Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student experiences during rural placements in Australia: findings from a national multi-centre survey.
COVID-19 pandemic
Clinical placements
Medical education
Rural placements
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Dec 2022
09 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
20
04
2022
accepted:
28
11
2022
entrez:
9
12
2022
pubmed:
10
12
2022
medline:
15
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this national study was to explore the learning experiences of Australia's medical students who trained rurally during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. A cross-sectional, national multi-centre survey was conducted in 2020, through the Federation of Rural Australian Medical Educators (FRAME). Participants were medical students who had completed an extended Rural Clinical School (RCS) training placement (≥ 12 months). A bespoke set of COVID-19 impact questions were incorporated into the annual FRAME survey, to capture COVID-19-related student experiences in 2020. Pre-pandemic (2019 FRAME survey data) comparisons were also explored. FRAME survey data were obtained from 464 students in 2020 (51.7% response rate), compared with available data from 668 students in 2019 (75.6% response rate). Most students expressed concern regarding the pandemic's impact on the quality of their learning (80%) or missed clinical learning (58%); however, students reported being well-supported by the various learning and support strategies implemented by the RCSs across Australia. Notably, comparisons to pre-pandemic (2019) participants of the general RCS experience found higher levels of student support (strongly agree 58.9% vs 42.4%, p < 0.001) and wellbeing (strongly agree 49.6% vs 42.4%, p = 0.008) amongst the 2020 participants. Students with more than one year of RCS experience compared to one RCS year felt better supported with clinical skills learning opportunities (p = 0.015) and less affected by COVID-19 in their exam performance (p = 0.009). This study has provided evidence of both the level of concern relating to learning quality as well as the positive impact of the various learning and support strategies implemented by the RCSs during the pandemic in 2020. RCSs should further evaluate the strategies implemented to identify those that are worth sustaining into the post-pandemic period.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The aim of this national study was to explore the learning experiences of Australia's medical students who trained rurally during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.
METHODS
METHODS
A cross-sectional, national multi-centre survey was conducted in 2020, through the Federation of Rural Australian Medical Educators (FRAME). Participants were medical students who had completed an extended Rural Clinical School (RCS) training placement (≥ 12 months). A bespoke set of COVID-19 impact questions were incorporated into the annual FRAME survey, to capture COVID-19-related student experiences in 2020. Pre-pandemic (2019 FRAME survey data) comparisons were also explored.
RESULTS
RESULTS
FRAME survey data were obtained from 464 students in 2020 (51.7% response rate), compared with available data from 668 students in 2019 (75.6% response rate). Most students expressed concern regarding the pandemic's impact on the quality of their learning (80%) or missed clinical learning (58%); however, students reported being well-supported by the various learning and support strategies implemented by the RCSs across Australia. Notably, comparisons to pre-pandemic (2019) participants of the general RCS experience found higher levels of student support (strongly agree 58.9% vs 42.4%, p < 0.001) and wellbeing (strongly agree 49.6% vs 42.4%, p = 0.008) amongst the 2020 participants. Students with more than one year of RCS experience compared to one RCS year felt better supported with clinical skills learning opportunities (p = 0.015) and less affected by COVID-19 in their exam performance (p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study has provided evidence of both the level of concern relating to learning quality as well as the positive impact of the various learning and support strategies implemented by the RCSs during the pandemic in 2020. RCSs should further evaluate the strategies implemented to identify those that are worth sustaining into the post-pandemic period.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36482397
doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03927-1
pii: 10.1186/s12909-022-03927-1
pmc: PMC9733068
doi:
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
852Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Rural Remote Health. 2019 Mar;19(1):4971
pubmed: 30827118
Med Educ. 2020 Aug;54(8):765-766
pubmed: 32344447
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):777-778
pubmed: 32213335
BMJ. 2021 Oct 18;375:n2287
pubmed: 34663569
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):14
pubmed: 33407422
Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Oct;48:102892
pubmed: 32980557
Med Educ. 2020 Dec;54(12):1184-1185
pubmed: 32531804
Med J Aust. 2020 Oct;213(7):334-334.e1
pubmed: 32893343
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jun 22;21(1):352
pubmed: 34158036
Med Educ. 2020 Apr;54(4):364-374
pubmed: 32227376
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Nov 2;21(1):560
pubmed: 34727904
HEC Forum. 2021 Jun;33(1-2):125-142
pubmed: 33481144
Acad Med. 2021 Sep 1;96(9):1276-1281
pubmed: 34432665
J R Soc Med. 2021 Mar;114(3):113-116
pubmed: 33460334
Med Teach. 2020 Jul;42(7):762-771
pubmed: 32401085
Med Educ. 2020 Oct;54(10):951-952
pubmed: 32392354
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 17;9(2):
pubmed: 33671392
Med Teach. 2020 Jul;42(7):787-790
pubmed: 32468890
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Jun;25(12):4426-4434
pubmed: 34227080
Med Educ. 2021 Jan;55(1):125-127
pubmed: 32931595
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1764740
pubmed: 32400298
Med J Aust. 2015 Jan 19;202(1):41-5
pubmed: 25588445
Acad Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;45(5):575-580
pubmed: 34018165