Investigating the Long-term Effect of Pregnancy on the Course of Multiple Sclerosis Using Causal Inference.
Journal
Neurology
ISSN: 1526-632X
Titre abrégé: Neurology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 03 2023
21 03 2023
Historique:
received:
28
04
2022
accepted:
17
11
2022
pubmed:
24
12
2022
medline:
23
3
2023
entrez:
23
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The question of the long-term safety of pregnancy is a major concern in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), but its study is biased by reverse causation (women with higher disability are less likely to experience pregnancy). Using a causal inference approach, we aimed to estimate the unbiased long-term effects of pregnancy on disability and relapse risk in patients with MS and secondarily the short-term effects (during the perpartum and postpartum years) and delayed effects (occurring beyond 1 year after delivery). We conducted an observational cohort study with data from patients with MS followed in the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques registry between 1990 and 2020. We included female patients with MS aged 18-45 years at MS onset, clinically followed up for more than 2 years, and with ≥3 Expanded Disease Status Scale (EDSS) measurements. Outcomes were the mean EDSS score at the end of follow-up and the annual probability of relapse during follow-up. Counterfactual outcomes were predicted using the longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimator in the entire study population. The patients exposed to at least 1 pregnancy during their follow-up were compared with the counterfactual situation in which, contrary to what was observed, they would not have been exposed to any pregnancy. Short-term and delayed effects were analyzed from the first pregnancy of early-exposed patients (who experienced it during their first 3 years of follow-up). We included 9,100 patients, with a median follow-up duration of 7.8 years, of whom 2,125 (23.4%) patients were exposed to at least 1 pregnancy. Pregnancy had no significant long-term causal effect on the mean EDSS score at 9 years (causal mean difference [95% CI] = 0.00 [-0.16 to 0.15]) or on the annual probability of relapse (causal risk ratio [95% CI] = 0.95 [0.93-1.38]). For the 1,253 early-exposed patients, pregnancy significantly decreased the probability of relapse during the perpartum year and significantly increased it during the postpartum year, but no significant delayed effect was found on the EDSS and relapse rate. Using a causal inference approach, we found no evidence of significantly deleterious or beneficial long-term effects of pregnancy on disability. The beneficial effects found in other studies were probably related to a reverse causation bias.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
The question of the long-term safety of pregnancy is a major concern in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), but its study is biased by reverse causation (women with higher disability are less likely to experience pregnancy). Using a causal inference approach, we aimed to estimate the unbiased long-term effects of pregnancy on disability and relapse risk in patients with MS and secondarily the short-term effects (during the perpartum and postpartum years) and delayed effects (occurring beyond 1 year after delivery).
METHODS
We conducted an observational cohort study with data from patients with MS followed in the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques registry between 1990 and 2020. We included female patients with MS aged 18-45 years at MS onset, clinically followed up for more than 2 years, and with ≥3 Expanded Disease Status Scale (EDSS) measurements. Outcomes were the mean EDSS score at the end of follow-up and the annual probability of relapse during follow-up. Counterfactual outcomes were predicted using the longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimator in the entire study population. The patients exposed to at least 1 pregnancy during their follow-up were compared with the counterfactual situation in which, contrary to what was observed, they would not have been exposed to any pregnancy. Short-term and delayed effects were analyzed from the first pregnancy of early-exposed patients (who experienced it during their first 3 years of follow-up).
RESULTS
We included 9,100 patients, with a median follow-up duration of 7.8 years, of whom 2,125 (23.4%) patients were exposed to at least 1 pregnancy. Pregnancy had no significant long-term causal effect on the mean EDSS score at 9 years (causal mean difference [95% CI] = 0.00 [-0.16 to 0.15]) or on the annual probability of relapse (causal risk ratio [95% CI] = 0.95 [0.93-1.38]). For the 1,253 early-exposed patients, pregnancy significantly decreased the probability of relapse during the perpartum year and significantly increased it during the postpartum year, but no significant delayed effect was found on the EDSS and relapse rate.
DISCUSSION
Using a causal inference approach, we found no evidence of significantly deleterious or beneficial long-term effects of pregnancy on disability. The beneficial effects found in other studies were probably related to a reverse causation bias.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36564207
pii: WNL.0000000000206774
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000206774
pmc: PMC10033171
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1296-e1308Informations de copyright
© 2022 American Academy of Neurology.
Références
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1994 Feb;96(1):38-41
pubmed: 8187380
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;55(8):671-6
pubmed: 1527537
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 08;11(7):e0158978
pubmed: 27391947
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;83(8):793-5
pubmed: 22626946
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Feb 12;17(2):234
pubmed: 26907250
Mult Scler. 2020 Jul;26(8):902-911
pubmed: 31144565
Brain. 1995 Feb;118 ( Pt 1):253-61
pubmed: 7895009
Neurology. 2019 Mar 26;92(13):e1507-e1516
pubmed: 30824557
J Neurol. 2012 May;259(5):855-61
pubmed: 21993617
Mult Scler. 2013 Mar;19(3):351-8
pubmed: 22760102
Mult Scler. 2022 Jul;28(8):1239-1247
pubmed: 34791952
Mult Scler. 2020 Jan;26(1):118-122
pubmed: 30541380
Int J Biostat. 2012;8(1):
pubmed: 22611591
Eur Neurol. 2015;74(5-6):296-302
pubmed: 26656283
Mult Scler. 2015 Sep;21(10):1291-7
pubmed: 25533293
Ann Neurol. 1983 Mar;13(3):227-31
pubmed: 6847134
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):323-335
pubmed: 26988930
Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302
pubmed: 21387374
J Immunol. 2007 Dec 15;179(12):8146-52
pubmed: 18056357
Stat Med. 2013 Apr 30;32(9):1584-618
pubmed: 23208861
Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52
pubmed: 6685237
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Sep 15;168(6):656-64
pubmed: 18682488
Ann Neurol. 2001 Jul;50(1):121-7
pubmed: 11456302
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Feb;28:235-243
pubmed: 30623864
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;80(6):676-8
pubmed: 19448093
Front Neurol. 2021 Apr 28;12:620772
pubmed: 33995240
Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):550-60
pubmed: 10955408
Ann Neurol. 2016 Jul;80(1):89-100
pubmed: 27145331
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;81(1):38-41
pubmed: 19939856
Ann Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;24(7):504-8.e2
pubmed: 24935463
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 30;339(5):285-91
pubmed: 9682040
Mult Scler. 2006 Aug;12(4):421-7
pubmed: 16900755