Anatomical Study of Sites and Surface Area of the Attachment Region of Tibial Posterior Tendon Attachment.
attachment site
surface area region
tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 12 2022
08 12 2022
Historique:
received:
15
11
2022
revised:
04
12
2022
accepted:
05
12
2022
entrez:
23
12
2022
pubmed:
24
12
2022
medline:
27
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was not only to examine the attachment site but also to quantify the effect of the tibialis posterior tendon (TPT) on each attachment site by examining the surface area of the attachment region. We examined 100 feet from 50 Japanese cadavers. The TPT attachment to the navicular bone (NB), medial cuneiform bone (MCB), and lateral cuneiform bone (LCB) were set as the main attachment sites (Type I). The attachment seen in Type I with the addition of one additional site of attachment was defined as Type II. Furthermore, surface area was measured using a three-dimensional scanner. Attachment to the NB, MCB, and LCB was present in all specimens. The TPT attachment to the NB, MCB, and LCB comprised 75.1% of total attachment surface area. The ratio of the NB, MCB, and LCB in each type was about 90% in Types II and III, and 70-80% in Types IV-VII. The quantitative results demonstrated the NB, MCB, and LCB to be the main sites of TPT attachment, although individual differences in attachment sites exist, further developing the findings of previous studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was not only to examine the attachment site but also to quantify the effect of the tibialis posterior tendon (TPT) on each attachment site by examining the surface area of the attachment region.
METHODS
We examined 100 feet from 50 Japanese cadavers. The TPT attachment to the navicular bone (NB), medial cuneiform bone (MCB), and lateral cuneiform bone (LCB) were set as the main attachment sites (Type I). The attachment seen in Type I with the addition of one additional site of attachment was defined as Type II. Furthermore, surface area was measured using a three-dimensional scanner.
RESULTS
Attachment to the NB, MCB, and LCB was present in all specimens. The TPT attachment to the NB, MCB, and LCB comprised 75.1% of total attachment surface area. The ratio of the NB, MCB, and LCB in each type was about 90% in Types II and III, and 70-80% in Types IV-VII.
CONCLUSION
The quantitative results demonstrated the NB, MCB, and LCB to be the main sites of TPT attachment, although individual differences in attachment sites exist, further developing the findings of previous studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36554392
pii: ijerph192416510
doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416510
pmc: PMC9779476
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2017;76(4):682-688
pubmed: 28553850
Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Mar;40(3):352-355
pubmed: 30466312
Ann Anat. 2016 Mar;204:80-5
pubmed: 26704354
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Aug;(365):12-22
pubmed: 10627682
Kardiol Pol. 1963;46:97-103
pubmed: 14059654
J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 May 19;13(1):25
pubmed: 32430082
Surg Radiol Anat. 2020 Oct;42(10):1141-1144
pubmed: 32651612
J Orthop Res. 2014 Jan;32(1):102-9
pubmed: 24115238
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 04;11(9):
pubmed: 34573961
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Foot Ankle Int. 2003 Oct;24(10):780-3
pubmed: 14587993
J Foot Ankle Res. 2009 Aug 19;2:24
pubmed: 19691828
Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Dec;27(8):920-927
pubmed: 33386233
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Feb;(239):196-206
pubmed: 2912622
Foot Ankle Int. 2004 Jul;25(7):445-50
pubmed: 15319100
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Sep;41(9):1049-1055
pubmed: 32567358
Clin Anat. 2019 May;32(4):557-565
pubmed: 30758860
Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;15(2):75-81
pubmed: 19410173
J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 Aug 30;11:49
pubmed: 30186369