Development of a predictive model for unplanned intensive care unit admission after pancreatic resection within an enhanced recovery pathway.
Intensive care unit
Organ failure
Pancreatectomy
Pancreatic neoplasm
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2023
04 2023
Historique:
received:
22
03
2022
accepted:
27
11
2022
medline:
11
4
2023
pubmed:
13
12
2022
entrez:
12
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is unclear whether routine postoperative admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) can improve outcomes for patients undergoing elective pancreatic surgery. Aim of the study was to determine preoperative and intraoperative predictors of unplanned ICU access in patients undergoing pancreatectomy treated within an established enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) and compare outcomes between direct and late ICU admission. A retrospective observational study was conducted on adult patients who underwent pancreatic resection (2015-2019) within an ERP. Patients with preoperatively planned ICU admission were excluded from the study. Multiple multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to verify the association of preoperative and intraoperative variables with study outcomes. The study included 1486 consecutive patients (cancer diagnosis 60%, pancreaticoduodenectomy 60%; laparoscopic approach 20%; vascular resection 9%). Sixty-six (4.4%) patients had an unplanned ICU admission. Direct admission occurred in 22 (33%) patients and late ICU admission in 44 (67%) patients. Mortality was significantly lower in direct admission group (n = 3, 14%) compared to late admission (n = 25, 57%; p > 0.001). A comprehensive model including preoperative and intraoperative variables identified ASA score ≥ 3 (OR 5.59, p value < 0.001), history of hypertension (OR 2.29, p = 0.029), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 3.05, p = 0.026), proximal pancreatic resection (OR 2.79, p value 0.046), multivisceral resection (OR 8.86, p value < 0.001), high intraoperative blood loss (OR 1.01 per ml, p < 0.001), and increased serum lactate at the end of surgery (OR 1.25, p = 0.017) as independent factors associated with ICU admission. Area under the ROC curve was 0.891. Patient comorbidities, surgical complexity, and lactic acidosis at the end of surgery were associated with unplanned postoperative ICU admission. Late ICU admission had very high mortality rates compared to direct admission. Our findings suggest that patients with a combination of preoperative and intraoperative risk factors could benefit from upfront postoperative ICU admission to potentially improve postoperative outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
It is unclear whether routine postoperative admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) can improve outcomes for patients undergoing elective pancreatic surgery. Aim of the study was to determine preoperative and intraoperative predictors of unplanned ICU access in patients undergoing pancreatectomy treated within an established enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) and compare outcomes between direct and late ICU admission.
METHODS
A retrospective observational study was conducted on adult patients who underwent pancreatic resection (2015-2019) within an ERP. Patients with preoperatively planned ICU admission were excluded from the study. Multiple multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to verify the association of preoperative and intraoperative variables with study outcomes.
RESULTS
The study included 1486 consecutive patients (cancer diagnosis 60%, pancreaticoduodenectomy 60%; laparoscopic approach 20%; vascular resection 9%). Sixty-six (4.4%) patients had an unplanned ICU admission. Direct admission occurred in 22 (33%) patients and late ICU admission in 44 (67%) patients. Mortality was significantly lower in direct admission group (n = 3, 14%) compared to late admission (n = 25, 57%; p > 0.001). A comprehensive model including preoperative and intraoperative variables identified ASA score ≥ 3 (OR 5.59, p value < 0.001), history of hypertension (OR 2.29, p = 0.029), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 3.05, p = 0.026), proximal pancreatic resection (OR 2.79, p value 0.046), multivisceral resection (OR 8.86, p value < 0.001), high intraoperative blood loss (OR 1.01 per ml, p < 0.001), and increased serum lactate at the end of surgery (OR 1.25, p = 0.017) as independent factors associated with ICU admission. Area under the ROC curve was 0.891.
CONCLUSION
Patient comorbidities, surgical complexity, and lactic acidosis at the end of surgery were associated with unplanned postoperative ICU admission. Late ICU admission had very high mortality rates compared to direct admission. Our findings suggest that patients with a combination of preoperative and intraoperative risk factors could benefit from upfront postoperative ICU admission to potentially improve postoperative outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36509947
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09787-6
pii: 10.1007/s00464-022-09787-6
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2932-2942Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Uzunoglu FG, Reeh M, Vettorazzi E, Ruschke T, Hannah P, Nentwich MF, Vashist YK, Bogoevski D, König A, Janot M, Gavazzi F, Zerbi A, Todaro V, Malleo G, Uhl W, Montorsi M, Bassi C, Izbicki JR, Bockhorn M (2014) Preoperative Pancreatic Resection (PREPARE) score: a prospective multicenter-based morbidity risk score. Ann Surg 260:857–864
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000946
pubmed: 25243549
Braga M, Capretti G, Pecorelli N, Balzano G, Doglioni C, Ariotti R, Di Carlo V (2011) A prognostic score to predict major complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 254:702–707
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823598fb
pubmed: 22042466
Quero G, Pecorelli N, Paiella S, Fiorillo C, Petrone MC, Capretti G, Laterza V, De Sio D, Menghi R, Kauffmann E, Nobile S, Butturini G, Ferrari G, Rosa F, Coratti A, Casadei R, Mazzaferro V, Boggi U, Zerbi A, Salvia R, Falconi M, Alfieri S (2022) Pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians: the importance of “biological age” on clinical outcomes. Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SURONC.2021.101688
doi: 10.1016/J.SURONC.2021.101688
pubmed: 35189515
Jhanji S, Thomas B, Ely A, Watson D, Hinds CJ, Pearse RM (2008) Mortality and utilisation of critical care resources amongst high-risk surgical patients in a large NHS trust. Anaesthesia 63:695–700
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05560.x
pubmed: 18489613
Kahan BC, Koulenti D, Arvaniti K, Beavis V, Campbell D, Chan M, Moreno R, Pearse RM, International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS) group (2017) Critical care admission following elective surgery was not associated with survival benefit: prospective analysis of data from 27 countries. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4633-8,April25
doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4633-8,April25
Wunsch H, Gershengorn HB, Cooke CR, Guerra C, Angus DC, Rowe JW, Li G (2016) Use of intensive care services for medicare beneficiaries undergoing major surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 124:899–907
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001024
pubmed: 26825149
Ghaffar S, Pearse RM, Gillies MA (2017) ICU admission after surgery: who benefits? Curr Opin Crit Care 23(5):424–429
doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000448
pubmed: 28777159
Melloul E, Hübner M, Scott M, Snowden C, Prentis J, Dejong CHC, Garden OJ, Farges O, Kokudo N, Vauthey JN, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2016) Guidelines for perioperative care for liver surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. World J Surg 40:2425–2440
doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3700-1
pubmed: 27549599
Loftus TJ, Balch JA, Ruppert MM, Tighe PJ, Hogan WR, Rashidi P, Upchurch GR, Bihorac A (2022) Aligning patient acuity with resource intensity after major surgery: a scoping review. Ann Surg 275:332–339
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005079
pubmed: 34261886
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2014) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013July18
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013July18
Braga M, Pecorelli N, Ariotti R, Capretti G, Greco M, Balzano G, Castoldi R, Beretta L (2014) Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 38:2960–2966
doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2653-5
pubmed: 24870390
Pecorelli N, Mazza M, Guarneri G, Delpini R, Partelli S, Balzano G, Turi S, Meani R, Beretta L, Falconi M (2021) Impact of care pathway adherence on recovery following distal pancreatectomy within an enhanced recovery program. HPB (Oxford) 23:1815–1823
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.016
pubmed: 33975798
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
pubmed: 28040257
Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)-An International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001
pubmed: 17629996
Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005
pubmed: 17981197
Berriós-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, Reinke CE, Morgan S, Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Dellinger EP, Itani KMF, Berbari EF, Segreti J, Parvizi J, Blanchard J, Allen G, Kluytmans JAJW, Donlan R, Schecter WP (2017) Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg 152:784–791
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904
pubmed: 28467526
Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B (2005) Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point. Biometrical J 47:458–472
doi: 10.1002/bimj.200410135
Carter JV, Pan J, Rai SN, Galandiuk S (2016) ROC-ing along: evaluation and interpretation of receiver operating characteristic curves. Surgery 159:1638–1645
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.029
pubmed: 26962006
Mackay TM, Gleeson EM, Wellner UF, Williamsson C, Busch OR, Groot Koerkamp B, Keck T, van Santvoort HC, Tingstedt B, Pitt HA, Besselink MG (2021) Transatlantic registries of pancreatic surgery in the United States of America, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden: comparing design, variables, patients, treatment strategies, and outcomes. Surgery 169:396–402
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.07.012
pubmed: 32868111
Rice DR, Hyer JM, Tsilimigras D, Pawlik TM (2022) Implications of intensive care unit admissions among medicare beneficiaries following resection of pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol 125:405–413
doi: 10.1002/jso.26710
pubmed: 34608989
Cerullo M, Gani F, Chen SY, Canner JK, Dillhoff M, Cloyd J, Pawlik TM (2019) Routine intensive care unit admission among patients undergoing major pancreatic surgery for cancer: no effect on failure to rescue. Surgery 165:741–746
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.11.005
pubmed: 30551866
Onwochei DN, Fabes J, Walker D, Kumar G, Moonesinghe SR (2020) Critical care after major surgery: a systematic review of risk factors for unplanned admission. Anaesthesia 75(Suppl 1):e62–e74
pubmed: 31903563
Pan T, Chen XL, Liu K, Peng BQ, Zhang WH, Yan MH, Ge R, Zhao LY, Yang K, Chen XZ, Hu JK (2022) Nomogram to predict intensive care following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a useful clinical tool to guide the decision-making of intensive care unit admission. Front Oncol 11:641124
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641124
pubmed: 35087739
pmcid: 8787126
Andersen L (2017) Lactate elevation during and after major cardiac surgery in adults: a review of etiology, prognostic value, and management. Anesth Analg 125:743–752
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001928
pubmed: 28277327
Chandrabalan VV, McMillan DC, Carter R, Kinsella J, McKay CJ, Carter CR, Dickson EJ (2013) Pre-operative cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts adverse post-operative events and non-progression to adjuvant therapy after major pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford) 15:899–907
doi: 10.1111/hpb.12060
pubmed: 23458160
Smith TB, Stonell C, Purkayastha S, Paraskevas P (2009) Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a risk assessment method in non cardio-pulmonary surgery: a systematic review. Anaesthesia 64:883–893
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05983.x
pubmed: 19604193
Wang J, Ma R, Eleftheriou P, Churilov L, Debono D, Robbins R, Nikfarjam M, Christophi C, Weinberg L (2018) Health economic implications of complications associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy at a University Hospital: a retrospective cohort cost study. HPB (Oxford) 20:423–431
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.11.001
pubmed: 29248401