmed: 28976603
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Apr;38(4):1780-1790
pubmed: 28009069
J Neurol. 2016 Aug;263(8):1495-502
pubmed: 27178000
Sci Data. 2016 Jun 21;3:160044
pubmed: 27326542
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Mar;41(3):461-463
pubmed: 32139431
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;93(7):741-752
pubmed: 35580993
Neurology. 2001 Feb 13;56(3):304-11
pubmed: 11171893
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 02;8:671
pubmed: 25228871
Magn Reson Med. 2010 Apr;63(4):902-9
pubmed: 20373391
Brain. 2021 Jul 28;144(6):1684-1696
pubmed: 33693571
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Sep;46(3):690-696
pubmed: 28019046