Researching Compassionate Communities: Identifying theoretical frameworks to evaluate the complex processes behind public health palliative care initiatives.

Public health compassionate communities evaluation methodology implementation science palliative care

Journal

Palliative medicine
ISSN: 1477-030X
Titre abrégé: Palliat Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8704926

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 29 12 2022
medline: 1 2 2023
entrez: 28 12 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Compassionate Communities have been put forward as a new model for community-based palliative care to positively impact the health and wellbeing of those experiencing challenges of serious illness, death, dying, and loss. Despite the growing international movement to develop these public health initiatives to end-of-life care, only a handful of initiatives have undergone some form of evaluation. To provide guidance on designing evaluation research by identifying theoretical frameworks to understand the development, implementation, and underlying mechanisms of Compassionate Communities. To identify suitable theoretical frameworks for the study of Compassionate Communities, we applied two steps. The first step examined the characteristics of Compassionate Communities and translated them into assessment criteria for the selection of theoretical frameworks. The second step consisted of applying the identified assessment criteria to a list of widely used and highly cited theoretical frameworks. Three well-established theoretical frameworks were identified as being most suitable to study the development, implementation, and underlying mechanisms of Compassionate Communities: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework (i-PARIHS), and the Extended Normalization Process Theory (ENPT). The article supports and encourages the use of theoretical frameworks to evaluate the complex processes behind public health palliative care initiatives. The complementary use of two determinant frameworks and an implementation theory provides theoretical grounding to gain rich insights into the emergent and shifting interplays between agency, social processes, and contextual factors that shape the development and implementation of Compassionate Communities.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Compassionate Communities have been put forward as a new model for community-based palliative care to positively impact the health and wellbeing of those experiencing challenges of serious illness, death, dying, and loss. Despite the growing international movement to develop these public health initiatives to end-of-life care, only a handful of initiatives have undergone some form of evaluation.
AIM
To provide guidance on designing evaluation research by identifying theoretical frameworks to understand the development, implementation, and underlying mechanisms of Compassionate Communities.
METHODS
To identify suitable theoretical frameworks for the study of Compassionate Communities, we applied two steps. The first step examined the characteristics of Compassionate Communities and translated them into assessment criteria for the selection of theoretical frameworks. The second step consisted of applying the identified assessment criteria to a list of widely used and highly cited theoretical frameworks.
RESULTS
Three well-established theoretical frameworks were identified as being most suitable to study the development, implementation, and underlying mechanisms of Compassionate Communities: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework (i-PARIHS), and the Extended Normalization Process Theory (ENPT).
CONCLUSIONS
The article supports and encourages the use of theoretical frameworks to evaluate the complex processes behind public health palliative care initiatives. The complementary use of two determinant frameworks and an implementation theory provides theoretical grounding to gain rich insights into the emergent and shifting interplays between agency, social processes, and contextual factors that shape the development and implementation of Compassionate Communities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36576313
doi: 10.1177/02692163221146589
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

291-301

Auteurs

Hanne Bakelants (H)

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Compassionate Communities Center of Expertise (COCO), Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Society and Ageing Research Lab, Belgium.

Steven Vanderstichelen (S)

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Compassionate Communities Center of Expertise (COCO), Belgium.

Kenneth Chambaere (K)

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Compassionate Communities Center of Expertise (COCO), Belgium.

Filip Van Droogenbroeck (F)

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Compassionate Communities Center of Expertise (COCO), Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Tempus Omnia Revelat, Belgium.

Liesbeth De Donder (L)

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Compassionate Communities Center of Expertise (COCO), Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Society and Ageing Research Lab, Belgium.

Luc Deliens (L)

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Compassionate Communities Center of Expertise (COCO), Belgium.

Sarah Dury (S)

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Compassionate Communities Center of Expertise (COCO), Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Society and Ageing Research Lab, Belgium.

Joachim Cohen (J)

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Compassionate Communities Center of Expertise (COCO), Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH