Interpreting the CPASS Trial: Do Not Shift Motor Therapy to the Subacute Phase.


Journal

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
ISSN: 1552-6844
Titre abrégé: Neurorehabil Neural Repair
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100892086

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 29 12 2022
medline: 3 2 2023
entrez: 28 12 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Critical Periods After Stroke Study (CPASS, n = 72) showed that, compared to controls, an additional 20 hours of intensive upper limb therapy led to variable gains on the Action Research Arm Test depending on when therapy was started post-stroke: the subacute group (2-3 months) improved beyond the minimal clinically important difference and the acute group (0-1 month) showed smaller but statistically significant improvement, but the chronic group (6-9 months) did not demonstrate improvement that reached significance. Some have misinterpreted CPASS results to indicate that all inpatient motor therapy should be shifted to outpatient therapy delivered 2 to 3 months post-stroke. Instead, however, CPASS argues for a large dose of motor therapy delivered continuously and cumulatively during the acute and subacute phases. When interpreting trials like CPASS, one must consider the substantial dose of early usual customary care (UCC) motor therapy that all participants received. CPASS participants averaged 27.9 hours of UCC occupational therapy (OT) during the first 2 months and 9.8 hours of UCC OT during the third and fourth months post-stroke. Any recovery experienced would therefore result not just from CPASS intensive motor therapy but the combined effects of experimental therapy plus UCC. Statistical limitations also did not allow direct comparisons of the acute and subacute group outcomes in CPASS. Instead of shifting inpatient therapy hours to the subacute phase, CPASS argues for preserving inpatient UCC. We also recommend conducting multi-site dosing trials to determine whether additional intensive motor therapy delivered in the first 2 to 3 months following inpatient rehabilitation can further improve outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36575958
doi: 10.1177/15459683221143461
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

76-79

Subventions

Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC016902
Pays : United States

Auteurs

Matthew A Edwardson (MA)

Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Research Division, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Kathaleen Brady (K)

Research Division, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Margot L Giannetti (ML)

Research Division, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Shashwati Geed (S)

Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Research Division, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Jessica Barth (J)

Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Abigail Mitchell (A)

Research Division, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Ming T Tan (MT)

Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics & Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.

Yizhao Zhou (Y)

Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics & Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.

Barbara S Bregman (BS)

Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Research Division, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Elissa L Newport (EL)

Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

Dorothy F Edwards (DF)

Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Alexander W Dromerick (AW)

Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Research Division, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH