Hypoxia signatures in closed-circuit rebreather divers.
Physiology
Rescue
Safety
Technical diving
Journal
Diving and hyperbaric medicine
ISSN: 1833-3516
Titre abrégé: Diving Hyperb Med
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101282742
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Dec 2022
20 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
19
01
2022
accepted:
01
10
2022
entrez:
16
12
2022
pubmed:
17
12
2022
medline:
21
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Faults or errors during use of closed-circuit rebreathers (CCRs) can cause hypoxia. Military aviators face a similar risk of hypoxia and undergo awareness training to determine their 'hypoxia signature', a personalised, reproducible set of symptoms. We aimed to establish a hypoxia signature among divers, and to investigate their ability to detect hypoxia and self-rescue while cognitively overloaded. Eight CCR divers and 12 scuba divers underwent an initial unblinded hypoxia exposure followed by three trials; a second hypoxic trial and two normoxic trials in randomised order. Hypoxia was induced by breathing on a CCR with no oxygen supply. Subjects pedalled on a cycle ergometer while playing a neurocognitive computer game to simulate real world task loading. Subjects identified hypoxia symptoms by pointing to a board listing common hypoxia symptoms, and were instructed to perform a 'bailout' procedure to mimic self-rescue if they perceived hypoxia. Divers were prompted to bailout if peripheral oxygen saturation fell to 75%, or after six minutes during normoxic trials. Subsequently we interviewed subjects to determine their ability to distinguish hypoxia from normoxia. Ninety-five percent of subjects (19/20) showed agreement between unblinded and blinded hypoxia symptoms. Subjects correctly identified the gas mixture in 85% of the trials. During unblinded hypoxia, only 25% (5/20) of subjects performed unprompted bailout. Fifty-five percent of subjects (11/20) correctly performed the bailout but only when prompted, while 15% (3/20) were unable to bailout despite prompting. During blinded hypoxia 45% of subjects (9/20) performed the bailout unprompted while 15% (3/20) remained unable to bailout despite prompting. Although our data support a normobaric hypoxia signature among both CCR and scuba divers under experimental conditions, most subjects were unable to recognise hypoxia in real time and perform a self-rescue unprompted, although this improved in the second hypoxia trial. These results do not support hypoxia exposure training for CCR divers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36525681
doi: 10.28920/dhm52.4.237-244
pmc: PMC9767826
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
237-244Informations de copyright
Copyright: This article is the copyright of the authors who grant Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine a non-exclusive licence to publish the article in electronic and other forms.
Références
Diving Hyperb Med. 2013 Jun;43(2):78-85
pubmed: 23813461
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012 Oct;83(10):962-7
pubmed: 23066618
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2014 Nov 10;7:297-302
pubmed: 25419162
Mil Med. 2011 Apr;176(4):446-50
pubmed: 21539168
Diving Hyperb Med. 2019 Jun 30;49(2):112-118
pubmed: 31177517
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2003 Feb;74(2):169-72
pubmed: 12602449
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2008 Jan;79(1):54-7
pubmed: 18225780