Differentiation of central disorders of hypersomnolence with manual and artificial-intelligence-derived polysomnographic measures.

computerized analysis excessive daytime sleepiness hypersomnia machine learning sleep instability

Journal

Sleep
ISSN: 1550-9109
Titre abrégé: Sleep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7809084

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 02 2023
Historique:
received: 20 04 2022
revised: 14 11 2022
pubmed: 2 12 2022
medline: 10 2 2023
entrez: 1 12 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Differentiation of central disorders of hypersomnolence (DOH) is challenging but important for patient care. This study aimed to investigate whether biomarkers derived from sleep structure evaluated both by manual scoring as well as with artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms allow distinction of patients with different DOH. We included video-polysomnography data of 40 narcolepsy type 1 (NT1), 26 narcolepsy type 2 (NT2), 23 patients with idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) and 54 participants with subjective excessive daytime sleepiness (sEDS). Sleep experts manually scored sleep stages. A previously validated AI algorithm was employed to obtain automatic hypnograms and hypnodensity graphs (where each epoch is represented as a mixture of sleep stage probabilities). One-thousand-three features describing sleep architecture and instability were extracted from manual/automatic hypnogram and hypnodensity graphs. After feature selection, random forest classifiers were trained and tested in a 5-fold-cross-validation scheme to distinguish groups pairwise (NT1-vs-NT2, NT1-vs-IH, …) and single groups from the pooled remaining ones (NT1-vs-rest, NT2-vs-rest,…). The accuracy/F1-score values obtained in the test sets were: 0.74 ± 0.04/0.79 ± 0.05 (NT1-vs-NT2), 0.89 ± 0.09/0.91 ± 0.08 (NT1-vs-IH), 0.93 ± 0.06/0.91 ± 0.07 (NT1-vs-sEDS), 0.88 ± 0.04/0.80 ± 0.07 (NT1-vs-rest), 0.65 ± 0.10/0.70 ± 0.09 (NT2-vs-IH), 0.72 ± 0.12/0.60 ± 0.10 (NT2-vs-sEDS), 0.54 ± 0.19/0.38 ± 0.13 (NT2-vs-rest), 0.57 ± 0.11/0.35 ± 0.18 (IH-vs-sEDS), 0.71 ± 0.08/0.35 ± 0.10 (IH-vs-rest) and 0.76 ± 0.08/0.71 ± 0.13 (sEDS-vs-rest). The results confirm previous findings on sleep instability in patients with NT1 and show that combining manual and automatic AI-based sleep analysis could be useful for better distinction of NT2 from IH, but no precise sleep biomarker of NT2 or IH could be identified. Validation in a larger and multi-centric cohort is needed to confirm these findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36455881
pii: 6862127
doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsac288
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Matteo Cesari (M)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Kristin Egger (K)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Ambra Stefani (A)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Melanie Bergmann (M)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Abubaker Ibrahim (A)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Elisabeth Brandauer (E)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Birgit Högl (B)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Anna Heidbreder (A)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH