Nuclear import receptors are recruited by FG-nucleoporins to rescue hallmarks of TDP-43 proteinopathy.
Aggregation
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Drosophila
Frontotemporal dementia
Importin
Nuclear pore
Nucleocytoplasmic transport
Prion-like domain
TDP-43
Journal
Molecular neurodegeneration
ISSN: 1750-1326
Titre abrégé: Mol Neurodegener
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101266600
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 12 2022
08 12 2022
Historique:
received:
09
11
2022
accepted:
23
11
2022
entrez:
9
12
2022
pubmed:
10
12
2022
medline:
15
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cytoplasmic mislocalization and aggregation of TAR DNA-binding protein-43 (TDP-43) is a hallmark of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia (ALS/FTD) disease spectrum, causing both nuclear loss-of-function and cytoplasmic toxic gain-of-function phenotypes. While TDP-43 proteinopathy has been associated with defects in nucleocytoplasmic transport, this process is still poorly understood. Here we study the role of karyopherin-β1 (KPNB1) and other nuclear import receptors in regulating TDP-43 pathology. We used immunostaining, immunoprecipitation, biochemical and toxicity assays in cell lines, primary neuron and organotypic mouse brain slice cultures, to determine the impact of KPNB1 on the solubility, localization, and toxicity of pathological TDP-43 constructs. Postmortem patient brain and spinal cord tissue was stained to assess KPNB1 colocalization with TDP-43 inclusions. Turbidity assays were employed to study the dissolution and prevention of aggregation of recombinant TDP-43 fibrils in vitro. Fly models of TDP-43 proteinopathy were used to determine the effect of KPNB1 on their neurodegenerative phenotype in vivo. We discovered that several members of the nuclear import receptor protein family can reduce the formation of pathological TDP-43 aggregates. Using KPNB1 as a model, we found that its activity depends on the prion-like C-terminal region of TDP-43, which mediates the co-aggregation with phenylalanine and glycine-rich nucleoporins (FG-Nups) such as Nup62. KPNB1 is recruited into these co-aggregates where it acts as a molecular chaperone that reverses aberrant phase transition of Nup62 and TDP-43. These findings are supported by the discovery that Nup62 and KPNB1 are also sequestered into pathological TDP-43 aggregates in ALS/FTD postmortem CNS tissue, and by the identification of the fly ortholog of KPNB1 as a strong protective modifier in Drosophila models of TDP-43 proteinopathy. Our results show that KPNB1 can rescue all hallmarks of TDP-43 pathology, by restoring its solubility and nuclear localization, and reducing neurodegeneration in cellular and animal models of ALS/FTD. Our findings suggest a novel NLS-independent mechanism where, analogous to its canonical role in dissolving the diffusion barrier formed by FG-Nups in the nuclear pore, KPNB1 is recruited into TDP-43/FG-Nup co-aggregates present in TDP-43 proteinopathies and therapeutically reverses their deleterious phase transition and mislocalization, mitigating neurodegeneration.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cytoplasmic mislocalization and aggregation of TAR DNA-binding protein-43 (TDP-43) is a hallmark of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia (ALS/FTD) disease spectrum, causing both nuclear loss-of-function and cytoplasmic toxic gain-of-function phenotypes. While TDP-43 proteinopathy has been associated with defects in nucleocytoplasmic transport, this process is still poorly understood. Here we study the role of karyopherin-β1 (KPNB1) and other nuclear import receptors in regulating TDP-43 pathology.
METHODS
We used immunostaining, immunoprecipitation, biochemical and toxicity assays in cell lines, primary neuron and organotypic mouse brain slice cultures, to determine the impact of KPNB1 on the solubility, localization, and toxicity of pathological TDP-43 constructs. Postmortem patient brain and spinal cord tissue was stained to assess KPNB1 colocalization with TDP-43 inclusions. Turbidity assays were employed to study the dissolution and prevention of aggregation of recombinant TDP-43 fibrils in vitro. Fly models of TDP-43 proteinopathy were used to determine the effect of KPNB1 on their neurodegenerative phenotype in vivo.
RESULTS
We discovered that several members of the nuclear import receptor protein family can reduce the formation of pathological TDP-43 aggregates. Using KPNB1 as a model, we found that its activity depends on the prion-like C-terminal region of TDP-43, which mediates the co-aggregation with phenylalanine and glycine-rich nucleoporins (FG-Nups) such as Nup62. KPNB1 is recruited into these co-aggregates where it acts as a molecular chaperone that reverses aberrant phase transition of Nup62 and TDP-43. These findings are supported by the discovery that Nup62 and KPNB1 are also sequestered into pathological TDP-43 aggregates in ALS/FTD postmortem CNS tissue, and by the identification of the fly ortholog of KPNB1 as a strong protective modifier in Drosophila models of TDP-43 proteinopathy. Our results show that KPNB1 can rescue all hallmarks of TDP-43 pathology, by restoring its solubility and nuclear localization, and reducing neurodegeneration in cellular and animal models of ALS/FTD.
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest a novel NLS-independent mechanism where, analogous to its canonical role in dissolving the diffusion barrier formed by FG-Nups in the nuclear pore, KPNB1 is recruited into TDP-43/FG-Nup co-aggregates present in TDP-43 proteinopathies and therapeutically reverses their deleterious phase transition and mislocalization, mitigating neurodegeneration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36482422
doi: 10.1186/s13024-022-00585-1
pii: 10.1186/s13024-022-00585-1
pmc: PMC9733332
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA-Binding Proteins
0
Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins
0
TDP-43 protein, mouse
0
KPNB1 protein, human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
80Subventions
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : U54NS123743
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P01NS084974
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R21 AG064940
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01NS113943
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R21 NS133676
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01AG059871
Pays : United States
Organisme : CSR NIH HHS
ID : P30AG072931
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS127187
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS105756
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R33 NS110960
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01NS097542
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01NS105756
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01AG077771
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R21AG064940
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : L30 AG048607
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01NS117461
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : RF1AG068581
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R35NS097273
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : RF1 AG068581
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01NS127187
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R21 NS100055
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R21 NS098379
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : T32 NS086749
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R21NS096647
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : RF1 AG076122
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R33NS110960
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG077771
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG072931
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P30AG062677
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 30;113(35):E5212-21
pubmed: 27531960
Neuron. 2017 Apr 5;94(1):48-57.e4
pubmed: 28384474
Brain. 2010 Jun;133(Pt 6):1763-71
pubmed: 20472655
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Feb;21(2):228-239
pubmed: 29311743
Trends Cell Biol. 2019 Apr;29(4):308-322
pubmed: 30660504
Science. 2006 Oct 6;314(5796):130-3
pubmed: 17023659
Cell. 2018 Apr 19;173(3):677-692.e20
pubmed: 29677512
J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 2;30(22):7729-39
pubmed: 20519548
Am J Pathol. 2008 Jul;173(1):182-94
pubmed: 18535185
Cell Rep. 2019 Apr 2;27(1):59-70.e4
pubmed: 30943415
Ann Neurol. 2015 Oct;78(4):568-83
pubmed: 26174152
Hum Mol Genet. 2019 Dec 1;28(23):3982-3996
pubmed: 31626293
Mol Biol Cell. 1997 Jun;8(6):945-56
pubmed: 9201707
J Biol Chem. 2009 Mar 27;284(13):8516-24
pubmed: 19164285
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 12;11(1):3754
pubmed: 33580145
J Exp Med. 2019 Mar 4;216(3):539-555
pubmed: 30770411
Brain Pathol. 2013 Sep;23(5):534-46
pubmed: 23368766
Ann Neurol. 2013 Jul;74(1):20-38
pubmed: 23686809
Aging Cell. 2019 Feb;18(1):e12847
pubmed: 30411463
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Feb;22(2):180-190
pubmed: 30643298
J Mol Biol. 2022 Jan 15;434(1):167220
pubmed: 34464655
Nucleus. 2017 Jul 4;8(4):404-420
pubmed: 28402725
Mol Neurodegener. 2020 Mar 2;15(1):15
pubmed: 32122372
Neurobiol Dis. 2020 Jul;140:104835
pubmed: 32179176
Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Aug 15;21(16):3703-18
pubmed: 22641816
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 13;13(1):3380
pubmed: 35697676
Neuron. 2013 Aug 7;79(3):416-38
pubmed: 23931993
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006 Dec 22;351(3):602-11
pubmed: 17084815
Elife. 2019 Mar 11;8:
pubmed: 30855230
Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7899):124-130
pubmed: 35197626
Brain. 2019 Jun 1;142(6):1503-1527
pubmed: 31039256
Cell. 2009 Mar 20;136(6):1001-4
pubmed: 19303844
Acta Neuropathol. 2014 Mar;127(3):423-439
pubmed: 24407427
Cell Rep. 2022 Jun 28;39(13):111007
pubmed: 35767952
Prog Neurobiol. 2022 Apr;211:102229
pubmed: 35101542
Brain Res. 2018 Aug 15;1693(Pt A):75-91
pubmed: 29462608
Nat Neurosci. 2021 Aug;24(8):1077-1088
pubmed: 34059832
Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):1889-900
pubmed: 11102382
Sci Transl Med. 2020 Sep 2;12(559):
pubmed: 32878979
J Clin Invest. 2020 Mar 2;130(3):1139-1155
pubmed: 31714900
Hum Mol Genet. 2015 Sep 15;24(18):5154-73
pubmed: 26130692
Neuron. 2019 Apr 17;102(2):339-357.e7
pubmed: 30853299
Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7899):131-137
pubmed: 35197628
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 21;105(42):16101-6
pubmed: 18845677
FEBS Lett. 2008 Jun 25;582(15):2252-6
pubmed: 18505686
Front Mol Neurosci. 2019 Feb 14;12:25
pubmed: 30837838
Cell. 2018 Apr 19;173(3):693-705.e22
pubmed: 29677513
Nature. 1999 May 20;399(6733):221-9
pubmed: 10353244
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2009 Nov;68(11):1184-92
pubmed: 19816199
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2020 Jun;64:112-123
pubmed: 32474299
Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Feb 02;9:826719
pubmed: 35187086
Front Cell Neurosci. 2020 Jan 17;13:574
pubmed: 32009905
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23525
pubmed: 21858155
Mol Neurodegener. 2019 Feb 15;14(1):9
pubmed: 30767771
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Sep;136(3):405-423
pubmed: 29881994
J Neurochem. 2009 Nov;111(4):1051-61
pubmed: 19765185
Ann Neurol. 2007 May;61(5):435-45
pubmed: 17469117
Cell. 2018 Apr 19;173(3):720-734.e15
pubmed: 29677515
Elife. 2020 Mar 02;9:
pubmed: 32119645
Nature. 2022 Jan;601(7891):139-143
pubmed: 34880495
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 03;7:39994
pubmed: 28045133
J Cell Sci. 2016 Nov 1;129(21):3963-3970
pubmed: 27802131
EMBO J. 2002 Feb 1;21(3):377-86
pubmed: 11823430
Neuron. 2019 Jan 16;101(2):349
pubmed: 30653936
J Clin Neurol. 2019 Jan;15(1):62-67
pubmed: 30618218
Cell. 2018 Apr 19;173(3):706-719.e13
pubmed: 29677514
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 25;10(1):4890
pubmed: 31653829
Cell Rep. 2020 Dec 22;33(12):108538
pubmed: 33357437
Bioessays. 2022 Dec;44(12):e2200181
pubmed: 36253101
Front Mol Neurosci. 2017 Feb 24;10:46
pubmed: 28286471
EMBO Rep. 2013 Feb;14(2):178-83
pubmed: 23238392
Neuron. 2018 Sep 5;99(5):925-940.e7
pubmed: 30189209
J Biol Chem. 2021 Jan-Jun;296:100659
pubmed: 33857479
Cell Rep. 2019 Jan 15;26(3):582-593.e5
pubmed: 30650353
J Cell Biol. 2003 Aug 4;162(3):391-401
pubmed: 12885761
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Feb;22(2):167-179
pubmed: 30643292
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2021 Apr;1868(5):118984
pubmed: 33549703
J Microsc. 2006 Dec;224(Pt 3):213-32
pubmed: 17210054
Elife. 2021 May 26;10:
pubmed: 34060470
J Mol Biol. 1997 Mar 7;266(4):722-32
pubmed: 9102465
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Mar;135(3):459-474
pubmed: 29196813
Trends Biochem Sci. 2016 Jan;41(1):46-61
pubmed: 26705895
PLoS Genet. 2020 Feb 13;16(2):e1008590
pubmed: 32053595
FASEB J. 2020 Jan;34(1):1532-1545
pubmed: 31914646
Mol Neurodegener. 2020 Aug 15;15(1):45
pubmed: 32799899