Effect of Remifentanil vs Neuromuscular Blockers During Rapid Sequence Intubation on Successful Intubation Without Major Complications Among Patients at Risk of Aspiration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.


Journal

JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 01 2023
Historique:
entrez: 3 1 2023
pubmed: 4 1 2023
medline: 6 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

It is uncertain whether a rapid-onset opioid is noninferior to a rapid-onset neuromuscular blocker during rapid sequence intubation when used in conjunction with a hypnotic agent. To determine whether remifentanil is noninferior to rapid-onset neuromuscular blockers for rapid sequence intubation. Multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial among 1150 adults at risk of aspiration (fasting for <6 hours, bowel occlusion, recent trauma, or severe gastroesophageal reflux) who underwent tracheal intubation in the operating room at 15 hospitals in France from October 2019 to April 2021. Follow-up was completed on May 15, 2021. Patients were randomized to receive neuromuscular blockers (1 mg/kg of succinylcholine or rocuronium; n = 575) or remifentanil (3 to 4 μg/kg; n = 575) immediately after injection of a hypnotic. The primary outcome was assessed in all randomized patients (as-randomized population) and in all eligible patients who received assigned treatment (per-protocol population). The primary outcome was successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt without major complications, defined as lung aspiration of digestive content, oxygen desaturation, major hemodynamic instability, sustained arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, and severe anaphylactic reaction. The prespecified noninferiority margin was 7.0%. Among 1150 randomized patients (mean age, 50.7 [SD, 17.4] years; 573 [50%] women), 1130 (98.3%) completed the trial. In the as-randomized population, tracheal intubation on the first attempt without major complications occurred in 374 of 575 patients (66.1%) in the remifentanil group and 408 of 575 (71.6%) in the neuromuscular blocker group (between-group difference adjusted for randomization strata and center, -6.1%; 95% CI, -11.6% to -0.5%; P = .37 for noninferiority), demonstrating inferiority. In the per-protocol population, 374 of 565 patients (66.2%) in the remifentanil group and 403 of 565 (71.3%) in the neuromuscular blocker group had successful intubation without major complications (adjusted difference, -5.7%; 2-sided 95% CI, -11.3% to -0.1%; P = .32 for noninferiority). An adverse event of hemodynamic instability was recorded in 19 of 575 patients (3.3%) with remifentanil and 3 of 575 (0.5%) with neuromuscular blockers (adjusted difference, 2.8%; 95% CI, 1.2%-4.4%). Among adults at risk of aspiration during rapid sequence intubation in the operating room, remifentanil, compared with neuromuscular blockers, did not meet the criterion for noninferiority with regard to successful intubation on first attempt without major complications. Although remifentanil was statistically inferior to neuromuscular blockers, the wide confidence interval around the effect estimate remains compatible with noninferiority and limits conclusions about the clinical relevance of the difference. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03960801.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36594947
pii: 2800025
doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.23550
pmc: PMC9856823
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hypnotics and Sedatives 0
Neuromuscular Blocking Agents 0
Remifentanil P10582JYYK
Analgesics, Opioid 0

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03960801']

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

28-38

Investigateurs

Pascal Incagnoli (P)
Anne Li (A)
Xavier Pichon (X)
Amazigh Aguersif (A)
Vincent Minville (V)
Martin Dupuis (M)
Matthias Garot (M)
Florence Lallemant (F)
Christine Ducam (C)
Aurélien Rohn (A)
Alexis Duchalais (A)
Clément Starck (C)
Maxime Lecourtois Du Manoir (M)
Paul Rooze (P)
Amelie Trichot (A)
Romain Deransy (R)
Benoit Plaud (B)
Denis Frasca (D)
Laura Leo (L)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Références

JAMA. 2021 Dec 28;326(24):2488-2497
pubmed: 34879143
JAMA. 2021 Mar 23;325(12):1164-1172
pubmed: 33755076
Anaesthesia. 1999 Nov;54(11):1032-6
pubmed: 10540090
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018 Dec;37(6):639-651
pubmed: 29802903
Anesthesiology. 2006 Jan;104(1):158-69
pubmed: 16394702
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Apr;45(4):e21
pubmed: 21427295
Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Feb;29(1):40-47
pubmed: 27785883
Anesth Analg. 2001 Aug;93(2):494-513
pubmed: 11473886
J Clin Anesth. 2010 Sep;22(6):437-42
pubmed: 20868965
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Jan;20(1):37-43
pubmed: 12557834
Trials. 2021 Mar 30;22(1):237
pubmed: 33785069
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jun;120(6):1381-1393
pubmed: 29793603
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jan 1;154(1):9-17
pubmed: 30347104
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Apr 15;187(8):832-9
pubmed: 23348979
World J Surg. 2017 May;41(5):1184-1192
pubmed: 27646281
Anesthesiology. 2021 Aug 1;135(2):292-303
pubmed: 33848324
J Clin Anesth. 2006 Mar;18(2):102-7
pubmed: 16563326
JAMA. 2017 Feb 7;317(5):483-493
pubmed: 28118659
Allergy. 2018 Nov;73(11):2224-2233
pubmed: 29654608
Anaesthesia. 2022 Mar;77(3):326-338
pubmed: 34855986
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2009 Mar;28(3):206-10
pubmed: 19304443
Anesthesiology. 2022 Jan 1;136(1):31-81
pubmed: 34762729
Lancet. 2020 Dec 12;396(10266):1905-1913
pubmed: 33308472
JAMA. 2012 Dec 26;308(24):2594-604
pubmed: 23268518
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 28;380(9):811-821
pubmed: 30779528
Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Apr;60(4):258-63
pubmed: 27141109
Anaesthesist. 2020 Apr;69(4):262-269
pubmed: 32112114
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Oct;16(5):369-77
pubmed: 17913779
JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2179-2189
pubmed: 29800096
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020 Apr;39(2):215-220
pubmed: 31614244
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Sep;41(9):1538-48
pubmed: 25869405
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1357-1367
pubmed: 28976859
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Feb;7(2):129-140
pubmed: 30224322
Int J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 17;14(1):45
pubmed: 34404352
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Feb;36(2):248-55
pubmed: 19921148
JAMA. 2019 Dec 17;322(23):2303-2312
pubmed: 31846014
Anesthesiology. 1996 Apr;84(4):821-33
pubmed: 8638836
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020 Feb;39(1):125-142
pubmed: 31926308

Auteurs

Nicolas Grillot (N)

Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, INSERM CIC 0004 Immunologie et Infectiologie, Nantes, France.

Gilles Lebuffe (G)

Université Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 7354-GRITA Groupe de Recherche sur les Formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées, Pôle Anesthésie Réanimation, Lille, France.

Olivier Huet (O)

Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation et Médecine Péri-opératoire, CHRU Brest, Université de Bretagne occidentale, Brest, France.

Sigismond Lasocki (S)

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.

Xavier Pichon (X)

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Toulouse, University Toulouse III-Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France.

Mathieu Oudot (M)

Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier Departemental, La Roche sur Yon, France.

Nathalie Bruneau (N)

Université Lille, CHU Lille, Hopital Salengro, Pôle Anesthésie Réanimation, Lille, France.

Jean-Stéphane David (JS)

Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Groupe Hospitalier Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

Pierre Bouzat (P)

Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.

Alexandra Jobert (A)

Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, DRCI, Departement Promotion, Nantes, France.
Nantes Université, Univerisité Tours, CHU Nantes, CHU Tours, INSERM, Methods in Patient-Centered Outcomes and Health Research, SPHERE, Nantes, France.

Martine Tching-Sin (M)

Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de Pharmacie, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.

Fanny Feuillet (F)

Nantes Université, Univerisité Tours, CHU Nantes, CHU Tours, INSERM, Methods in Patient-Centered Outcomes and Health Research, SPHERE, Nantes, France.
Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de Pharmacie, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, DRI, Plateforme de Méthodologie et de Biostatistique, Nantes, France.

Raphael Cinotti (R)

Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, INSERM CIC 0004 Immunologie et Infectiologie, Nantes, France.

Karim Asehnoune (K)

Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, INSERM CIC 0004 Immunologie et Infectiologie, Nantes, France.

Antoine Roquilly (A)

Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, INSERM CIC 0004 Immunologie et Infectiologie, Nantes, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH