Descriptive DNA barcoding of Argas (Persicargas) arboreus and Argas (Persicargas) persicus ticks (Ixodida: Argasidae) infesting birds in Egypt.
Argas
COI
DNA barcoding
Egypt
Journal
Experimental & applied acarology
ISSN: 1572-9702
Titre abrégé: Exp Appl Acarol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8507436
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
28
09
2022
accepted:
26
11
2022
pubmed:
3
12
2022
medline:
15
12
2022
entrez:
2
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Argas ticks are primary parasites of birds with veterinary importance. Nevertheless, these ticks have received little attention regarding molecular identification studies. DNA barcoding is a powerful technique for identifying tick species besides traditional morphological identification. The present work is a first effort to divulge DNA sequences of Argas (Persicargas) arboreus from Egypt and worldwide. We used cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) from A. arboreus infesting herons, and from the fowl tick Argas (Persicargas) persicus. Our results pointed out another success for the Folmer primers that are widely used in DNA barcoding, permitting the discrimination of morphologically similar A. arboreus and A. persicus.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36459311
doi: 10.1007/s10493-022-00768-x
pii: 10.1007/s10493-022-00768-x
pmc: PMC9732060
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
397-406Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Med Entomol. 1974 Nov 25;11(5):513-24
pubmed: 4455914
Mol Ecol Resour. 2012 May;12(3):377-88
pubmed: 22356472
Rev Sci Tech. 1994 Dec;13(4):1201-26
pubmed: 7711310
Vet World. 2016 Oct;9(10):1087-1101
pubmed: 27847418
Int J Parasitol. 1980 Aug;10(4):253-9
pubmed: 7451018
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Mar 15;32(6):897-928
pubmed: 11247714
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014 Apr;5(3):352-8
pubmed: 24656809
Korean J Parasitol. 2018 Dec;56(6):583-588
pubmed: 30630279
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2003 Dec;70(4):325-30
pubmed: 14971735
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 29;360(1462):1825-34
pubmed: 16214741
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Mar 29;8:637837
pubmed: 33855055
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1966 Jan;15(1):76-86
pubmed: 5901633
Genome. 2017 Jan;60(1):74-84
pubmed: 27918193
Mol Biol Evol. 2021 Jun 25;38(7):3022-3027
pubmed: 33892491
Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994 Oct;3(5):294-9
pubmed: 7881515
Annu Rev Entomol. 1966;11:261-308
pubmed: 5321578
Bioessays. 2007 Feb;29(2):188-97
pubmed: 17226815
J Med Entomol. 1971 Oct 30;8(4):407-14
pubmed: 5159255
Front Biosci. 2008 May 01;13:6938-46
pubmed: 18508706
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018 Jan;9(1):44-56
pubmed: 29055643
Adv Parasitol. 1985;24:135-238
pubmed: 3904345
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014 Mar;5(2):213-8
pubmed: 24355764
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463-7
pubmed: 271968
Parasit Vectors. 2014 Mar 03;7:93
pubmed: 24589289
J Comput Biol. 2000 Feb-Apr;7(1-2):203-14
pubmed: 10890397
J Vector Borne Dis. 2007 Jun;44(2):79-89
pubmed: 17722860
Mol Ecol Notes. 2007 May 1;7(3):355-364
pubmed: 18784790
Int J Parasitol. 2007 Oct;37(12):1297-305
pubmed: 17624352
Mitochondrial DNA. 2014 Apr;25(2):142-9
pubmed: 23631370
Trends Parasitol. 2003 Dec;19(12):545-6
pubmed: 14642760
J Med Entomol. 1975 Jun 30;12(2):194-201
pubmed: 1159742
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019 Jan;10(1):219-240
pubmed: 30309738