A novel concept for estimating the contaminant mass discharge of chlorinated ethenes emanating from clay till sites.

Contaminant flux Contaminant plume Depth discrete concentration profiles Groundwater solute transport model Risk assessment

Journal

Journal of contaminant hydrology
ISSN: 1873-6009
Titre abrégé: J Contam Hydrol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8805644

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2023
Historique:
received: 30 08 2022
revised: 24 10 2022
accepted: 28 11 2022
pubmed: 25 12 2022
medline: 10 1 2023
entrez: 24 12 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Interest in using contaminant mass discharge (CMD) for risk assessment of contaminated sites has increased over the years, as it accounts for the contaminant mass that is moving and posing a risk to water resources and receptors. The most common investigation of CMD involves a transect of multilevel wells; however, this is an expensive undertaking, and it is difficult to place it in the right position in a plume. Additionally, infrastructure at the site needs to be considered. To derive an initial CMD estimate at a contaminated site and to allow for the prioritization of further investigations and remedial actions, the ProfileFlux method has been developed. It is targeted at former industrial sites with a source zone in a low conductivity layer with primarily vertical flow overlying an aquifer with primarily horizontal groundwater flow. The ProfileFlux method was developed for mature chlorinated solvent plumes, typically originating from more than 30 to 50-year-old spills, as the usage of chlorinated solvents is primarily historical. Thus, it is assumed that the contaminant had time to distribute in the low conductivity layer by mainly diffusive processes. Today the contamination is continuously released to the underlying aquifer, where advection and dispersive (other than diffusive) processes are of higher importance. The approach combines high-resolution, depth-discrete vertical concentration profiles and a simple 2D flow and transport model to estimate CMD by comparing measured and simulated concentration profiles. The study presented herein includes a global sensitivity analysis, in order to identify crucial field parameters, and of particular importance in this regard are source length, groundwater flux and infiltration. The ProfileFlux method was tested at a well-examined industrial site primarily contaminated with trichloroethylene, thereby allowing a comparison between CMD from the ProfileFlux method and the traditional transect method. CMD was estimated at 117-170 g/year, when using the ProfileFlux method, against 143 g/year with the transect method, thus validating ProfileFlux method's ability to estimate CMD. In addition, applying the method identified weak points in the conceptual site model. The method will be incorporated into a user-friendly online tool directed at environmental consultants and decision-makers working on the risk assessment and prioritization of contaminated sites with the specific hydrogeological conditions of an aquifer with an overlying low permeability layer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36565588
pii: S0169-7722(22)00169-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.104121
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

ethylene 91GW059KN7
Clay T1FAD4SS2M
Water Pollutants, Chemical 0
Trichloroethylene 290YE8AR51
Solvents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104121

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Louise Rosenberg (L)

Technical University of Denmark, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Bygningstorvet 115, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark. Electronic address: lour@dtu.dk.

Klaus Mosthaf (K)

Technical University of Denmark, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Bygningstorvet 115, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.

Mette M Broholm (MM)

Technical University of Denmark, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Bygningstorvet 115, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.

Annika S Fjordbøge (AS)

Technical University of Denmark, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Bygningstorvet 115, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.

Nina Tuxen (N)

Capital Region of Denmark, Kongens Vænge 2, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark.

Ida Henriette Kerrn-Jespersen (IH)

Capital Region of Denmark, Kongens Vænge 2, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark.

Vinni Rønde (V)

Capital Region of Denmark, Kongens Vænge 2, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark.

Poul L Bjerg (PL)

Technical University of Denmark, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Bygningstorvet 115, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.

Articles similaires

Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal

Hydrochemical characterization and pCO

Kunarika Bhanot, M K Sharma, R D Kaushik
1.00
Rivers Environmental Monitoring Carbon Dioxide Water Pollutants, Chemical India
Wetlands Massachusetts Chlorides Groundwater Environmental Monitoring
1.00
Iran Drinking Water Humans Lithium Suicide, Attempted

Classifications MeSH