Comparative outcomes and cost of ambulatory PCNL in select kidney stone patients.
Ambulatory surgery
Cost
Nephrolithiasis
Outcomes
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Journal
Urolithiasis
ISSN: 2194-7236
Titre abrégé: Urolithiasis
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101602699
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Dec 2022
26 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
16
09
2022
accepted:
02
12
2022
entrez:
26
12
2022
pubmed:
27
12
2022
medline:
29
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Limited hospital resources and access to care during the COVID-19 pandemic led us to implement a quality-improvement study investigating the feasibility, safety, and costs of same-day discharge after PCNL. The outcomes of 53 consecutive first-look PCNL patients included in a same-day discharge protocol during COVID-19 were compared to 54 first-look PCNL patients admitted for overnight observation. Control group had a similar comorbidity profile. Demographics, operative details, 30 day outcomes and readmissions, complications, and cost were compared between the two groups. Same-day discharge and one-day admission post-PCNL patients did not have significantly different baseline characteristics. The study group were more likely to have mini-PCNL (81% vs 50%, p < 0.01). Operative characteristics including median pre-operative stone burden (1.4 vs 1.7 cm
Identifiants
pubmed: 36571653
doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01392-5
pii: 10.1007/s00240-022-01392-5
pmc: PMC9791625
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
22Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP et al (2009) Surgical management of stones: American urological association/endourological society guideline, PART 1. J Urol 196:1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090
de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R, Tefekli A, CROES PCNL Study Group (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 25:11. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0424
doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0424
pubmed: 21247286
Taylor E, Miller J, Chi T, Stoller ML (2012) Complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Trans Androl Urol 1:223–228. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2012.12.01
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2012.12.01
Lange JN, Gutierrez-Aceves J (2018) Comparative outcomes of convential and miniature percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones- does a miniaturized tract improved quality of care? Urology Practice 5:205–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urpr.2017.04.003
doi: 10.1016/j.urpr.2017.04.003
pubmed: 37300219
Mues E, Gutierrez-Aceves J, Loske AM (2007) Percutaneous renal access: a simplified approach. J Endourol 21:1271–1275. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2007.9887
doi: 10.1089/end.2007.9887
pubmed: 18042013
Jendeberg J, Geijer H, Alshamari M, Lidén M (2018) Prediction of spontaneous ureteral stone passage: automated 3D-measurements perform equal to radiologists, and linear measurements equal to volumetric. Eur Radiol 28(6):2474–2483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5242-9
doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5242-9
pubmed: 29368161
pmcid: 5938294
Preminger GM, Clayman RV, Curry T, Redman HC, Peters PC (1986) Outpatient percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 136:355–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)44867-1
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)44867-1
pubmed: 3735494
Seitz C, Desai M, Hacker A, Hakenberg OW, Laitsikos E, Nagele U et al (2012) Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolithopaxy. Eur Urol 61:146–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.016
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.016
pubmed: 21978422
Emmott AS, Brotherhood HL, Paterson RF, Lange D, Chew BH (2018) Complications, Re-Intervention rates, and natural history of residual stone fragments after nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 32:28–32. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0618
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0618
pubmed: 29037066
Beiko D, Lee L (2010) Outpatient tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the initial case series. Can Urol Association J 4:E86-90. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.886
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.886
Sharour W, Andonian S (2010) Ambulatory percutaneously nephrolithotomy: initially series. Urology 76:1288–1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.001
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.001
Fahmey A, Rashad M, Algebaly O, Sameh W (2017) Can percutaneous nephrolithotomy be performed as an outpatient procedure? Arab. J Urol 15:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2016.11.006
doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.11.006
El-Tabey MA, Abd-Allah OAW, Ahmed AS, El-Barky EM, Noureldin YAS (2013) Preliminary study of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on an ambulatory basis. Curr Urol 7:117–121. https://doi.org/10.1159/000356261
doi: 10.1159/000356261
pubmed: 24917771
Singh I, Kumar A, Kumar P (2005) “Ambulatory PCNL” (tubeless PCNL under regional anesthesia) – a preliminary report of 10 cases. Int Urol Nephrol 37:35–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-004-6706-9
doi: 10.1007/s11255-004-6706-9
pubmed: 16132756
Wu X (2020) Day Surgery percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a high-volume center retrospective experience. World J Urol 38:1323–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02942-0
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02942-0
pubmed: 31522237
Schoenfeld D, Zhou T, Stern JM (2019) Outcomes for patients undergoing ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 33:189–193. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0579
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0579
pubmed: 30489147
Bechis SK (2018) Outpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the UC San Diego Health Experience. J Endourol 32:394–401. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0056
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0056
pubmed: 29634376
Holst DD, Bechis SK, Zupkas P, Zupkas R, Dipina T, Flores A et al (2001) Minimally Invasive Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: initially north American experience. J Endourol 35:596–600. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0574
doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0574
Beiko D, Elkoushy MA, Kokorovic A, Roberts G, Robb S, Andonian S (2015) Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the rate of readmission. J Endourol 29:410–414. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0574
doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0574
pubmed: 25221917
Wang J, Zhang C, Tan D, Tan G, Yang B, Chen W et al (2016) The effect of local anesthetic infiltration around nephrostomy tract on post operative pain control after percutaneous nephrolithotomy a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int 97:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1159/000447306
doi: 10.1159/000447306
pubmed: 27379709
Feng D, Hu X, Tang Y, Han P, Wei X (2020) The efficacy and safety of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Investig Clin Urol 61:115–126. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2020.61.2.115
doi: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.2.115
pubmed: 32158962
pmcid: 7052418
Beiko D, Andonian S (2015) Getting started with ambulatory PCNL: a Can MEDS perspective. Can Urol Assoc J 9:223–225. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.3198
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3198
pubmed: 26316901
pmcid: 4537328
Choi SW, Choi KS, Kim JH, Park YH, Bae WJ, Hong SH et al (2014) Totally tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: analysis of clinical outcomes and cost. J Endourol 28:1487–1494. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0421
doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0421
pubmed: 25177908
Li Q, Gao L, Li J, Zhang Y, Jiang Q (2012) Totally tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. J Endourol 27:420–426. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0421
doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0421
Leow JJ, Valiquette AS, Chung BI, Chang SL, Trinh QD, Korets R et al (2018) Cost variations for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the US from 2003–2015: a contemporary analysis of an all-payer discharge database. Can Urol Assoc J 12:407–414. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.5280
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5280
pubmed: 29940133
pmcid: 6261720