Strong Start Innovation: Equitable Outcomes Across Public and Privately Insured Clients Receiving Birth Center Care.


Journal

Journal of midwifery & women's health
ISSN: 1542-2011
Titre abrégé: J Midwifery Womens Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100909407

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2022
Historique:
revised: 15 10 2022
received: 28 02 2022
accepted: 19 10 2022
pubmed: 9 12 2022
medline: 21 12 2022
entrez: 8 12 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Birth Center model of care is a health care delivery innovation in its fourth decade of demonstration across the United States. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the model's potential for decreasing poverty-related health disparities among childbearing families. Between 2013 and 2017, 26,259 childbearing people received care within the 45 Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Strong Start birth center sites. Secondary analysis of the prospective American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry was conducted. Descriptive statistics described sociobehavioral, medical risk factors, and core clinical outcomes to inform the logistic regression model. Privately insured consumers were independently compared with 2 subgroups of Medicaid beneficiaries: Strong Start enrollees (midwifery-led care with peer counselors) and non-Strong Start Medicaid beneficiaries (midwifery-led care without peer counselors). After controlling for medical risk factors, Strong Start Medicaid beneficiaries achieved similar outcomes to privately insured consumers with no significant differences in maternal or newborn outcomes between groups. Perinatal outcomes included induction of labor (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.86; 95% CI 0.61-1.13), epidural analgesia use (aOR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.68-1.48), cesarean birth (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.87-1.53), exclusive breastfeeding on discharge (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.48-2.56), low Apgar score at 5 minutes (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.86-1.83), low birth weight (aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.77-1.64), and antepartum transfer of care after the first prenatal appointment (aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.97-2.40). Medicaid beneficiaries who were not enrolled in the Strong Start midwifery-led, peer counselor program demonstrated similar results except for having higher epidural analgesia use (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.10-1.53) and significantly lower exclusive breastfeeding on discharge (aOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.40-0.81) than their privately insured counterparts. The midwifery-led birth center model of care complemented by peer counselors demonstrated a pathway to achieve health equity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36480161
doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13439
pmc: PMC10107204
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

746-752

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Nurse Midwives (ACNM).

Références

Health Care Women Int. 1999 Mar-Apr;20(2):111-26
pubmed: 10409982
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013670
pubmed: 28213600
J Perinat Educ. 2016;25(3):145-149
pubmed: 30538411
Breastfeed Med. 2018 May;13(4):286-291
pubmed: 29634340
Birth. 2016 Jun;43(2):97-9
pubmed: 27160375
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2020 Jan/Mar;34(1):27-37
pubmed: 31996642
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Apr;33(8):1427-1433
pubmed: 30182768
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 01;9(12):e93456
pubmed: 25437212
Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):e113-21
pubmed: 23409910
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jun;39(6):1042-1050
pubmed: 32479222
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010 Jan-Feb;55(1):1
pubmed: 20129222
N Engl J Med. 1989 Dec 28;321(26):1804-11
pubmed: 2687692
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019 Sep;64(5):598-603
pubmed: 31379090
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011 Sep-Oct;56(5):452-60
pubmed: 23181642
Birth. 2019 Jun;46(2):244-252
pubmed: 31087393
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2022 Apr-Jun 01;36(2):150-160
pubmed: 35476769
Birth. 2020 Mar;47(1):3-7
pubmed: 31630454
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019 Sep;64(5):592-597
pubmed: 31373434
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;35(1):24-33
pubmed: 33496995
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;58(1):3-14
pubmed: 23363029
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1091-1113
pubmed: 32930433
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;58(4):378-82
pubmed: 23837663
J Perinat Educ. 2014 Winter;23(1):17-24
pubmed: 24453464

Auteurs

Diana Jolles (D)

Frontier Nursing University, Versailles, Kentucky.

Lauren Hoehn-Velasco (L)

Department of Economics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Lisa Ross (L)

American Association of Birth Centers, Perkiomenville, Pennsylvania.

Susan Stapleton (S)

American Association of Birth Centers, Perkiomenville, Pennsylvania.

Jennie Joseph (J)

Commonsense Childbirth, Winter Garden, Florida.

Jill Alliman (J)

Frontier Nursing University, Versailles, Kentucky.

Kate Bauer (K)

American Association of Birth Centers, Perkiomenville, Pennsylvania.

Ebony Marcelle (E)

Midwifery Melanated, LLC, Washington, District of Columbia.

Jennifer Wright (J)

American Association of Birth Centers, Perkiomenville, Pennsylvania.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH